Bridging the Gap

IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although International Relations and Middle East Studies share an interest in several aspects of Middle East politics, interdisciplinary research remains surprisingly scarce. This article asks why, despite repeated calls since the inception of these fields, this interdisciplinary gap has never been bridged. It supplements conventional approaches which emphasize a simple intellectual history, with elements of a political economy of the organization and production of knowledge, arguing that while intellectual convergence may be a necessary condition for interdisciplinarity, only a shift in epistemic grounds within which fields understand their scholarship can bring this about, and that this in turn requires a shift in the way knowledge is organized and produced. First, the article provides a genealogy of calls for interdisciplinary scholarship. Second, it locates interdisciplinary relations in the universalist organization of knowledge within which they emerged and which still (re)produce inter- and intra-disciplinary divides today. Finally, it considers the potential for Constructivism to provide an interdisciplinary bridge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-145
Number of pages29
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Keywords

  • constructivism
  • disciplinary history
  • foucault
  • international relations
  • Middle East Studies
  • international-relations theory
  • future
  • sociology
  • American
  • power

Cite this

@article{cb246d2c379f4add8a569298f7cf2e7d,
title = "Bridging the Gap: IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy",
abstract = "Although International Relations and Middle East Studies share an interest in several aspects of Middle East politics, interdisciplinary research remains surprisingly scarce. This article asks why, despite repeated calls since the inception of these fields, this interdisciplinary gap has never been bridged. It supplements conventional approaches which emphasize a simple intellectual history, with elements of a political economy of the organization and production of knowledge, arguing that while intellectual convergence may be a necessary condition for interdisciplinarity, only a shift in epistemic grounds within which fields understand their scholarship can bring this about, and that this in turn requires a shift in the way knowledge is organized and produced. First, the article provides a genealogy of calls for interdisciplinary scholarship. Second, it locates interdisciplinary relations in the universalist organization of knowledge within which they emerged and which still (re)produce inter- and intra-disciplinary divides today. Finally, it considers the potential for Constructivism to provide an interdisciplinary bridge.",
keywords = "constructivism, disciplinary history, foucault, international relations, Middle East Studies, international-relations theory, future, sociology, American, power",
author = "Andrea Teti",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1354066107074291",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "117--145",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the Gap

T2 - IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy

AU - Teti, Andrea

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Although International Relations and Middle East Studies share an interest in several aspects of Middle East politics, interdisciplinary research remains surprisingly scarce. This article asks why, despite repeated calls since the inception of these fields, this interdisciplinary gap has never been bridged. It supplements conventional approaches which emphasize a simple intellectual history, with elements of a political economy of the organization and production of knowledge, arguing that while intellectual convergence may be a necessary condition for interdisciplinarity, only a shift in epistemic grounds within which fields understand their scholarship can bring this about, and that this in turn requires a shift in the way knowledge is organized and produced. First, the article provides a genealogy of calls for interdisciplinary scholarship. Second, it locates interdisciplinary relations in the universalist organization of knowledge within which they emerged and which still (re)produce inter- and intra-disciplinary divides today. Finally, it considers the potential for Constructivism to provide an interdisciplinary bridge.

AB - Although International Relations and Middle East Studies share an interest in several aspects of Middle East politics, interdisciplinary research remains surprisingly scarce. This article asks why, despite repeated calls since the inception of these fields, this interdisciplinary gap has never been bridged. It supplements conventional approaches which emphasize a simple intellectual history, with elements of a political economy of the organization and production of knowledge, arguing that while intellectual convergence may be a necessary condition for interdisciplinarity, only a shift in epistemic grounds within which fields understand their scholarship can bring this about, and that this in turn requires a shift in the way knowledge is organized and produced. First, the article provides a genealogy of calls for interdisciplinary scholarship. Second, it locates interdisciplinary relations in the universalist organization of knowledge within which they emerged and which still (re)produce inter- and intra-disciplinary divides today. Finally, it considers the potential for Constructivism to provide an interdisciplinary bridge.

KW - constructivism

KW - disciplinary history

KW - foucault

KW - international relations

KW - Middle East Studies

KW - international-relations theory

KW - future

KW - sociology

KW - American

KW - power

U2 - 10.1177/1354066107074291

DO - 10.1177/1354066107074291

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 117

EP - 145

JO - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

IS - 1

ER -