Candidate selection, devolution and modernization

The selection of labour party candidates for the 1999 Scottish parliament and welsh assembly elections

Jonathan Bradbury*, James Mitchell, Lynn Bennie, David Denver

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article discusses four issues in the development of Labour Party candidate selection procedures for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections: how the procedures were originally decided; the creation of approved panels of candidates; the selection of constituency candidates; and the selection of list candidates. Each stage is assessed in terms of the implications for central control within the party, openness of nomination and participation in selection, and judged in terms of 'new politics' aspirations for party democratization against sceptical views of central party manipulation. Whilst there was generally widespread approval of moves towards gender balance the article shows that candidates were critical of all stages of selection in terms of unfairness and lack of democracy. The reasons for dissatisfaction, however, vary between Scotland and Wales. In Scotland central manipulation for ideological reasons was viewed as a consistent theme throughout the process, while in Wales specific criticism focused on the operation of the approval appeals process, the lack of policing of constituency selections, and central manipulation affecting in particular list selections for the specific purpose of facilitating Alun Michael's leadership of the Wales Labour Group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-172
Number of pages22
JournalBritish Elections and Parties Review
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Labour Party
parliament
decentralization
modernization
candidacy
election
manipulation
selection procedure
lack
democratization
appeal
criticism
leadership
democracy
labor
participation
politics
gender
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Candidate selection, devolution and modernization : The selection of labour party candidates for the 1999 Scottish parliament and welsh assembly elections. / Bradbury, Jonathan; Mitchell, James; Bennie, Lynn; Denver, David.

In: British Elections and Parties Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2000, p. 151-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6745dfc537394f3dacba0a1812b567a6,
title = "Candidate selection, devolution and modernization: The selection of labour party candidates for the 1999 Scottish parliament and welsh assembly elections",
abstract = "The article discusses four issues in the development of Labour Party candidate selection procedures for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections: how the procedures were originally decided; the creation of approved panels of candidates; the selection of constituency candidates; and the selection of list candidates. Each stage is assessed in terms of the implications for central control within the party, openness of nomination and participation in selection, and judged in terms of 'new politics' aspirations for party democratization against sceptical views of central party manipulation. Whilst there was generally widespread approval of moves towards gender balance the article shows that candidates were critical of all stages of selection in terms of unfairness and lack of democracy. The reasons for dissatisfaction, however, vary between Scotland and Wales. In Scotland central manipulation for ideological reasons was viewed as a consistent theme throughout the process, while in Wales specific criticism focused on the operation of the approval appeals process, the lack of policing of constituency selections, and central manipulation affecting in particular list selections for the specific purpose of facilitating Alun Michael's leadership of the Wales Labour Group.",
author = "Jonathan Bradbury and James Mitchell and Lynn Bennie and David Denver",
note = "This paper is based on research conducted with the assistance of ESRC grant number L3227253004. We are grateful to those who consented to be interviewed in the course of the research including Lesley Quinn, General Secretary of the Scottish Labour Party, Anita Gale, General Secretary of the Wales Labour Party and Andrew Davies, Special Projects Officer Wales Labour Party 1997-98. In addition, interviews were conducted with a number of candidates in both Scotland and Wales.",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/13689880008413042",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "151--172",
journal = "British Elections and Parties Review",
issn = "1368-9886",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Candidate selection, devolution and modernization

T2 - The selection of labour party candidates for the 1999 Scottish parliament and welsh assembly elections

AU - Bradbury, Jonathan

AU - Mitchell, James

AU - Bennie, Lynn

AU - Denver, David

N1 - This paper is based on research conducted with the assistance of ESRC grant number L3227253004. We are grateful to those who consented to be interviewed in the course of the research including Lesley Quinn, General Secretary of the Scottish Labour Party, Anita Gale, General Secretary of the Wales Labour Party and Andrew Davies, Special Projects Officer Wales Labour Party 1997-98. In addition, interviews were conducted with a number of candidates in both Scotland and Wales.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The article discusses four issues in the development of Labour Party candidate selection procedures for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections: how the procedures were originally decided; the creation of approved panels of candidates; the selection of constituency candidates; and the selection of list candidates. Each stage is assessed in terms of the implications for central control within the party, openness of nomination and participation in selection, and judged in terms of 'new politics' aspirations for party democratization against sceptical views of central party manipulation. Whilst there was generally widespread approval of moves towards gender balance the article shows that candidates were critical of all stages of selection in terms of unfairness and lack of democracy. The reasons for dissatisfaction, however, vary between Scotland and Wales. In Scotland central manipulation for ideological reasons was viewed as a consistent theme throughout the process, while in Wales specific criticism focused on the operation of the approval appeals process, the lack of policing of constituency selections, and central manipulation affecting in particular list selections for the specific purpose of facilitating Alun Michael's leadership of the Wales Labour Group.

AB - The article discusses four issues in the development of Labour Party candidate selection procedures for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections: how the procedures were originally decided; the creation of approved panels of candidates; the selection of constituency candidates; and the selection of list candidates. Each stage is assessed in terms of the implications for central control within the party, openness of nomination and participation in selection, and judged in terms of 'new politics' aspirations for party democratization against sceptical views of central party manipulation. Whilst there was generally widespread approval of moves towards gender balance the article shows that candidates were critical of all stages of selection in terms of unfairness and lack of democracy. The reasons for dissatisfaction, however, vary between Scotland and Wales. In Scotland central manipulation for ideological reasons was viewed as a consistent theme throughout the process, while in Wales specific criticism focused on the operation of the approval appeals process, the lack of policing of constituency selections, and central manipulation affecting in particular list selections for the specific purpose of facilitating Alun Michael's leadership of the Wales Labour Group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953656724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13689880008413042

DO - 10.1080/13689880008413042

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 151

EP - 172

JO - British Elections and Parties Review

JF - British Elections and Parties Review

SN - 1368-9886

IS - 1

ER -