Abstract
Iz okeana sjužetov, predložennyh v polemičeskoj, esli ne skazatʹ provokativnoj statʹe D.A. Baranova, ja ostanovljusʹ tolʹko na dvuh i sformuliruju ih kak voprosy. Byla li (ranne-)sovetskaja ètnografija takoj už nereljativnoj? I byli/estʹ li v nej teorii iz “polja”? Oba èti voprosa pereklikajutsja s temoj statʹi o Vladimire Bogoraze i ego proektah po dekolonizacii antropologičeskogo znanija, nad kotoroj ja rabotaju sejčas Poètomu predložennyj niže kommentarij – èto prežde vsego popytka vzgljanutʹ na rabotu Dmitrija Aleksandroviča čerez raboty i idei Vladimira Germanoviča, naskolʹko èto v principe vozmožno.
| Translated title of the contribution | Chukchi drawings of ethnographic relativism, or how Vladimir Germanovich could comment on Dmitry Alexandrovich's article |
|---|---|
| Original language | Russian |
| Pages (from-to) | 98-101 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Nov 2021 |
Bibliographical note
The work was supported by the ERC projects "Greening the Poles: Science, the Environment, and theCreation of the Modern Arctic and Antarctic" (GRETPOL) (led by Peder Roberts, Stavanger, Norway; Stockholm, Sweden) and the Russian Science Foundation projects "Arctic and Siberian Energy: Resource Use
Resource Use in the Context of Socioeconomic and Environmental Change" (No. 18-18-
00309) (led by Vladimir Davydov, St. Petersburg, Russia).
Keywords
- Bogoras
- relativity
- Chukchi
- Arctic
- history of anthropology