But to do right …

Why the language of ‘rights’ does not do justice to justice

Bernd Wannenwetsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The essay critically engages Woltertorff’s account of justice by challenging the political status of its archaeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of ‘primary’ and therefore ‘procedural’ justice, its suggestion to think of rights as ‘social bonds’ and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of ‘worth’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-146
Number of pages9
JournalStudies in Christian Ethics
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Social Bonds
Procedural Justice
Language Rights
Language
Deity
Archaeology
Justice

Cite this

But to do right … : Why the language of ‘rights’ does not do justice to justice. / Wannenwetsch, Bernd.

In: Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 138-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1be3ab145fa431cb8c87899c3cce101,
title = "But to do right …: Why the language of ‘rights’ does not do justice to justice",
abstract = "The essay critically engages Woltertorff’s account of justice by challenging the political status of its archaeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of ‘primary’ and therefore ‘procedural’ justice, its suggestion to think of rights as ‘social bonds’ and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of ‘worth’.",
author = "Bernd Wannenwetsch",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0953946809359464",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "138--146",
journal = "Studies in Christian Ethics",
issn = "0953-9468",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - But to do right …

T2 - Why the language of ‘rights’ does not do justice to justice

AU - Wannenwetsch, Bernd

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - The essay critically engages Woltertorff’s account of justice by challenging the political status of its archaeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of ‘primary’ and therefore ‘procedural’ justice, its suggestion to think of rights as ‘social bonds’ and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of ‘worth’.

AB - The essay critically engages Woltertorff’s account of justice by challenging the political status of its archaeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of ‘primary’ and therefore ‘procedural’ justice, its suggestion to think of rights as ‘social bonds’ and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of ‘worth’.

U2 - 10.1177/0953946809359464

DO - 10.1177/0953946809359464

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 138

EP - 146

JO - Studies in Christian Ethics

JF - Studies in Christian Ethics

SN - 0953-9468

IS - 2

ER -