Born in the USA: Exceptionalism in Maternity Care Organisation Among High-Income Countries

E. van Teijlingen, S. Wrede, C. Benoit, J. Sandall, R. DeVries

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In lay terms, childbirth is regarded as a purely biological event: what is more natural than birth and death? On the other hand, social scientists have long understood that 'natural' events are socially structured. In the case of birth, sociologists have examined the social and cultural shaping of its timing, outcome, and the organization of care throughout the perinatal period. Continuing in this tradition, we examine the peculiar social design of birth in the United States of America, contrasting this design with the ways birth is organised in Europe. We begin by showing how several key characteristics of the US health care system – including its inherent social inequality, its high level of medicalisation, and the substantial influence of private medical practice and insurance companies – influence the organization of maternity care there. We then explore how cultural characteristics of American society – its emphasis on individuality, the influence of moral conservatism in US politics, and the ease with which ordinary people take court action (the so-called 'litigation culture') – shape the delivery of care at birth. We conclude with a consideration of the implications of US maternity care exceptionalism for comparative sociological analysis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number5
    Number of pages11
    JournalSociological Research Online
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2009

    Fingerprint

    income
    organization
    medicalization
    insurance company
    event
    individuality
    conservatism
    medical practice
    social inequality
    social scientist
    sociologist
    health care
    death
    politics

    Keywords

    • pregnancy
    • comparative studies
    • exceptionalism
    • United States
    • midwifery
    • maternity care
    • birth

    Cite this

    Born in the USA : Exceptionalism in Maternity Care Organisation Among High-Income Countries. / van Teijlingen, E.; Wrede, S.; Benoit, C.; Sandall, J.; DeVries, R.

    In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 14, No. 1, 5, 31.01.2009.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    van Teijlingen, E. ; Wrede, S. ; Benoit, C. ; Sandall, J. ; DeVries, R. / Born in the USA : Exceptionalism in Maternity Care Organisation Among High-Income Countries. In: Sociological Research Online. 2009 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
    @article{627879d501fa4d7a8c1f59fc44b3c0f3,
    title = "Born in the USA: Exceptionalism in Maternity Care Organisation Among High-Income Countries",
    abstract = "In lay terms, childbirth is regarded as a purely biological event: what is more natural than birth and death? On the other hand, social scientists have long understood that 'natural' events are socially structured. In the case of birth, sociologists have examined the social and cultural shaping of its timing, outcome, and the organization of care throughout the perinatal period. Continuing in this tradition, we examine the peculiar social design of birth in the United States of America, contrasting this design with the ways birth is organised in Europe. We begin by showing how several key characteristics of the US health care system – including its inherent social inequality, its high level of medicalisation, and the substantial influence of private medical practice and insurance companies – influence the organization of maternity care there. We then explore how cultural characteristics of American society – its emphasis on individuality, the influence of moral conservatism in US politics, and the ease with which ordinary people take court action (the so-called 'litigation culture') – shape the delivery of care at birth. We conclude with a consideration of the implications of US maternity care exceptionalism for comparative sociological analysis.",
    keywords = "pregnancy, comparative studies, exceptionalism, United States, midwifery, maternity care, birth",
    author = "{van Teijlingen}, E. and S. Wrede and C. Benoit and J. Sandall and R. DeVries",
    year = "2009",
    month = "1",
    day = "31",
    doi = "10.5153/sro.1860",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    journal = "Sociological Research Online",
    issn = "1360-7804",
    publisher = "Sociological Research Online",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Born in the USA

    T2 - Exceptionalism in Maternity Care Organisation Among High-Income Countries

    AU - van Teijlingen, E.

    AU - Wrede, S.

    AU - Benoit, C.

    AU - Sandall, J.

    AU - DeVries, R.

    PY - 2009/1/31

    Y1 - 2009/1/31

    N2 - In lay terms, childbirth is regarded as a purely biological event: what is more natural than birth and death? On the other hand, social scientists have long understood that 'natural' events are socially structured. In the case of birth, sociologists have examined the social and cultural shaping of its timing, outcome, and the organization of care throughout the perinatal period. Continuing in this tradition, we examine the peculiar social design of birth in the United States of America, contrasting this design with the ways birth is organised in Europe. We begin by showing how several key characteristics of the US health care system – including its inherent social inequality, its high level of medicalisation, and the substantial influence of private medical practice and insurance companies – influence the organization of maternity care there. We then explore how cultural characteristics of American society – its emphasis on individuality, the influence of moral conservatism in US politics, and the ease with which ordinary people take court action (the so-called 'litigation culture') – shape the delivery of care at birth. We conclude with a consideration of the implications of US maternity care exceptionalism for comparative sociological analysis.

    AB - In lay terms, childbirth is regarded as a purely biological event: what is more natural than birth and death? On the other hand, social scientists have long understood that 'natural' events are socially structured. In the case of birth, sociologists have examined the social and cultural shaping of its timing, outcome, and the organization of care throughout the perinatal period. Continuing in this tradition, we examine the peculiar social design of birth in the United States of America, contrasting this design with the ways birth is organised in Europe. We begin by showing how several key characteristics of the US health care system – including its inherent social inequality, its high level of medicalisation, and the substantial influence of private medical practice and insurance companies – influence the organization of maternity care there. We then explore how cultural characteristics of American society – its emphasis on individuality, the influence of moral conservatism in US politics, and the ease with which ordinary people take court action (the so-called 'litigation culture') – shape the delivery of care at birth. We conclude with a consideration of the implications of US maternity care exceptionalism for comparative sociological analysis.

    KW - pregnancy

    KW - comparative studies

    KW - exceptionalism

    KW - United States

    KW - midwifery

    KW - maternity care

    KW - birth

    U2 - 10.5153/sro.1860

    DO - 10.5153/sro.1860

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    JO - Sociological Research Online

    JF - Sociological Research Online

    SN - 1360-7804

    IS - 1

    M1 - 5

    ER -