Can Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography Replace Hysterosalpingography as First-Choice Tubal Patency Test? A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial

Nienke Van Welie, Joukje Van Rijswijk, Kim Dreyer, Machiel H.A. Van Hooff, Jan Peter De Bruin, Harold R. Verhoeve, Femke Mol, Wilhelmina M. Van Baal, Maaike A.F. Traas, Arno M. Van Peperstraten, Arentje P. Manger, Judith Gianotten, Cornelia H. De Koning, Aafke M.H. Koning, Neriman Bayram, David P. Van Der Ham, Francisca P.J.M. Vrouenraets, Michaela Kalafusova, Bob I.G. Van De Laar, Jeroen KaijserArjon F. Lambeek, Wouter J. Meijer, Frank J.M. Broekmans, Olivier Valkenburg, Lucy F. Van Der Voet, Jeroen Van Disseldorp, Marieke J. Lambers, Rachel Tros, Cornelis B. Lambalk, Jaap Stoker, Madelon Van Wely, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Ben Willem J. Mol, Velja Mijatovic

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A main cause of female infertility is tubal pathology, with 11% to 30% of cases resulting from previous surgery, infections (such as sexually transmitted diseases), or endometriosis. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is considered as the first choice for a tubal patency test during fertility workup, but the more patient-friendly hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography option has also been introduced.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-483
Number of pages3
JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume77
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography Replace Hysterosalpingography as First-Choice Tubal Patency Test? A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this