Chukotskie risunki ėtnograficheskogo reli͡ativizma, ili kak Vladimir Germanovich mog by prokommentirovat' stat'i͡u Dmitrii͡a Aleksandrovicha

Translated title of the contribution: Chukchi drawings of ethnographic relativism, or how Vladimir Germanovich could comment on Dmitry Alexandrovich's article

Dmitry Arzyutov* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Iz okeana sjužetov, predložennyh v polemičeskoj, esli ne skazatʹ provokativnoj statʹe D.A. Baranova, ja ostanovljusʹ tolʹko na dvuh i sformuliruju ih kak voprosy. Byla li (ranne-)sovetskaja ètnografija takoj už nereljativnoj? I byli/estʹ li v nej teorii iz “polja”? Oba èti voprosa pereklikajutsja s temoj statʹi o Vladimire Bogoraze i ego proektah po dekolonizacii antropologičeskogo znanija, nad kotoroj ja rabotaju sejčas Poètomu predložennyj niže kommentarij – èto prežde vsego popytka vzgljanutʹ na rabotu Dmitrija Aleksandroviča čerez raboty i idei Vladimira Germanoviča, naskolʹko èto v principe vozmožno.
Translated title of the contributionChukchi drawings of ethnographic relativism, or how Vladimir Germanovich could comment on Dmitry Alexandrovich's article
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)98-101
Number of pages4
JournalEtnograficheskoe Obozrenie
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Bogoras
  • relativity
  • Chukchi
  • Arctic
  • history of anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chukchi drawings of ethnographic relativism, or how Vladimir Germanovich could comment on Dmitry Alexandrovich's article'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this