Brexit, the Revocation of Article 50, and the Path Not Taken: Wightman and Others for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Downloads (Pure)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-422
Number of pages6
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume22
Issue number3
Early online date14 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Cite this

@article{4650db7308644ceb860eba268a1df5a1,
title = "Brexit, the Revocation of Article 50, and the Path Not Taken: Wightman and Others for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union",
author = "Taylor, {Robert Brett} and Wilson, {Adelyn L. M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3366/elr.2018.0511",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "417--422",
journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",
issn = "1364-9809",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brexit, the Revocation of Article 50, and the Path Not Taken

T2 - Wightman and Others for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

AU - Taylor, Robert Brett

AU - Wilson, Adelyn L. M.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2018.0511

DO - 10.3366/elr.2018.0511

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 417

EP - 422

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

SN - 1364-9809

IS - 3

ER -