Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration?

Fred Worrall, Martin G. Evans, Aletta Bonn, Mark Reed, D Chapman, James Holden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Upland peat soils represent a large terrestrial carbon store and as such have the potential to be either an ongoing net sink of carbon or a significant net source of carbon. In the UK many upland peats are managed for a range of purposes but these purposes have rarely included carbon stewardship. However, there is now an opportunity to consider whether management practices could be altered to enhance storage of carbon in upland peats. Further. there are now voluntary and regulated carbon trading schemes operational throughout Europe that mean stored carbon, if verified, could have an economic and tradeable value. This means that new income streams could become available for upland management. The 'Sustainable Uplands' RELU project has developed a model for calculating carbon fluxes from peat soils that covers all carbon uptake and release pathways (e.g. fluvial and gaseous pathways). The model has been developed so that the impact of common management options within UK upland peats can be considered. The model was run for a decade from 1997-2006 and applied to an area of 550 km(2) of upland peat soils in the Peak District. The study estimates that the region is presently a net sink of - 62 ktonnes CO2 equivalent at an average export of - 136 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. If management interventions were targeted across the area the total sink could increase to - 160 ktonnes CO2/yr at an average export of - 219 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. However, not all interventions resulted in a benefit; some resulted in increased losses Of CO2 equivalents. Given present costs of peatland restoration and value of carbon offsets, the study suggests that 51% of those areas, where a carbon benefit was estimated by modelling for targeted action of management interventions, would show a profit from carbon offsetting within 30 years. However, this percentage is very dependent upon the price of carbon used. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-36
Number of pages11
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume408
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2009

Keywords

  • carbon
  • peat
  • offsetting
  • restoration
  • Pennine blanket bog
  • water-table
  • peat catchment
  • soil respiration
  • landscape scale
  • methane emissions
  • CO2 exchange
  • doc flux
  • temperature
  • vegetation

Cite this

Worrall, F., Evans, M. G., Bonn, A., Reed, M., Chapman, D., & Holden, J. (2009). Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration? Science of the Total Environment, 408(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022

Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration? / Worrall, Fred; Evans, Martin G. ; Bonn, Aletta; Reed, Mark; Chapman, D; Holden, James.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 408, No. 1, 15.12.2009, p. 26-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Worrall, F, Evans, MG, Bonn, A, Reed, M, Chapman, D & Holden, J 2009, 'Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration?', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 408, no. 1, pp. 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022
Worrall, Fred ; Evans, Martin G. ; Bonn, Aletta ; Reed, Mark ; Chapman, D ; Holden, James. / Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration?. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2009 ; Vol. 408, No. 1. pp. 26-36.
@article{e08bf221f2bb481693c4687d2a59f0d0,
title = "Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration?",
abstract = "Upland peat soils represent a large terrestrial carbon store and as such have the potential to be either an ongoing net sink of carbon or a significant net source of carbon. In the UK many upland peats are managed for a range of purposes but these purposes have rarely included carbon stewardship. However, there is now an opportunity to consider whether management practices could be altered to enhance storage of carbon in upland peats. Further. there are now voluntary and regulated carbon trading schemes operational throughout Europe that mean stored carbon, if verified, could have an economic and tradeable value. This means that new income streams could become available for upland management. The 'Sustainable Uplands' RELU project has developed a model for calculating carbon fluxes from peat soils that covers all carbon uptake and release pathways (e.g. fluvial and gaseous pathways). The model has been developed so that the impact of common management options within UK upland peats can be considered. The model was run for a decade from 1997-2006 and applied to an area of 550 km(2) of upland peat soils in the Peak District. The study estimates that the region is presently a net sink of - 62 ktonnes CO2 equivalent at an average export of - 136 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. If management interventions were targeted across the area the total sink could increase to - 160 ktonnes CO2/yr at an average export of - 219 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. However, not all interventions resulted in a benefit; some resulted in increased losses Of CO2 equivalents. Given present costs of peatland restoration and value of carbon offsets, the study suggests that 51{\%} of those areas, where a carbon benefit was estimated by modelling for targeted action of management interventions, would show a profit from carbon offsetting within 30 years. However, this percentage is very dependent upon the price of carbon used. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "carbon, peat, offsetting, restoration, Pennine blanket bog, water-table, peat catchment, soil respiration, landscape scale, methane emissions, CO2 exchange, doc flux, temperature, vegetation",
author = "Fred Worrall and Evans, {Martin G.} and Aletta Bonn and Mark Reed and D Chapman and James Holden",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022",
language = "English",
volume = "408",
pages = "26--36",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration?

