Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model

reliability and precision of the method

Judith Meakin, Jenny Gregory, Francis Smith, Fiona Jane Gilbert, Richard Malcolm Aspden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of positional magnetic resonance images of normal volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability and precision of an active shape model to that of conventional lordosis measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Characterization of lumbar lordosis commonly relies on measurement of angles; these have been found to have errors of around 10 degrees . METHODS: T2 weighted sagittal images of the lumbar spines of 24 male volunteers in the standing posture were acquired using a positional magnetic resonance scanner. An active shape model of the vertebral bodies from S1 to L1 was created. Lumbar lordosis was also determined by measuring the angles of the superior endplates. All measurements were performed twice by one observer and once by a second observer. RESULTS: The shape model identified 2 modes of variation to describe the shape of the lumbar spine (mode 1 described curvature and mode 2 described evenness of curvature). Significant correlations were found between mode 1 and total lordosis (R = 0.97, P <0.001) and between mode 2 and mean absolute deviation of segmental lordosis (R = 0.80, P <0.001). Intra- and interobserver reliability was higher for the shape model (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.98-1.00) than for the lordosis angle measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.68-0.99). The relative error of the shape model (mode 1 = 4%; mode 2 = 9%) was lower than the conventional measurements (total lordosis = 10%). CONCLUSION: The shape of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane can be comprehensively characterized using a shape model. The results are more reliable and precise than measurements of lordosis calculated from endplate angles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)807-813
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Lordosis
Spine
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Posture
Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Lordosis
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Posture
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Software
  • lumber spine
  • positional MRI
  • active shape model

Cite this

Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model : reliability and precision of the method. / Meakin, Judith; Gregory, Jenny; Smith, Francis; Gilbert, Fiona Jane; Aspden, Richard Malcolm.

In: Spine, Vol. 33, No. 7, 01.04.2008, p. 807-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85ae99c8d678467d8d9d10ad363043c3,
title = "Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model: reliability and precision of the method",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of positional magnetic resonance images of normal volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability and precision of an active shape model to that of conventional lordosis measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Characterization of lumbar lordosis commonly relies on measurement of angles; these have been found to have errors of around 10 degrees . METHODS: T2 weighted sagittal images of the lumbar spines of 24 male volunteers in the standing posture were acquired using a positional magnetic resonance scanner. An active shape model of the vertebral bodies from S1 to L1 was created. Lumbar lordosis was also determined by measuring the angles of the superior endplates. All measurements were performed twice by one observer and once by a second observer. RESULTS: The shape model identified 2 modes of variation to describe the shape of the lumbar spine (mode 1 described curvature and mode 2 described evenness of curvature). Significant correlations were found between mode 1 and total lordosis (R = 0.97, P <0.001) and between mode 2 and mean absolute deviation of segmental lordosis (R = 0.80, P <0.001). Intra- and interobserver reliability was higher for the shape model (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.98-1.00) than for the lordosis angle measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.68-0.99). The relative error of the shape model (mode 1 = 4{\%}; mode 2 = 9{\%}) was lower than the conventional measurements (total lordosis = 10{\%}). CONCLUSION: The shape of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane can be comprehensively characterized using a shape model. The results are more reliable and precise than measurements of lordosis calculated from endplate angles.",
keywords = "Adult, Analysis of Variance, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lordosis, Lumbar Vertebrae, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Software, lumber spine, positional MRI, active shape model",
author = "Judith Meakin and Jenny Gregory and Francis Smith and Gilbert, {Fiona Jane} and Aspden, {Richard Malcolm}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816949e6",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "807--813",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing the shape of the lumbar spine using an active shape model

T2 - reliability and precision of the method

AU - Meakin, Judith

AU - Gregory, Jenny

AU - Smith, Francis

AU - Gilbert, Fiona Jane

AU - Aspden, Richard Malcolm

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of positional magnetic resonance images of normal volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability and precision of an active shape model to that of conventional lordosis measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Characterization of lumbar lordosis commonly relies on measurement of angles; these have been found to have errors of around 10 degrees . METHODS: T2 weighted sagittal images of the lumbar spines of 24 male volunteers in the standing posture were acquired using a positional magnetic resonance scanner. An active shape model of the vertebral bodies from S1 to L1 was created. Lumbar lordosis was also determined by measuring the angles of the superior endplates. All measurements were performed twice by one observer and once by a second observer. RESULTS: The shape model identified 2 modes of variation to describe the shape of the lumbar spine (mode 1 described curvature and mode 2 described evenness of curvature). Significant correlations were found between mode 1 and total lordosis (R = 0.97, P <0.001) and between mode 2 and mean absolute deviation of segmental lordosis (R = 0.80, P <0.001). Intra- and interobserver reliability was higher for the shape model (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.98-1.00) than for the lordosis angle measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.68-0.99). The relative error of the shape model (mode 1 = 4%; mode 2 = 9%) was lower than the conventional measurements (total lordosis = 10%). CONCLUSION: The shape of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane can be comprehensively characterized using a shape model. The results are more reliable and precise than measurements of lordosis calculated from endplate angles.

AB - STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of positional magnetic resonance images of normal volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability and precision of an active shape model to that of conventional lordosis measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Characterization of lumbar lordosis commonly relies on measurement of angles; these have been found to have errors of around 10 degrees . METHODS: T2 weighted sagittal images of the lumbar spines of 24 male volunteers in the standing posture were acquired using a positional magnetic resonance scanner. An active shape model of the vertebral bodies from S1 to L1 was created. Lumbar lordosis was also determined by measuring the angles of the superior endplates. All measurements were performed twice by one observer and once by a second observer. RESULTS: The shape model identified 2 modes of variation to describe the shape of the lumbar spine (mode 1 described curvature and mode 2 described evenness of curvature). Significant correlations were found between mode 1 and total lordosis (R = 0.97, P <0.001) and between mode 2 and mean absolute deviation of segmental lordosis (R = 0.80, P <0.001). Intra- and interobserver reliability was higher for the shape model (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.98-1.00) than for the lordosis angle measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.68-0.99). The relative error of the shape model (mode 1 = 4%; mode 2 = 9%) was lower than the conventional measurements (total lordosis = 10%). CONCLUSION: The shape of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane can be comprehensively characterized using a shape model. The results are more reliable and precise than measurements of lordosis calculated from endplate angles.

KW - Adult

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Humans

KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

KW - Lordosis

KW - Lumbar Vertebrae

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Posture

KW - Reference Values

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Software

KW - lumber spine

KW - positional MRI

KW - active shape model

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816949e6

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816949e6

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 807

EP - 813

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 7

ER -