Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)?

Kristen Tooley, Agnieszka Ewa Konopka, Duane Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 3 experiments, we investigated whether intonational phrase structure can be primed. In all experiments, participants listened to sentences in which the presence and location of intonational phrase boundaries were manipulated such that the recording included either no intonational phrase boundaries, a boundary in a structurally dispreferred location, a boundary in a preferred location, or boundaries in both locations. In Experiment 1, participants repeated the sentences to test whether they would reproduce the prosodic structure they had just heard. Experiments 2 and 3 used a prime–target paradigm to evaluate whether the intonational phrase structure heard in the prime sentence might influence that of a novel target sentence. Experiment 1 showed that participants did repeat back sentences that they had just heard with the original intonational phrase structure, yet Experiments 2 and 3 found that exposure to intonational phrase boundaries on prime trials did not influence how a novel target sentence was prosodically phrased. These results suggest that speakers may retain the intonational phrasing of a sentence, but this effect is not long-lived and does not generalize across unrelated sentences. Furthermore, these findings provide no evidence that intonational phrase structure is formulated during a planning stage that is separate from other sources of linguistic information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-363
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Linguistics
experiment
Intonational Phrase
Syntactic Structure
Phrase Structure
recording
Experiment
paradigm
linguistics
planning
evidence

Keywords

  • Prosodic structure
  • Priming

Cite this

Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)? / Tooley, Kristen; Konopka, Agnieszka Ewa; Watson, Duane.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 40, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 348-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9f61c6bc7f64d648d7462df040c33b6,
title = "Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)?",
abstract = "In 3 experiments, we investigated whether intonational phrase structure can be primed. In all experiments, participants listened to sentences in which the presence and location of intonational phrase boundaries were manipulated such that the recording included either no intonational phrase boundaries, a boundary in a structurally dispreferred location, a boundary in a preferred location, or boundaries in both locations. In Experiment 1, participants repeated the sentences to test whether they would reproduce the prosodic structure they had just heard. Experiments 2 and 3 used a prime–target paradigm to evaluate whether the intonational phrase structure heard in the prime sentence might influence that of a novel target sentence. Experiment 1 showed that participants did repeat back sentences that they had just heard with the original intonational phrase structure, yet Experiments 2 and 3 found that exposure to intonational phrase boundaries on prime trials did not influence how a novel target sentence was prosodically phrased. These results suggest that speakers may retain the intonational phrasing of a sentence, but this effect is not long-lived and does not generalize across unrelated sentences. Furthermore, these findings provide no evidence that intonational phrase structure is formulated during a planning stage that is separate from other sources of linguistic information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)",
keywords = "Prosodic structure, Priming",
author = "Kristen Tooley and Konopka, {Agnieszka Ewa} and Duane Watson",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0034900",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "348--363",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)?

AU - Tooley, Kristen

AU - Konopka, Agnieszka Ewa

AU - Watson, Duane

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - In 3 experiments, we investigated whether intonational phrase structure can be primed. In all experiments, participants listened to sentences in which the presence and location of intonational phrase boundaries were manipulated such that the recording included either no intonational phrase boundaries, a boundary in a structurally dispreferred location, a boundary in a preferred location, or boundaries in both locations. In Experiment 1, participants repeated the sentences to test whether they would reproduce the prosodic structure they had just heard. Experiments 2 and 3 used a prime–target paradigm to evaluate whether the intonational phrase structure heard in the prime sentence might influence that of a novel target sentence. Experiment 1 showed that participants did repeat back sentences that they had just heard with the original intonational phrase structure, yet Experiments 2 and 3 found that exposure to intonational phrase boundaries on prime trials did not influence how a novel target sentence was prosodically phrased. These results suggest that speakers may retain the intonational phrasing of a sentence, but this effect is not long-lived and does not generalize across unrelated sentences. Furthermore, these findings provide no evidence that intonational phrase structure is formulated during a planning stage that is separate from other sources of linguistic information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - In 3 experiments, we investigated whether intonational phrase structure can be primed. In all experiments, participants listened to sentences in which the presence and location of intonational phrase boundaries were manipulated such that the recording included either no intonational phrase boundaries, a boundary in a structurally dispreferred location, a boundary in a preferred location, or boundaries in both locations. In Experiment 1, participants repeated the sentences to test whether they would reproduce the prosodic structure they had just heard. Experiments 2 and 3 used a prime–target paradigm to evaluate whether the intonational phrase structure heard in the prime sentence might influence that of a novel target sentence. Experiment 1 showed that participants did repeat back sentences that they had just heard with the original intonational phrase structure, yet Experiments 2 and 3 found that exposure to intonational phrase boundaries on prime trials did not influence how a novel target sentence was prosodically phrased. These results suggest that speakers may retain the intonational phrasing of a sentence, but this effect is not long-lived and does not generalize across unrelated sentences. Furthermore, these findings provide no evidence that intonational phrase structure is formulated during a planning stage that is separate from other sources of linguistic information. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)

KW - Prosodic structure

KW - Priming

U2 - 10.1037/a0034900

DO - 10.1037/a0034900

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 348

EP - 363

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 2

ER -