AU - Worrall, Fred

AU - Evans, Martin G.

AU - Bonn, Aletta

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Chapman, D

AU - Holden, James

PY - 2009/12/15

Y1 - 2009/12/15

N2 - Upland peat soils represent a large terrestrial carbon store and as such have the potential to be either an ongoing net sink of carbon or a significant net source of carbon. In the UK many upland peats are managed for a range of purposes but these purposes have rarely included carbon stewardship. However, there is now an opportunity to consider whether management practices could be altered to enhance storage of carbon in upland peats. Further. there are now voluntary and regulated carbon trading schemes operational throughout Europe that mean stored carbon, if verified, could have an economic and tradeable value. This means that new income streams could become available for upland management. The 'Sustainable Uplands' RELU project has developed a model for calculating carbon fluxes from peat soils that covers all carbon uptake and release pathways (e.g. fluvial and gaseous pathways). The model has been developed so that the impact of common management options within UK upland peats can be considered. The model was run for a decade from 1997-2006 and applied to an area of 550 km(2) of upland peat soils in the Peak District. The study estimates that the region is presently a net sink of - 62 ktonnes CO2 equivalent at an average export of - 136 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. If management interventions were targeted across the area the total sink could increase to - 160 ktonnes CO2/yr at an average export of - 219 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. However, not all interventions resulted in a benefit; some resulted in increased losses Of CO2 equivalents. Given present costs of peatland restoration and value of carbon offsets, the study suggests that 51% of those areas, where a carbon benefit was estimated by modelling for targeted action of management interventions, would show a profit from carbon offsetting within 30 years. However, this percentage is very dependent upon the price of carbon used. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Upland peat soils represent a large terrestrial carbon store and as such have the potential to be either an ongoing net sink of carbon or a significant net source of carbon. In the UK many upland peats are managed for a range of purposes but these purposes have rarely included carbon stewardship. However, there is now an opportunity to consider whether management practices could be altered to enhance storage of carbon in upland peats. Further. there are now voluntary and regulated carbon trading schemes operational throughout Europe that mean stored carbon, if verified, could have an economic and tradeable value. This means that new income streams could become available for upland management. The 'Sustainable Uplands' RELU project has developed a model for calculating carbon fluxes from peat soils that covers all carbon uptake and release pathways (e.g. fluvial and gaseous pathways). The model has been developed so that the impact of common management options within UK upland peats can be considered. The model was run for a decade from 1997-2006 and applied to an area of 550 km(2) of upland peat soils in the Peak District. The study estimates that the region is presently a net sink of - 62 ktonnes CO2 equivalent at an average export of - 136 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. If management interventions were targeted across the area the total sink could increase to - 160 ktonnes CO2/yr at an average export of - 219 tonnes CO2 equivalent/km(2)/yr. However, not all interventions resulted in a benefit; some resulted in increased losses Of CO2 equivalents. Given present costs of peatland restoration and value of carbon offsets, the study suggests that 51% of those areas, where a carbon benefit was estimated by modelling for targeted action of management interventions, would show a profit from carbon offsetting within 30 years. However, this percentage is very dependent upon the price of carbon used. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - carbon

KW - peat

KW - offsetting

KW - restoration

KW - Pennine blanket bog

KW - water-table

KW - peat catchment

KW - soil respiration

KW - landscape scale

KW - methane emissions

KW - CO2 exchange

KW - doc flux

KW - temperature

KW - vegetation

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022

M3 - Article

VL - 408

SP - 26

EP - 36

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

IS - 1

ER -