Catch-up growth strategies differ between body structures

interactions between age and structure-specific growth in wild nestling Alpine Swifts

P. Bize*, N. B. Metcalfe, A. Roulin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Little is known on the occurrence and magnitude of faster than normal (catch-up) growth in response to periods of undernutrition in the wild, and the extent to which different body structures compensate and over what timescales is poorly understood.

2. We investigated catch-up growth in nestling Alpine Swifts, Apus melba, by comparing nestling growth trajectories in response to a naturally occurring 1-week period of inclement weather and undernutrition with growth of nestlings reared in a good year.

3. In response to undernutrition, nestlings exhibited a hierarchy of tissues preservation and compensation, with body mass being restored quickly after the end of the period of undernutrition, acceleration of skeletal growth occurring later in development, and compensation in wing length occurring mostly due to a prolongation of growth and delayed fledging.

4. The effect of undernutrition and subsequent catch-up growth was age-dependent, with older nestlings being more resilient to undernutrition, and in turn having less need to compensate later in the development.

5. This shows that young in a free-living bird population can compensate in body mass and body size for a naturally occurring period of undernutrition, and that the timing and extent of compensation varies with age and between body structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)857-864
Number of pages8
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

Keywords

  • apodidae
  • compensatory growth
  • developmental plasticity
  • food shortage
  • sibling competition
  • DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY
  • CARRION CROWS
  • COMPENSATION
  • FITNESS
  • LIFE
  • PROTEIN
  • START
  • FOOD
  • MASS

Cite this

Catch-up growth strategies differ between body structures : interactions between age and structure-specific growth in wild nestling Alpine Swifts. / Bize, P.; Metcalfe, N. B.; Roulin, A.

In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 10.2006, p. 857-864.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0be1b9083c6e4cd6adcc83935e799b11,
title = "Catch-up growth strategies differ between body structures: interactions between age and structure-specific growth in wild nestling Alpine Swifts",
abstract = "1. Little is known on the occurrence and magnitude of faster than normal (catch-up) growth in response to periods of undernutrition in the wild, and the extent to which different body structures compensate and over what timescales is poorly understood.2. We investigated catch-up growth in nestling Alpine Swifts, Apus melba, by comparing nestling growth trajectories in response to a naturally occurring 1-week period of inclement weather and undernutrition with growth of nestlings reared in a good year.3. In response to undernutrition, nestlings exhibited a hierarchy of tissues preservation and compensation, with body mass being restored quickly after the end of the period of undernutrition, acceleration of skeletal growth occurring later in development, and compensation in wing length occurring mostly due to a prolongation of growth and delayed fledging.4. The effect of undernutrition and subsequent catch-up growth was age-dependent, with older nestlings being more resilient to undernutrition, and in turn having less need to compensate later in the development.5. This shows that young in a free-living bird population can compensate in body mass and body size for a naturally occurring period of undernutrition, and that the timing and extent of compensation varies with age and between body structures.",
keywords = "apodidae, compensatory growth, developmental plasticity, food shortage, sibling competition, DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY, CARRION CROWS, COMPENSATION, FITNESS, LIFE, PROTEIN, START, FOOD, MASS",
author = "P. Bize and Metcalfe, {N. B.} and A. Roulin",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2435.2006.01157.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "857--864",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Catch-up growth strategies differ between body structures

T2 - interactions between age and structure-specific growth in wild nestling Alpine Swifts

AU - Bize, P.

AU - Metcalfe, N. B.

AU - Roulin, A.

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - 1. Little is known on the occurrence and magnitude of faster than normal (catch-up) growth in response to periods of undernutrition in the wild, and the extent to which different body structures compensate and over what timescales is poorly understood.2. We investigated catch-up growth in nestling Alpine Swifts, Apus melba, by comparing nestling growth trajectories in response to a naturally occurring 1-week period of inclement weather and undernutrition with growth of nestlings reared in a good year.3. In response to undernutrition, nestlings exhibited a hierarchy of tissues preservation and compensation, with body mass being restored quickly after the end of the period of undernutrition, acceleration of skeletal growth occurring later in development, and compensation in wing length occurring mostly due to a prolongation of growth and delayed fledging.4. The effect of undernutrition and subsequent catch-up growth was age-dependent, with older nestlings being more resilient to undernutrition, and in turn having less need to compensate later in the development.5. This shows that young in a free-living bird population can compensate in body mass and body size for a naturally occurring period of undernutrition, and that the timing and extent of compensation varies with age and between body structures.

AB - 1. Little is known on the occurrence and magnitude of faster than normal (catch-up) growth in response to periods of undernutrition in the wild, and the extent to which different body structures compensate and over what timescales is poorly understood.2. We investigated catch-up growth in nestling Alpine Swifts, Apus melba, by comparing nestling growth trajectories in response to a naturally occurring 1-week period of inclement weather and undernutrition with growth of nestlings reared in a good year.3. In response to undernutrition, nestlings exhibited a hierarchy of tissues preservation and compensation, with body mass being restored quickly after the end of the period of undernutrition, acceleration of skeletal growth occurring later in development, and compensation in wing length occurring mostly due to a prolongation of growth and delayed fledging.4. The effect of undernutrition and subsequent catch-up growth was age-dependent, with older nestlings being more resilient to undernutrition, and in turn having less need to compensate later in the development.5. This shows that young in a free-living bird population can compensate in body mass and body size for a naturally occurring period of undernutrition, and that the timing and extent of compensation varies with age and between body structures.

KW - apodidae

KW - compensatory growth

KW - developmental plasticity

KW - food shortage

KW - sibling competition

KW - DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY

KW - CARRION CROWS

KW - COMPENSATION

KW - FITNESS

KW - LIFE

KW - PROTEIN

KW - START

KW - FOOD

KW - MASS

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2435.2006.01157.x

DO - 10.1111/1365-2435.2006.01157.x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 857

EP - 864

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 5

ER -