Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated

P Smith, O Andren, T Karlsson, P Perala, K Regina, M Rounsevell, B van Wesemael

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Yearly, per-area carbon sequestration rates are used to estimate mitigation potentials by comparing types and areas of land management in 1990 and 2000 and projected to 2010, for the European Union (EU)-15 and for four country-level case studies for which data are available: UK, Sweden, Belgium and Finland. Because cropland area is decreasing in these countries (except for Belgium), and in most European countries there are no incentives in place to encourage soil carbon sequestration, carbon sequestration between 1990 and 2000 was small or negative in the EU-15 and all case study countries. Belgium has a slightly higher estimate for carbon sequestration than the other countries examined. This is at odds with previous reports of decreasing soil organic carbon stocks in Flanders. For all countries except Belgium, carbon sequestration is predicted to be negligible or negative by 2010, based on extrapolated trends, and is small even in Belgium. The only trend in agriculture that may be enhancing carbon stocks on croplands at present is organic farming, and the magnitude of this effect is highly uncertain.

Previous studies have focused on the potential for carbon sequestration and have shown quite significant potential. This study, which examines the sequestration likely to occur by 2010, suggests that the potential will not be realized. Without incentives for carbon sequestration in the future, cropland carbon sequestration under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol will not be an option in EU-15.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2153-2163
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • arable land
  • carbon mitigation
  • carbon sequestration
  • cropland management
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • soil organic carbon
  • CLIMATE-CHANGE COMMITMENTS
  • AGRICULTURAL LAND
  • MITIGATION
  • CO2
  • EMISSIONS
  • SOILS
  • UK

Cite this

Smith, P., Andren, O., Karlsson, T., Perala, P., Regina, K., Rounsevell, M., & van Wesemael, B. (2005). Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated. Global Change Biology, 11, 2153-2163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x

Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated. / Smith, P ; Andren, O ; Karlsson, T ; Perala, P ; Regina, K ; Rounsevell, M ; van Wesemael, B .

In: Global Change Biology, Vol. 11, 2005, p. 2153-2163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, P, Andren, O, Karlsson, T, Perala, P, Regina, K, Rounsevell, M & van Wesemael, B 2005, 'Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated' Global Change Biology, vol. 11, pp. 2153-2163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x
Smith, P ; Andren, O ; Karlsson, T ; Perala, P ; Regina, K ; Rounsevell, M ; van Wesemael, B . / Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated. In: Global Change Biology. 2005 ; Vol. 11. pp. 2153-2163.
@article{e1218c2ff0cd41309ac5b34ac73de747,
title = "Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated",
abstract = "Yearly, per-area carbon sequestration rates are used to estimate mitigation potentials by comparing types and areas of land management in 1990 and 2000 and projected to 2010, for the European Union (EU)-15 and for four country-level case studies for which data are available: UK, Sweden, Belgium and Finland. Because cropland area is decreasing in these countries (except for Belgium), and in most European countries there are no incentives in place to encourage soil carbon sequestration, carbon sequestration between 1990 and 2000 was small or negative in the EU-15 and all case study countries. Belgium has a slightly higher estimate for carbon sequestration than the other countries examined. This is at odds with previous reports of decreasing soil organic carbon stocks in Flanders. For all countries except Belgium, carbon sequestration is predicted to be negligible or negative by 2010, based on extrapolated trends, and is small even in Belgium. The only trend in agriculture that may be enhancing carbon stocks on croplands at present is organic farming, and the magnitude of this effect is highly uncertain.Previous studies have focused on the potential for carbon sequestration and have shown quite significant potential. This study, which examines the sequestration likely to occur by 2010, suggests that the potential will not be realized. Without incentives for carbon sequestration in the future, cropland carbon sequestration under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol will not be an option in EU-15.",
keywords = "arable land, carbon mitigation, carbon sequestration, cropland management, Kyoto Protocol, soil organic carbon, CLIMATE-CHANGE COMMITMENTS, AGRICULTURAL LAND, MITIGATION, CO2, EMISSIONS, SOILS, UK",
author = "P Smith and O Andren and T Karlsson and P Perala and K Regina and M Rounsevell and {van Wesemael}, B",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "2153--2163",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon sequestration potential in European croplands has been overestimated

AU - Smith, P

AU - Andren, O

AU - Karlsson, T

AU - Perala, P

AU - Regina, K

AU - Rounsevell, M

AU - van Wesemael, B

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Yearly, per-area carbon sequestration rates are used to estimate mitigation potentials by comparing types and areas of land management in 1990 and 2000 and projected to 2010, for the European Union (EU)-15 and for four country-level case studies for which data are available: UK, Sweden, Belgium and Finland. Because cropland area is decreasing in these countries (except for Belgium), and in most European countries there are no incentives in place to encourage soil carbon sequestration, carbon sequestration between 1990 and 2000 was small or negative in the EU-15 and all case study countries. Belgium has a slightly higher estimate for carbon sequestration than the other countries examined. This is at odds with previous reports of decreasing soil organic carbon stocks in Flanders. For all countries except Belgium, carbon sequestration is predicted to be negligible or negative by 2010, based on extrapolated trends, and is small even in Belgium. The only trend in agriculture that may be enhancing carbon stocks on croplands at present is organic farming, and the magnitude of this effect is highly uncertain.Previous studies have focused on the potential for carbon sequestration and have shown quite significant potential. This study, which examines the sequestration likely to occur by 2010, suggests that the potential will not be realized. Without incentives for carbon sequestration in the future, cropland carbon sequestration under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol will not be an option in EU-15.

AB - Yearly, per-area carbon sequestration rates are used to estimate mitigation potentials by comparing types and areas of land management in 1990 and 2000 and projected to 2010, for the European Union (EU)-15 and for four country-level case studies for which data are available: UK, Sweden, Belgium and Finland. Because cropland area is decreasing in these countries (except for Belgium), and in most European countries there are no incentives in place to encourage soil carbon sequestration, carbon sequestration between 1990 and 2000 was small or negative in the EU-15 and all case study countries. Belgium has a slightly higher estimate for carbon sequestration than the other countries examined. This is at odds with previous reports of decreasing soil organic carbon stocks in Flanders. For all countries except Belgium, carbon sequestration is predicted to be negligible or negative by 2010, based on extrapolated trends, and is small even in Belgium. The only trend in agriculture that may be enhancing carbon stocks on croplands at present is organic farming, and the magnitude of this effect is highly uncertain.Previous studies have focused on the potential for carbon sequestration and have shown quite significant potential. This study, which examines the sequestration likely to occur by 2010, suggests that the potential will not be realized. Without incentives for carbon sequestration in the future, cropland carbon sequestration under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol will not be an option in EU-15.

KW - arable land

KW - carbon mitigation

KW - carbon sequestration

KW - cropland management

KW - Kyoto Protocol

KW - soil organic carbon

KW - CLIMATE-CHANGE COMMITMENTS

KW - AGRICULTURAL LAND

KW - MITIGATION

KW - CO2

KW - EMISSIONS

KW - SOILS

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01052.x

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 2153

EP - 2163

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

ER -