Bone shape, structure and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture

Jennifer Susan Gregory, Alison Stewart, Peter Edward Undrill, David M Reid, Richard Malcolm Aspden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This article compares and combines methods for examining the external shape and the internal structure of the proximal femur with bone mineral density (BMD) to provide a classifier for hip fracture.

Materials and Methods: Fifty standard pelvic radiographs were available from age-matched fracture and control groups of postmenopausal women. Femoral shape was measured using an active shape model, the trabecular structure by means of a Fourier transform.

Results: Both the shape and various structure measures were independent of BMD (P = 0.16 and > 0.50, respectively). Calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)), each of shape (A(z) = 0.81), the best structure measure (A(z) = 0.79-0.93), and BMD (A(z) = 0.79), could partially classify the fracture and control groups. However, the combination achieved almost perfect separation (A(z) = 0.99).

Conclusions: This pilot study shows how bone shape and structure can complement BMD measurements for investigations of fracture risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-597
Number of pages6
JournalInvestigative Radiology
Volume40
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2005

Keywords

  • shape
  • density
  • structure
  • fracture
  • osteoporosis
  • finite-element-analysis
  • power-spectral-analysis
  • mineral density
  • trabecular bone
  • proximal femur
  • femoral-neck
  • mechanical-properties
  • distal radius
  • geometry
  • radiographs

Cite this

Bone shape, structure and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture. / Gregory, Jennifer Susan; Stewart, Alison; Undrill, Peter Edward; Reid, David M; Aspden, Richard Malcolm.

In: Investigative Radiology, Vol. 40, No. 9, 09.2005, p. 591-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gregory, Jennifer Susan ; Stewart, Alison ; Undrill, Peter Edward ; Reid, David M ; Aspden, Richard Malcolm. / Bone shape, structure and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture. In: Investigative Radiology. 2005 ; Vol. 40, No. 9. pp. 591-597.
@article{773f55cc8a2f41b4ab0bbcdc48aac5dc,
title = "Bone shape, structure and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture",
abstract = "Objectives: This article compares and combines methods for examining the external shape and the internal structure of the proximal femur with bone mineral density (BMD) to provide a classifier for hip fracture.Materials and Methods: Fifty standard pelvic radiographs were available from age-matched fracture and control groups of postmenopausal women. Femoral shape was measured using an active shape model, the trabecular structure by means of a Fourier transform.Results: Both the shape and various structure measures were independent of BMD (P = 0.16 and > 0.50, respectively). Calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)), each of shape (A(z) = 0.81), the best structure measure (A(z) = 0.79-0.93), and BMD (A(z) = 0.79), could partially classify the fracture and control groups. However, the combination achieved almost perfect separation (A(z) = 0.99).Conclusions: This pilot study shows how bone shape and structure can complement BMD measurements for investigations of fracture risk.",
keywords = "shape, density, structure, fracture, osteoporosis, finite-element-analysis, power-spectral-analysis, mineral density, trabecular bone, proximal femur, femoral-neck, mechanical-properties, distal radius, geometry, radiographs",
author = "Gregory, {Jennifer Susan} and Alison Stewart and Undrill, {Peter Edward} and Reid, {David M} and Aspden, {Richard Malcolm}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.rli.0000174475.41342.42",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "591--597",
journal = "Investigative Radiology",
issn = "0020-9996",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone shape, structure and density as determinants of osteoporotic hip fracture

AU - Gregory, Jennifer Susan

AU - Stewart, Alison

AU - Undrill, Peter Edward

AU - Reid, David M

AU - Aspden, Richard Malcolm

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Objectives: This article compares and combines methods for examining the external shape and the internal structure of the proximal femur with bone mineral density (BMD) to provide a classifier for hip fracture.Materials and Methods: Fifty standard pelvic radiographs were available from age-matched fracture and control groups of postmenopausal women. Femoral shape was measured using an active shape model, the trabecular structure by means of a Fourier transform.Results: Both the shape and various structure measures were independent of BMD (P = 0.16 and > 0.50, respectively). Calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)), each of shape (A(z) = 0.81), the best structure measure (A(z) = 0.79-0.93), and BMD (A(z) = 0.79), could partially classify the fracture and control groups. However, the combination achieved almost perfect separation (A(z) = 0.99).Conclusions: This pilot study shows how bone shape and structure can complement BMD measurements for investigations of fracture risk.

AB - Objectives: This article compares and combines methods for examining the external shape and the internal structure of the proximal femur with bone mineral density (BMD) to provide a classifier for hip fracture.Materials and Methods: Fifty standard pelvic radiographs were available from age-matched fracture and control groups of postmenopausal women. Femoral shape was measured using an active shape model, the trabecular structure by means of a Fourier transform.Results: Both the shape and various structure measures were independent of BMD (P = 0.16 and > 0.50, respectively). Calculating the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve (A(z)), each of shape (A(z) = 0.81), the best structure measure (A(z) = 0.79-0.93), and BMD (A(z) = 0.79), could partially classify the fracture and control groups. However, the combination achieved almost perfect separation (A(z) = 0.99).Conclusions: This pilot study shows how bone shape and structure can complement BMD measurements for investigations of fracture risk.

KW - shape

KW - density

KW - structure

KW - fracture

KW - osteoporosis

KW - finite-element-analysis

KW - power-spectral-analysis

KW - mineral density

KW - trabecular bone

KW - proximal femur

KW - femoral-neck

KW - mechanical-properties

KW - distal radius

KW - geometry

KW - radiographs

U2 - 10.1097/01.rli.0000174475.41342.42

DO - 10.1097/01.rli.0000174475.41342.42

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 591

EP - 597

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 9

ER -