Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients?

K. Cocks* (Corresponding Author), G. Velikova, M. T. King, P. M. Fayers, J. M. Brown

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This qualitative study piloted a method for eliciting patient opinion on the size of group differences in quality of life (QOL) scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Using scenarios from published studies, patients were asked the differences in QOL they would expect between two groups of patients or a group of patients over time. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis used. Eleven breast cancer patients were interviewed. The final thematic framework consisted of three major themes: (1) their ability to use published data to judge the size of differences in QOL scores, (2) their ability to gain familiarity and understanding of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire in an interview situation and (3) their ability to understand and assess differences from a group of patients rather than on an individual basis. Patients felt able to understand the questionnaire and scoring. They provided an opinion on whether differences in QOL scores were trivial, small, medium or large. Patient perspectives were often based on their own experience of the disease and treatments and their opinions were varied. In order to estimate clinically meaningful differences from published literature, a larger number of patients with varied experiences would be required and a consensus process used to align opinions where possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-238
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date27 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Aptitude
Interviews
Consensus
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Consensus
  • Meaningful difference
  • Patient opinion
  • Qualitative interviews
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients? / Cocks, K. (Corresponding Author); Velikova, G.; King, M. T.; Fayers, P. M.; Brown, J. M.

In: European Journal of Cancer Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 228-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cocks, K. ; Velikova, G. ; King, M. T. ; Fayers, P. M. ; Brown, J. M. / Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients?. In: European Journal of Cancer Care. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 228-238.
@article{6430a90d9efb426990997f77d68a9797,
title = "Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients?",
abstract = "This qualitative study piloted a method for eliciting patient opinion on the size of group differences in quality of life (QOL) scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Using scenarios from published studies, patients were asked the differences in QOL they would expect between two groups of patients or a group of patients over time. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis used. Eleven breast cancer patients were interviewed. The final thematic framework consisted of three major themes: (1) their ability to use published data to judge the size of differences in QOL scores, (2) their ability to gain familiarity and understanding of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire in an interview situation and (3) their ability to understand and assess differences from a group of patients rather than on an individual basis. Patients felt able to understand the questionnaire and scoring. They provided an opinion on whether differences in QOL scores were trivial, small, medium or large. Patient perspectives were often based on their own experience of the disease and treatments and their opinions were varied. In order to estimate clinically meaningful differences from published literature, a larger number of patients with varied experiences would be required and a consensus process used to align opinions where possible.",
keywords = "Cancer, Consensus, Meaningful difference, Patient opinion, Qualitative interviews, Quality of life",
author = "K. Cocks and G. Velikova and King, {M. T.} and Fayers, {P. M.} and Brown, {J. M.}",
note = "ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The EBIG study was funded by Cancer Research UK (grant number C7852/A5653). The authors wish to thank the patients who participated in these interviews and the Cancer Research UK Psychosocial Oncology Group at St James Hospital in Leeds who helped with interviewer training and identified patients for participation in the study.",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/ecc.12113",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "228--238",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer Care",
issn = "0961-5423",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can individual patients assess differences in quality of life between groups of patients?

AU - Cocks, K.

AU - Velikova, G.

AU - King, M. T.

AU - Fayers, P. M.

AU - Brown, J. M.

N1 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The EBIG study was funded by Cancer Research UK (grant number C7852/A5653). The authors wish to thank the patients who participated in these interviews and the Cancer Research UK Psychosocial Oncology Group at St James Hospital in Leeds who helped with interviewer training and identified patients for participation in the study.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This qualitative study piloted a method for eliciting patient opinion on the size of group differences in quality of life (QOL) scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Using scenarios from published studies, patients were asked the differences in QOL they would expect between two groups of patients or a group of patients over time. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis used. Eleven breast cancer patients were interviewed. The final thematic framework consisted of three major themes: (1) their ability to use published data to judge the size of differences in QOL scores, (2) their ability to gain familiarity and understanding of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire in an interview situation and (3) their ability to understand and assess differences from a group of patients rather than on an individual basis. Patients felt able to understand the questionnaire and scoring. They provided an opinion on whether differences in QOL scores were trivial, small, medium or large. Patient perspectives were often based on their own experience of the disease and treatments and their opinions were varied. In order to estimate clinically meaningful differences from published literature, a larger number of patients with varied experiences would be required and a consensus process used to align opinions where possible.

AB - This qualitative study piloted a method for eliciting patient opinion on the size of group differences in quality of life (QOL) scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Using scenarios from published studies, patients were asked the differences in QOL they would expect between two groups of patients or a group of patients over time. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis used. Eleven breast cancer patients were interviewed. The final thematic framework consisted of three major themes: (1) their ability to use published data to judge the size of differences in QOL scores, (2) their ability to gain familiarity and understanding of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire in an interview situation and (3) their ability to understand and assess differences from a group of patients rather than on an individual basis. Patients felt able to understand the questionnaire and scoring. They provided an opinion on whether differences in QOL scores were trivial, small, medium or large. Patient perspectives were often based on their own experience of the disease and treatments and their opinions were varied. In order to estimate clinically meaningful differences from published literature, a larger number of patients with varied experiences would be required and a consensus process used to align opinions where possible.

KW - Cancer

KW - Consensus

KW - Meaningful difference

KW - Patient opinion

KW - Qualitative interviews

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894800906&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ecc.12113

DO - 10.1111/ecc.12113

M3 - Article

C2 - 24033609

AN - SCOPUS:84894800906

VL - 23

SP - 228

EP - 238

JO - European Journal of Cancer Care

JF - European Journal of Cancer Care

SN - 0961-5423

IS - 2

ER -