Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: International survey of investigators

Shazia H Chaudhry, Jamie C Brehaut, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Charles Weijer, Robert Boruch, Allan Donner, Martin P Eccles, Andrew D McRae, Raphael Saginur, Zoë C Skea, Merrick Zwarenstein, Monica Taljaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) complicate the interpretation of standard research ethics guidelines for several reasons. For one, the units of allocation, intervention, and observation often may differ within a single trial. In the absence of tailored and internationally accepted ethics guidelines for CRTs, researchers and research ethics committees have no common standard by which to judge ethically appropriate practices in CRTs. Moreover, lack of familiarity with and consideration of the unique features of the CRT design by research ethics committees may cause difficulties in the research ethics review process, and amplify problems such as variability in the requirements and decisions reached by different research ethics committees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-268
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Trials
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Research Ethics Committees
Research Personnel
Guidelines
Ethics
Observation
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Chaudhry, S. H., Brehaut, J. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Weijer, C., Boruch, R., Donner, A., ... Taljaard, M. (2013). Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: International survey of investigators. Clinical Trials, 10(2), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774513475530

Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials : International survey of investigators. / Chaudhry, Shazia H; Brehaut, Jamie C; Grimshaw, Jeremy M; Weijer, Charles; Boruch, Robert; Donner, Allan; Eccles, Martin P; McRae, Andrew D; Saginur, Raphael; Skea, Zoë C; Zwarenstein, Merrick; Taljaard, Monica.

In: Clinical Trials, Vol. 10, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 257-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chaudhry, SH, Brehaut, JC, Grimshaw, JM, Weijer, C, Boruch, R, Donner, A, Eccles, MP, McRae, AD, Saginur, R, Skea, ZC, Zwarenstein, M & Taljaard, M 2013, 'Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: International survey of investigators', Clinical Trials, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774513475530
Chaudhry, Shazia H ; Brehaut, Jamie C ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M ; Weijer, Charles ; Boruch, Robert ; Donner, Allan ; Eccles, Martin P ; McRae, Andrew D ; Saginur, Raphael ; Skea, Zoë C ; Zwarenstein, Merrick ; Taljaard, Monica. / Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials : International survey of investigators. In: Clinical Trials. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 257-268.
@article{d8ede510a1444853bfb8529ce9750faf,
title = "Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: International survey of investigators",
abstract = "Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) complicate the interpretation of standard research ethics guidelines for several reasons. For one, the units of allocation, intervention, and observation often may differ within a single trial. In the absence of tailored and internationally accepted ethics guidelines for CRTs, researchers and research ethics committees have no common standard by which to judge ethically appropriate practices in CRTs. Moreover, lack of familiarity with and consideration of the unique features of the CRT design by research ethics committees may cause difficulties in the research ethics review process, and amplify problems such as variability in the requirements and decisions reached by different research ethics committees.",
author = "Chaudhry, {Shazia H} and Brehaut, {Jamie C} and Grimshaw, {Jeremy M} and Charles Weijer and Robert Boruch and Allan Donner and Eccles, {Martin P} and McRae, {Andrew D} and Raphael Saginur and Skea, {Zo{\"e} C} and Merrick Zwarenstein and Monica Taljaard",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1740774513475530",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "257--268",
journal = "Clinical Trials",
issn = "1740-7745",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges in the research ethics review of cluster randomized trials

T2 - International survey of investigators

AU - Chaudhry, Shazia H

AU - Brehaut, Jamie C

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M

AU - Weijer, Charles

AU - Boruch, Robert

AU - Donner, Allan

AU - Eccles, Martin P

AU - McRae, Andrew D

AU - Saginur, Raphael

AU - Skea, Zoë C

AU - Zwarenstein, Merrick

AU - Taljaard, Monica

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) complicate the interpretation of standard research ethics guidelines for several reasons. For one, the units of allocation, intervention, and observation often may differ within a single trial. In the absence of tailored and internationally accepted ethics guidelines for CRTs, researchers and research ethics committees have no common standard by which to judge ethically appropriate practices in CRTs. Moreover, lack of familiarity with and consideration of the unique features of the CRT design by research ethics committees may cause difficulties in the research ethics review process, and amplify problems such as variability in the requirements and decisions reached by different research ethics committees.

AB - Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) complicate the interpretation of standard research ethics guidelines for several reasons. For one, the units of allocation, intervention, and observation often may differ within a single trial. In the absence of tailored and internationally accepted ethics guidelines for CRTs, researchers and research ethics committees have no common standard by which to judge ethically appropriate practices in CRTs. Moreover, lack of familiarity with and consideration of the unique features of the CRT design by research ethics committees may cause difficulties in the research ethics review process, and amplify problems such as variability in the requirements and decisions reached by different research ethics committees.

U2 - 10.1177/1740774513475530

DO - 10.1177/1740774513475530

M3 - Article

C2 - 23539109

VL - 10

SP - 257

EP - 268

JO - Clinical Trials

JF - Clinical Trials

SN - 1740-7745

IS - 2

ER -