Calming the Waters in the West African Region

The Case of Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

On 23 September 2017, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) unanimously fixed the course of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire and, thus, ended a longstanding dispute between the two West African neighbours. In addition to maritime delimitation, the legal reasoning and conclusions drawn in the judgment – especially in view of the Special Chamber’s Provisional Measures Order of 25 April 2017 – are significant, in that they shed light on States’ rights and obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in respect of undelimited maritime areas, and also on the potential to respond meaningfully to unilateral resource-related activities in disputed waters through recourse to provisional measures of protection. The present paper examines the key aspects of the Special Chamber’s ruling and highlights some issues of practical significance for the future conduct of unilateral petroleum activities in disputed maritime areas.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages29
JournalAfrican Journal of International and Comparative Law
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

chamber
Ghana
water
delimitation
Law
recourse
obligation
UNO
resources

Keywords

  • maritime delimitation
  • Ghana/Cote d'Ivorie
  • unilateral activities
  • oil and gas
  • international tribunal for the law of the sea

Cite this

@article{ae15e6ea17604e44a4b6b880d8562228,
title = "Calming the Waters in the West African Region: The Case of Ghana and C{\^o}te d'Ivoire",
abstract = "On 23 September 2017, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) unanimously fixed the course of the maritime boundary between Ghana and C{\^o}te d'Ivoire and, thus, ended a longstanding dispute between the two West African neighbours. In addition to maritime delimitation, the legal reasoning and conclusions drawn in the judgment – especially in view of the Special Chamber’s Provisional Measures Order of 25 April 2017 – are significant, in that they shed light on States’ rights and obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in respect of undelimited maritime areas, and also on the potential to respond meaningfully to unilateral resource-related activities in disputed waters through recourse to provisional measures of protection. The present paper examines the key aspects of the Special Chamber’s ruling and highlights some issues of practical significance for the future conduct of unilateral petroleum activities in disputed maritime areas.",
keywords = "maritime delimitation, Ghana/Cote d'Ivorie, unilateral activities, oil and gas, international tribunal for the law of the sea",
author = "Constantinos Yiallourides",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3052171",
language = "English",
journal = "African Journal of International and Comparative Law",
issn = "0954-8890",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calming the Waters in the West African Region

T2 - The Case of Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire

AU - Yiallourides, Constantinos

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - On 23 September 2017, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) unanimously fixed the course of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire and, thus, ended a longstanding dispute between the two West African neighbours. In addition to maritime delimitation, the legal reasoning and conclusions drawn in the judgment – especially in view of the Special Chamber’s Provisional Measures Order of 25 April 2017 – are significant, in that they shed light on States’ rights and obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in respect of undelimited maritime areas, and also on the potential to respond meaningfully to unilateral resource-related activities in disputed waters through recourse to provisional measures of protection. The present paper examines the key aspects of the Special Chamber’s ruling and highlights some issues of practical significance for the future conduct of unilateral petroleum activities in disputed maritime areas.

AB - On 23 September 2017, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) unanimously fixed the course of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire and, thus, ended a longstanding dispute between the two West African neighbours. In addition to maritime delimitation, the legal reasoning and conclusions drawn in the judgment – especially in view of the Special Chamber’s Provisional Measures Order of 25 April 2017 – are significant, in that they shed light on States’ rights and obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in respect of undelimited maritime areas, and also on the potential to respond meaningfully to unilateral resource-related activities in disputed waters through recourse to provisional measures of protection. The present paper examines the key aspects of the Special Chamber’s ruling and highlights some issues of practical significance for the future conduct of unilateral petroleum activities in disputed maritime areas.

KW - maritime delimitation

KW - Ghana/Cote d'Ivorie

KW - unilateral activities

KW - oil and gas

KW - international tribunal for the law of the sea

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3052171

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3052171

M3 - Article

JO - African Journal of International and Comparative Law

JF - African Journal of International and Comparative Law

SN - 0954-8890

ER -