Can blindsight be superior to 'sighted-sight'?

Ceri T Trevethan, Arash Sahraie, Larry Weiskrantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DB, the first blindsight case to be tested extensively (Weiskrantz, 1986) has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field defect. In a temporal two alternative forced choice (2AFC) detection experiment we have investigated the limits of DB's detection ability within his field defect. Blind field performance was compared to his sighted field performance and to an age-matched control group (n = 6). DB reliably detected the presence of a small (2 degrees), low contrast (7%), 4.6c/degrees Gabor patch with the same space-averaged luminance as the background presented within his blind field but performed at chance levels at the same eccentricity (11.3 degrees) within his sighted field. Investigation of detection as a function of stimulus contrast revealed DB's ability to detect the presence of an 8% contrast stimulus within his blind field, compared to 12% in his sighted field. No significant difference in detection performance between DB's sighted field and the performance of six age-matched control participants suggests poor sighted field performance does not account for the results. Monocular testing also rules out differences between the eyes as an explanation, suggesting that DB demonstrates superior detection for certain stimuli within his visual field defect compared to normal vision. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-501
Number of pages11
JournalCognition
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Keywords

  • blindsight
  • contrast sensitivity
  • two alternative forced choice detection
  • near-threshold vision
  • cortical blindness
  • spatial channels
  • sensitivity
  • hemianopia
  • subject
  • cortex

Cite this

Can blindsight be superior to 'sighted-sight'? / Trevethan, Ceri T; Sahraie, Arash; Weiskrantz, Larry.

In: Cognition, Vol. 103, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 491-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trevethan, Ceri T ; Sahraie, Arash ; Weiskrantz, Larry. / Can blindsight be superior to 'sighted-sight'?. In: Cognition. 2007 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 491-501.
@article{c186de513e5645e397fa1f40ef338ce6,
title = "Can blindsight be superior to 'sighted-sight'?",
abstract = "DB, the first blindsight case to be tested extensively (Weiskrantz, 1986) has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field defect. In a temporal two alternative forced choice (2AFC) detection experiment we have investigated the limits of DB's detection ability within his field defect. Blind field performance was compared to his sighted field performance and to an age-matched control group (n = 6). DB reliably detected the presence of a small (2 degrees), low contrast (7{\%}), 4.6c/degrees Gabor patch with the same space-averaged luminance as the background presented within his blind field but performed at chance levels at the same eccentricity (11.3 degrees) within his sighted field. Investigation of detection as a function of stimulus contrast revealed DB's ability to detect the presence of an 8{\%} contrast stimulus within his blind field, compared to 12{\%} in his sighted field. No significant difference in detection performance between DB's sighted field and the performance of six age-matched control participants suggests poor sighted field performance does not account for the results. Monocular testing also rules out differences between the eyes as an explanation, suggesting that DB demonstrates superior detection for certain stimuli within his visual field defect compared to normal vision. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "blindsight, contrast sensitivity, two alternative forced choice detection, near-threshold vision, cortical blindness, spatial channels, sensitivity, hemianopia, subject, cortex",
author = "Trevethan, {Ceri T} and Arash Sahraie and Larry Weiskrantz",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.011",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "491--501",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can blindsight be superior to 'sighted-sight'?

AU - Trevethan, Ceri T

AU - Sahraie, Arash

AU - Weiskrantz, Larry

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - DB, the first blindsight case to be tested extensively (Weiskrantz, 1986) has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field defect. In a temporal two alternative forced choice (2AFC) detection experiment we have investigated the limits of DB's detection ability within his field defect. Blind field performance was compared to his sighted field performance and to an age-matched control group (n = 6). DB reliably detected the presence of a small (2 degrees), low contrast (7%), 4.6c/degrees Gabor patch with the same space-averaged luminance as the background presented within his blind field but performed at chance levels at the same eccentricity (11.3 degrees) within his sighted field. Investigation of detection as a function of stimulus contrast revealed DB's ability to detect the presence of an 8% contrast stimulus within his blind field, compared to 12% in his sighted field. No significant difference in detection performance between DB's sighted field and the performance of six age-matched control participants suggests poor sighted field performance does not account for the results. Monocular testing also rules out differences between the eyes as an explanation, suggesting that DB demonstrates superior detection for certain stimuli within his visual field defect compared to normal vision. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - DB, the first blindsight case to be tested extensively (Weiskrantz, 1986) has demonstrated the ability to detect and discriminate a range of visual stimuli presented within his perimetrically blind visual field defect. In a temporal two alternative forced choice (2AFC) detection experiment we have investigated the limits of DB's detection ability within his field defect. Blind field performance was compared to his sighted field performance and to an age-matched control group (n = 6). DB reliably detected the presence of a small (2 degrees), low contrast (7%), 4.6c/degrees Gabor patch with the same space-averaged luminance as the background presented within his blind field but performed at chance levels at the same eccentricity (11.3 degrees) within his sighted field. Investigation of detection as a function of stimulus contrast revealed DB's ability to detect the presence of an 8% contrast stimulus within his blind field, compared to 12% in his sighted field. No significant difference in detection performance between DB's sighted field and the performance of six age-matched control participants suggests poor sighted field performance does not account for the results. Monocular testing also rules out differences between the eyes as an explanation, suggesting that DB demonstrates superior detection for certain stimuli within his visual field defect compared to normal vision. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - blindsight

KW - contrast sensitivity

KW - two alternative forced choice detection

KW - near-threshold vision

KW - cortical blindness

KW - spatial channels

KW - sensitivity

KW - hemianopia

KW - subject

KW - cortex

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.011

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 491

EP - 501

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 3

ER -