Changing Current Practice in Urology: Improving Guideline Development and Implementation Through Stakeholder Engagement

Sara J. MacLennan, Steven MacLennan, Axel Bex, James W. F. Catto, Maria De Santis, Adam W. Glaser, Borje Ljungberg, James N'Dow, Karin Plass, Marta Trapero-Bertran, Hendrik Van Poppel, Penny Wright, Rachel H. Giles (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a consensus among practitioners that clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) improve care [1]. Moreover, CPGs empower patients to make informed health care choices, influence health care policies, promote distributive justice, and advocate better delivery of services. However, it is currently unclear how key stakeholders (eg, patients, carers, charitable organisations, health care funders) can be active in the development and implementation of guidelines in a meaningful way alongside the traditional clinical and methodological membership. The hurdle of including key non-medical stakeholders is perceived as substantial despite patient-focused outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-163
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume72
Issue number2
Early online date22 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Bibliographical note

RHG acknowledges support from the Dutch Kidney Foundation, grant CP11.13 “KOUNCIL”, and EU FP7 programme No. 305608 “EURenOmics”. The sponsors played a role in manuscript preparation.

Keywords

  • guidelines
  • clinical guideline development
  • patient organisation
  • renal cell carcinoma
  • stakeholder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changing Current Practice in Urology: Improving Guideline Development and Implementation Through Stakeholder Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this