Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods

Geraldine McNeill, Paul Alfred Francois Fowler, Ronald John Maughan, B A MCGAW, M F FULLER, D GVOZDANOVIC, S GVOZDANOVIC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Body fat content of seven lean women (body mass index (BMI) 20.6 (SD 1.8) kg/m2) and seven overweight women (BMI 31.1 (SD 3.3) kg/m2) was estimated by six different methods: underwater weighing (UWW), body-water dilution (BWD), whole-body counting (K-40), skinfold thickness (SFT), bioelectrical impedance (BEI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using UWW as the reference method, the differences between percentage fat by each other method and the percentage fat by UWW were calculated for each subject. The mean difference was lowest for SFT and highest for BWD. MRI showed the lowest variability in individual results, and K-40 the highest. K-40 and BWD methods used in combination gave better agreement with UWW results than either K-40 or BWD methods alone. There was a weak negative correlation between the difference from the UWW results and percentage fat in the SFT measurements, but not in the BWD, K-40, BEI or MRI measurements, suggesting that for these methods the assumptions involved produced no greater inaccuracy in the overweight women than in the lean women. In all subjects the BEI offered little improvement over the traditional SFT measurements. The agreement between MRI and UWW estimates in both lean and overweight women suggests that MRI may be a satisfactory substitute for the more established methods of body fat estimation in adult women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-103
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume65
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1991

Keywords

  • body composition
  • methodology
  • obesity
  • skinfold thicknessNESS
  • labeled water
  • free mass
  • potassium
  • density
  • volume
  • nitrogen
  • adults
  • humans
  • males

Cite this

McNeill, G., Fowler, P. A. F., Maughan, R. J., MCGAW, B. A., FULLER, M. F., GVOZDANOVIC, D., & GVOZDANOVIC, S. (1991). Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods. British Journal of Nutrition, 65(2), 95-103.

Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods. / McNeill, Geraldine; Fowler, Paul Alfred Francois; Maughan, Ronald John; MCGAW, B A ; FULLER, M F ; GVOZDANOVIC, D ; GVOZDANOVIC, S .

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 65, No. 2, 03.1991, p. 95-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McNeill, G, Fowler, PAF, Maughan, RJ, MCGAW, BA, FULLER, MF, GVOZDANOVIC, D & GVOZDANOVIC, S 1991, 'Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods', British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 95-103.
McNeill G, Fowler PAF, Maughan RJ, MCGAW BA, FULLER MF, GVOZDANOVIC D et al. Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods. British Journal of Nutrition. 1991 Mar;65(2):95-103.
McNeill, Geraldine ; Fowler, Paul Alfred Francois ; Maughan, Ronald John ; MCGAW, B A ; FULLER, M F ; GVOZDANOVIC, D ; GVOZDANOVIC, S . / Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 1991 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 95-103.
@article{3efb34cc4d1f4364b3a83f49483854ff,
title = "Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods",
abstract = "Body fat content of seven lean women (body mass index (BMI) 20.6 (SD 1.8) kg/m2) and seven overweight women (BMI 31.1 (SD 3.3) kg/m2) was estimated by six different methods: underwater weighing (UWW), body-water dilution (BWD), whole-body counting (K-40), skinfold thickness (SFT), bioelectrical impedance (BEI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using UWW as the reference method, the differences between percentage fat by each other method and the percentage fat by UWW were calculated for each subject. The mean difference was lowest for SFT and highest for BWD. MRI showed the lowest variability in individual results, and K-40 the highest. K-40 and BWD methods used in combination gave better agreement with UWW results than either K-40 or BWD methods alone. There was a weak negative correlation between the difference from the UWW results and percentage fat in the SFT measurements, but not in the BWD, K-40, BEI or MRI measurements, suggesting that for these methods the assumptions involved produced no greater inaccuracy in the overweight women than in the lean women. In all subjects the BEI offered little improvement over the traditional SFT measurements. The agreement between MRI and UWW estimates in both lean and overweight women suggests that MRI may be a satisfactory substitute for the more established methods of body fat estimation in adult women.",
keywords = "body composition, methodology, obesity, skinfold thicknessNESS, labeled water, free mass, potassium, density, volume, nitrogen, adults, humans, males",
author = "Geraldine McNeill and Fowler, {Paul Alfred Francois} and Maughan, {Ronald John} and MCGAW, {B A} and FULLER, {M F} and D GVOZDANOVIC and S GVOZDANOVIC",
year = "1991",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "95--103",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge Univ. Press.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body fat in lean and overweight women estimated by six methods

AU - McNeill, Geraldine

AU - Fowler, Paul Alfred Francois

AU - Maughan, Ronald John

AU - MCGAW, B A

AU - FULLER, M F

AU - GVOZDANOVIC, D

AU - GVOZDANOVIC, S

PY - 1991/3

Y1 - 1991/3

N2 - Body fat content of seven lean women (body mass index (BMI) 20.6 (SD 1.8) kg/m2) and seven overweight women (BMI 31.1 (SD 3.3) kg/m2) was estimated by six different methods: underwater weighing (UWW), body-water dilution (BWD), whole-body counting (K-40), skinfold thickness (SFT), bioelectrical impedance (BEI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using UWW as the reference method, the differences between percentage fat by each other method and the percentage fat by UWW were calculated for each subject. The mean difference was lowest for SFT and highest for BWD. MRI showed the lowest variability in individual results, and K-40 the highest. K-40 and BWD methods used in combination gave better agreement with UWW results than either K-40 or BWD methods alone. There was a weak negative correlation between the difference from the UWW results and percentage fat in the SFT measurements, but not in the BWD, K-40, BEI or MRI measurements, suggesting that for these methods the assumptions involved produced no greater inaccuracy in the overweight women than in the lean women. In all subjects the BEI offered little improvement over the traditional SFT measurements. The agreement between MRI and UWW estimates in both lean and overweight women suggests that MRI may be a satisfactory substitute for the more established methods of body fat estimation in adult women.

AB - Body fat content of seven lean women (body mass index (BMI) 20.6 (SD 1.8) kg/m2) and seven overweight women (BMI 31.1 (SD 3.3) kg/m2) was estimated by six different methods: underwater weighing (UWW), body-water dilution (BWD), whole-body counting (K-40), skinfold thickness (SFT), bioelectrical impedance (BEI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using UWW as the reference method, the differences between percentage fat by each other method and the percentage fat by UWW were calculated for each subject. The mean difference was lowest for SFT and highest for BWD. MRI showed the lowest variability in individual results, and K-40 the highest. K-40 and BWD methods used in combination gave better agreement with UWW results than either K-40 or BWD methods alone. There was a weak negative correlation between the difference from the UWW results and percentage fat in the SFT measurements, but not in the BWD, K-40, BEI or MRI measurements, suggesting that for these methods the assumptions involved produced no greater inaccuracy in the overweight women than in the lean women. In all subjects the BEI offered little improvement over the traditional SFT measurements. The agreement between MRI and UWW estimates in both lean and overweight women suggests that MRI may be a satisfactory substitute for the more established methods of body fat estimation in adult women.

KW - body composition

KW - methodology

KW - obesity

KW - skinfold thicknessNESS

KW - labeled water

KW - free mass

KW - potassium

KW - density

KW - volume

KW - nitrogen

KW - adults

KW - humans

KW - males

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 95

EP - 103

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 2

ER -