Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

Patrick L. Ergina, Jonathan Alistair Cook, Jane M. Blazeby, Isabelle Boutron, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Barnaby C. Reeves, Christoph M. Seiler, Balliol Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

341 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1097-1104
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet
Volume374
Issue number9695
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Sep 2009

Keywords

  • Randomized controlled-trials
  • Complex interventions
  • Clinical-trials
  • Knowledge translation
  • Consort statement
  • Learning-curve
  • Surgery
  • Outcomes
  • Improve
  • Disease

Cite this

Ergina, P. L., Cook, J. A., Blazeby, J. M., Boutron, I., Clavien, P-A., Reeves, B. C., ... Balliol Collaboration (2009). Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. The Lancet, 374(9695), 1097-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2

Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. / Ergina, Patrick L.; Cook, Jonathan Alistair; Blazeby, Jane M.; Boutron, Isabelle; Clavien, Pierre-Alain; Reeves, Barnaby C.; Seiler, Christoph M.; Balliol Collaboration.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 374, No. 9695, 26.09.2009, p. 1097-1104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ergina, PL, Cook, JA, Blazeby, JM, Boutron, I, Clavien, P-A, Reeves, BC, Seiler, CM & Balliol Collaboration 2009, 'Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation', The Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9695, pp. 1097-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2
Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien P-A, Reeves BC et al. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. The Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2
Ergina, Patrick L. ; Cook, Jonathan Alistair ; Blazeby, Jane M. ; Boutron, Isabelle ; Clavien, Pierre-Alain ; Reeves, Barnaby C. ; Seiler, Christoph M. ; Balliol Collaboration. / Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. In: The Lancet. 2009 ; Vol. 374, No. 9695. pp. 1097-1104.
@article{3bc2a847432340fca409f94fda983612,
title = "Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation",
abstract = "Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.",
keywords = "Randomized controlled-trials, Complex interventions, Clinical-trials, Knowledge translation, Consort statement, Learning-curve, Surgery, Outcomes, Improve, Disease",
author = "Ergina, {Patrick L.} and Cook, {Jonathan Alistair} and Blazeby, {Jane M.} and Isabelle Boutron and Pierre-Alain Clavien and Reeves, {Barnaby C.} and Seiler, {Christoph M.} and {Balliol Collaboration}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2",
language = "English",
volume = "374",
pages = "1097--1104",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",
number = "9695",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

AU - Ergina, Patrick L.

AU - Cook, Jonathan Alistair

AU - Blazeby, Jane M.

AU - Boutron, Isabelle

AU - Clavien, Pierre-Alain

AU - Reeves, Barnaby C.

AU - Seiler, Christoph M.

AU - Balliol Collaboration

PY - 2009/9/26

Y1 - 2009/9/26

N2 - Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.

AB - Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures-for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.

KW - Randomized controlled-trials

KW - Complex interventions

KW - Clinical-trials

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Consort statement

KW - Learning-curve

KW - Surgery

KW - Outcomes

KW - Improve

KW - Disease

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2

M3 - Article

VL - 374

SP - 1097

EP - 1104

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9695

ER -