Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers

Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice

Debbie Fielding*, Scott Newey, René van der Wal, R. Justin Irvine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of scavenger species have suffered population declines across Europe. In attempts to reverse their decline, some land and wildlife managers have adopted the practice of leaving or placing out carcasses of wild or domestic herbivores to provide a source of carrion. However, this can be a controversial practice, with as yet unclear outcomes for many target species and the ecosystems they are part of. Here we bring out the key aspects of this increasingly common conservation practice illustrated using three contrasting cases studies. We show that the provision of carcasses is often motivated by a desire to benefit charismatic species or to facilitate nutrient cycling throughout an ecosystem. Evidence for the effectiveness of this practice in achieving these objectives, however, is mostly lacking, with ecologists studying “easier” species groups such as beetles and therefore not providing relevant insights. Moreover, conflicts between environmental policies that carcass provisioning is aimed at and other social and economic objectives do occur but these projects are often designed without taking into account this broader context. We conclude that expecting carcasses to simply be “good for biodiversity” may be too naïve a view. A greater knowledge of the impact of carcass provisioning and placement on ecosystems and society at large is required before it can become a more effective conservation tool at a wider scale.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)810-819
Number of pages10
JournalAmbio
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

scavenger
nature conservation
Ecosystems
Conservation
conservation
ecosystem
Biodiversity
carrion
population decrease
Nutrients
Managers
population decline
nutrient cycling
environmental policy
biodiversity
herbivore
beetle
Economics
manager
economics

Keywords

  • Beliefs
  • Biodiversity
  • Conflict
  • Economics
  • Nutrients
  • Public perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology

Cite this

Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers : Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice. / Fielding, Debbie; Newey, Scott; van der Wal, René; Irvine, R. Justin.

In: Ambio, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.10.2014, p. 810-819.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Fielding, Debbie ; Newey, Scott ; van der Wal, René ; Irvine, R. Justin. / Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers : Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice. In: Ambio. 2014 ; Vol. 43, No. 6. pp. 810-819.
@article{572da3e30f18436c99768ed8fbb572d9,
title = "Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers: Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice",
abstract = "A number of scavenger species have suffered population declines across Europe. In attempts to reverse their decline, some land and wildlife managers have adopted the practice of leaving or placing out carcasses of wild or domestic herbivores to provide a source of carrion. However, this can be a controversial practice, with as yet unclear outcomes for many target species and the ecosystems they are part of. Here we bring out the key aspects of this increasingly common conservation practice illustrated using three contrasting cases studies. We show that the provision of carcasses is often motivated by a desire to benefit charismatic species or to facilitate nutrient cycling throughout an ecosystem. Evidence for the effectiveness of this practice in achieving these objectives, however, is mostly lacking, with ecologists studying “easier” species groups such as beetles and therefore not providing relevant insights. Moreover, conflicts between environmental policies that carcass provisioning is aimed at and other social and economic objectives do occur but these projects are often designed without taking into account this broader context. We conclude that expecting carcasses to simply be “good for biodiversity” may be too na{\"i}ve a view. A greater knowledge of the impact of carcass provisioning and placement on ecosystems and society at large is required before it can become a more effective conservation tool at a wider scale.",
keywords = "Beliefs, Biodiversity, Conflict, Economics, Nutrients, Public perception",
author = "Debbie Fielding and Scott Newey and {van der Wal}, Ren{\'e} and Irvine, {R. Justin}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13280-013-0469-4",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "810--819",
journal = "Ambio",
issn = "0044-7447",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers

T2 - Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice

AU - Fielding, Debbie

AU - Newey, Scott

AU - van der Wal, René

AU - Irvine, R. Justin

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - A number of scavenger species have suffered population declines across Europe. In attempts to reverse their decline, some land and wildlife managers have adopted the practice of leaving or placing out carcasses of wild or domestic herbivores to provide a source of carrion. However, this can be a controversial practice, with as yet unclear outcomes for many target species and the ecosystems they are part of. Here we bring out the key aspects of this increasingly common conservation practice illustrated using three contrasting cases studies. We show that the provision of carcasses is often motivated by a desire to benefit charismatic species or to facilitate nutrient cycling throughout an ecosystem. Evidence for the effectiveness of this practice in achieving these objectives, however, is mostly lacking, with ecologists studying “easier” species groups such as beetles and therefore not providing relevant insights. Moreover, conflicts between environmental policies that carcass provisioning is aimed at and other social and economic objectives do occur but these projects are often designed without taking into account this broader context. We conclude that expecting carcasses to simply be “good for biodiversity” may be too naïve a view. A greater knowledge of the impact of carcass provisioning and placement on ecosystems and society at large is required before it can become a more effective conservation tool at a wider scale.

AB - A number of scavenger species have suffered population declines across Europe. In attempts to reverse their decline, some land and wildlife managers have adopted the practice of leaving or placing out carcasses of wild or domestic herbivores to provide a source of carrion. However, this can be a controversial practice, with as yet unclear outcomes for many target species and the ecosystems they are part of. Here we bring out the key aspects of this increasingly common conservation practice illustrated using three contrasting cases studies. We show that the provision of carcasses is often motivated by a desire to benefit charismatic species or to facilitate nutrient cycling throughout an ecosystem. Evidence for the effectiveness of this practice in achieving these objectives, however, is mostly lacking, with ecologists studying “easier” species groups such as beetles and therefore not providing relevant insights. Moreover, conflicts between environmental policies that carcass provisioning is aimed at and other social and economic objectives do occur but these projects are often designed without taking into account this broader context. We conclude that expecting carcasses to simply be “good for biodiversity” may be too naïve a view. A greater knowledge of the impact of carcass provisioning and placement on ecosystems and society at large is required before it can become a more effective conservation tool at a wider scale.

KW - Beliefs

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Conflict

KW - Economics

KW - Nutrients

KW - Public perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908242815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-013-0469-4

DO - 10.1007/s13280-013-0469-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 43

SP - 810

EP - 819

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

SN - 0044-7447

IS - 6

ER -