Calibrating reach distance to visual targets

Mark Arwyn Mon-Williams, Geoffrey P. Bingham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The authors investigated the calibration of reach distance by gradually distorting the haptic feedback obtained when participants grasped visible target objects. The authors found that the modified relationship between visually specified distance and reach distance could be captured by a straight-line mapping function. Thus, the relation could be described using 2 parameters: bias and slope. The authors investigated whether calibration generalized across reach space with respect to changes in bias and slope. In Experiment 1, the authors showed that both bias and slope recalibrate. In Experiment 2, they tested the symmetries of reach space with respect to changes in bias. They discovered that reach space is asymmetric, with the bias shifting inward more readily than outward. The authors measured how rapidly the system calibrated and the stability of calibration once feedback was removed. In Experiment 3, they showed that bias and slope can be calibrated independently of one another. In Experiment 4, the authors showed that these calibration effects are not cognitively penetrable.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)645-656
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

    Keywords

    • calibration
    • prehension
    • vision
    • haptic
    • distance perception
    • haptic feedback
    • definite distance
    • perception
    • adaptation
    • displacement
    • precision

    Cite this

    Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. / Mon-Williams, Mark Arwyn; Bingham, Geoffrey P.

    In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 645-656.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mon-Williams, Mark Arwyn ; Bingham, Geoffrey P. / Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2007 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 645-656.
    @article{be57f1ed00244e21910bc1ff1a7a5c43,
    title = "Calibrating reach distance to visual targets",
    abstract = "The authors investigated the calibration of reach distance by gradually distorting the haptic feedback obtained when participants grasped visible target objects. The authors found that the modified relationship between visually specified distance and reach distance could be captured by a straight-line mapping function. Thus, the relation could be described using 2 parameters: bias and slope. The authors investigated whether calibration generalized across reach space with respect to changes in bias and slope. In Experiment 1, the authors showed that both bias and slope recalibrate. In Experiment 2, they tested the symmetries of reach space with respect to changes in bias. They discovered that reach space is asymmetric, with the bias shifting inward more readily than outward. The authors measured how rapidly the system calibrated and the stability of calibration once feedback was removed. In Experiment 3, they showed that bias and slope can be calibrated independently of one another. In Experiment 4, the authors showed that these calibration effects are not cognitively penetrable.",
    keywords = "calibration, prehension, vision, haptic, distance perception, haptic feedback, definite distance, perception, adaptation, displacement, precision",
    author = "Mon-Williams, {Mark Arwyn} and Bingham, {Geoffrey P.}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.645",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "645--656",
    journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
    issn = "0096-1523",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Calibrating reach distance to visual targets

    AU - Mon-Williams, Mark Arwyn

    AU - Bingham, Geoffrey P.

    PY - 2007/6

    Y1 - 2007/6

    N2 - The authors investigated the calibration of reach distance by gradually distorting the haptic feedback obtained when participants grasped visible target objects. The authors found that the modified relationship between visually specified distance and reach distance could be captured by a straight-line mapping function. Thus, the relation could be described using 2 parameters: bias and slope. The authors investigated whether calibration generalized across reach space with respect to changes in bias and slope. In Experiment 1, the authors showed that both bias and slope recalibrate. In Experiment 2, they tested the symmetries of reach space with respect to changes in bias. They discovered that reach space is asymmetric, with the bias shifting inward more readily than outward. The authors measured how rapidly the system calibrated and the stability of calibration once feedback was removed. In Experiment 3, they showed that bias and slope can be calibrated independently of one another. In Experiment 4, the authors showed that these calibration effects are not cognitively penetrable.

    AB - The authors investigated the calibration of reach distance by gradually distorting the haptic feedback obtained when participants grasped visible target objects. The authors found that the modified relationship between visually specified distance and reach distance could be captured by a straight-line mapping function. Thus, the relation could be described using 2 parameters: bias and slope. The authors investigated whether calibration generalized across reach space with respect to changes in bias and slope. In Experiment 1, the authors showed that both bias and slope recalibrate. In Experiment 2, they tested the symmetries of reach space with respect to changes in bias. They discovered that reach space is asymmetric, with the bias shifting inward more readily than outward. The authors measured how rapidly the system calibrated and the stability of calibration once feedback was removed. In Experiment 3, they showed that bias and slope can be calibrated independently of one another. In Experiment 4, the authors showed that these calibration effects are not cognitively penetrable.

    KW - calibration

    KW - prehension

    KW - vision

    KW - haptic

    KW - distance perception

    KW - haptic feedback

    KW - definite distance

    KW - perception

    KW - adaptation

    KW - displacement

    KW - precision

    U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.645

    DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.645

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 645

    EP - 656

    JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    SN - 0096-1523

    IS - 3

    ER -