Business and International Environmental Agreements

Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies

Patrick Bernhagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes the political influence of business in the context of international environmental cooperation. Locating the sources of business power in three distinct factors-organizational strength, structural privilege, and informational advantage-the article evaluates the contributions of these factors to explanations of states' ratification of, and compliance with, international environmental agreements. Using data on 35 advanced industrialized democracies, the results suggest that business influence can be best explained by reference to informational asymmetries. While countries whose economies are exposed to international trade tend to participate less in international regimes, strong domestic environmental movements can counteract incentives for non-participation by providing political decision-makers with alternative information about the costs and benefits of participation. Regime compliance also increases with the availability of independent information through environmental groups, as well as with the degree of politico-economic integration found in neocorporatist systems of interest intermediation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-110
Number of pages32
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Keywords

  • OECD-countries
  • Western democracies
  • signaling model
  • institutions
  • policy
  • information
  • interests
  • performance
  • corporatism
  • commitment

Cite this

Business and International Environmental Agreements : Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies. / Bernhagen, Patrick.

In: Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 02.2008, p. 78-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcf73b3a23684724b54d1cbf4fe9b42b,
title = "Business and International Environmental Agreements: Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies",
abstract = "This article analyzes the political influence of business in the context of international environmental cooperation. Locating the sources of business power in three distinct factors-organizational strength, structural privilege, and informational advantage-the article evaluates the contributions of these factors to explanations of states' ratification of, and compliance with, international environmental agreements. Using data on 35 advanced industrialized democracies, the results suggest that business influence can be best explained by reference to informational asymmetries. While countries whose economies are exposed to international trade tend to participate less in international regimes, strong domestic environmental movements can counteract incentives for non-participation by providing political decision-makers with alternative information about the costs and benefits of participation. Regime compliance also increases with the availability of independent information through environmental groups, as well as with the degree of politico-economic integration found in neocorporatist systems of interest intermediation.",
keywords = "OECD-countries, Western democracies, signaling model, institutions, policy, information, interests, performance, corporatism, commitment",
author = "Patrick Bernhagen",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1162/GLEP.2008.8.1.78",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "78--110",
journal = "Global Environmental Politics",
issn = "1526-3800",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Business and International Environmental Agreements

T2 - Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies

AU - Bernhagen, Patrick

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - This article analyzes the political influence of business in the context of international environmental cooperation. Locating the sources of business power in three distinct factors-organizational strength, structural privilege, and informational advantage-the article evaluates the contributions of these factors to explanations of states' ratification of, and compliance with, international environmental agreements. Using data on 35 advanced industrialized democracies, the results suggest that business influence can be best explained by reference to informational asymmetries. While countries whose economies are exposed to international trade tend to participate less in international regimes, strong domestic environmental movements can counteract incentives for non-participation by providing political decision-makers with alternative information about the costs and benefits of participation. Regime compliance also increases with the availability of independent information through environmental groups, as well as with the degree of politico-economic integration found in neocorporatist systems of interest intermediation.

AB - This article analyzes the political influence of business in the context of international environmental cooperation. Locating the sources of business power in three distinct factors-organizational strength, structural privilege, and informational advantage-the article evaluates the contributions of these factors to explanations of states' ratification of, and compliance with, international environmental agreements. Using data on 35 advanced industrialized democracies, the results suggest that business influence can be best explained by reference to informational asymmetries. While countries whose economies are exposed to international trade tend to participate less in international regimes, strong domestic environmental movements can counteract incentives for non-participation by providing political decision-makers with alternative information about the costs and benefits of participation. Regime compliance also increases with the availability of independent information through environmental groups, as well as with the degree of politico-economic integration found in neocorporatist systems of interest intermediation.

KW - OECD-countries

KW - Western democracies

KW - signaling model

KW - institutions

KW - policy

KW - information

KW - interests

KW - performance

KW - corporatism

KW - commitment

U2 - 10.1162/GLEP.2008.8.1.78

DO - 10.1162/GLEP.2008.8.1.78

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 78

EP - 110

JO - Global Environmental Politics

JF - Global Environmental Politics

SN - 1526-3800

IS - 1

ER -