"Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion"

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is a commonplace among scholars that religion is a problem or issue for
citizenship. Much has been said about what a citizen is to do with his or her
religion. In recent years, for example, scholars have written of a “post-secular”
world in which citizens are permitted to do more with their religion than hitherto, such as bringing it into politics. Some such as Jürgen Habermas (2008),
Tariq Modood (2009) and Charles Taylor (2007) have argued for such a world.
Others have warned against the advent of a “post-secular” world, such as
Rogers Brubaker (2013), who worries that religion is replacing language as a
dividing mark among citizens.
Unlike those scholars, this volume starts by treating “religion” not as a self-
evident phenomenon but instead as a category. Our modern idea of religion is
precisely that, we argue—an idea that has taken shape in modern times. As
I explained in the volume introduction, modernity has multiple histories and
so does the modern idea of religion. The volume focuses on the history of how
governments from the eighteenth century onwards came to define “religion.”
I begin this chapter by arguing that when modern governments reworked the
category of religion, they also reworked what it meant to be “citizens.”
Governments made increasing demands on those whom they recognized as
citizens. One of the key demands made of citizens was that they take a particular stance toward “religion.”
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReligion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty
EditorsTrevor Stack, Naomi Goldenberg, Timothy Fitzgerald
Place of PublicationLeiden
PublisherBrill
Pages38-67
Number of pages30
ISBN (Electronic)9789004290594
ISBN (Print)9789004290556
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Stance
Religion
Government
Postsecular
History
Secular World
Charles Taylor
Commonplaces
Modernity
Citizenship
Modern Times
Language

Cite this

Stack, T. R. (2015). "Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion". In T. Stack, N. Goldenberg, & T. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty (pp. 38-67). Leiden: Brill.

"Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion". / Stack, Trevor Rowan.

Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty. ed. / Trevor Stack; Naomi Goldenberg; Timothy Fitzgerald. Leiden : Brill, 2015. p. 38-67.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Stack, TR 2015, "Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion". in T Stack, N Goldenberg & T Fitzgerald (eds), Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty. Brill, Leiden, pp. 38-67.
Stack TR. "Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion". In Stack T, Goldenberg N, Fitzgerald T, editors, Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty. Leiden: Brill. 2015. p. 38-67
Stack, Trevor Rowan. / "Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion". Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty. editor / Trevor Stack ; Naomi Goldenberg ; Timothy Fitzgerald. Leiden : Brill, 2015. pp. 38-67
@inbook{175c619c36a548e5ae1cc3f9be3fd352,
title = "{"}Citizens{"} and their Stance Toward {"}Religion{"}",
abstract = "It is a commonplace among scholars that religion is a problem or issue for citizenship. Much has been said about what a citizen is to do with his or her religion. In recent years, for example, scholars have written of a “post-secular” world in which citizens are permitted to do more with their religion than hitherto, such as bringing it into politics. Some such as J{\"u}rgen Habermas (2008), Tariq Modood (2009) and Charles Taylor (2007) have argued for such a world. Others have warned against the advent of a “post-secular” world, such as Rogers Brubaker (2013), who worries that religion is replacing language as a dividing mark among citizens.Unlike those scholars, this volume starts by treating “religion” not as a self-evident phenomenon but instead as a category. Our modern idea of religion is precisely that, we argue—an idea that has taken shape in modern times. As I explained in the volume introduction, modernity has multiple histories and so does the modern idea of religion. The volume focuses on the history of how governments from the eighteenth century onwards came to define “religion.” I begin this chapter by arguing that when modern governments reworked the category of religion, they also reworked what it meant to be “citizens.” Governments made increasing demands on those whom they recognized as citizens. One of the key demands made of citizens was that they take a particular stance toward “religion.”",
author = "Stack, {Trevor Rowan}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004290556",
pages = "38--67",
editor = "Trevor Stack and Naomi Goldenberg and Timothy Fitzgerald",
booktitle = "Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty",
publisher = "Brill",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - "Citizens" and their Stance Toward "Religion"

AU - Stack, Trevor Rowan

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - It is a commonplace among scholars that religion is a problem or issue for citizenship. Much has been said about what a citizen is to do with his or her religion. In recent years, for example, scholars have written of a “post-secular” world in which citizens are permitted to do more with their religion than hitherto, such as bringing it into politics. Some such as Jürgen Habermas (2008), Tariq Modood (2009) and Charles Taylor (2007) have argued for such a world. Others have warned against the advent of a “post-secular” world, such as Rogers Brubaker (2013), who worries that religion is replacing language as a dividing mark among citizens.Unlike those scholars, this volume starts by treating “religion” not as a self-evident phenomenon but instead as a category. Our modern idea of religion is precisely that, we argue—an idea that has taken shape in modern times. As I explained in the volume introduction, modernity has multiple histories and so does the modern idea of religion. The volume focuses on the history of how governments from the eighteenth century onwards came to define “religion.” I begin this chapter by arguing that when modern governments reworked the category of religion, they also reworked what it meant to be “citizens.” Governments made increasing demands on those whom they recognized as citizens. One of the key demands made of citizens was that they take a particular stance toward “religion.”

AB - It is a commonplace among scholars that religion is a problem or issue for citizenship. Much has been said about what a citizen is to do with his or her religion. In recent years, for example, scholars have written of a “post-secular” world in which citizens are permitted to do more with their religion than hitherto, such as bringing it into politics. Some such as Jürgen Habermas (2008), Tariq Modood (2009) and Charles Taylor (2007) have argued for such a world. Others have warned against the advent of a “post-secular” world, such as Rogers Brubaker (2013), who worries that religion is replacing language as a dividing mark among citizens.Unlike those scholars, this volume starts by treating “religion” not as a self-evident phenomenon but instead as a category. Our modern idea of religion is precisely that, we argue—an idea that has taken shape in modern times. As I explained in the volume introduction, modernity has multiple histories and so does the modern idea of religion. The volume focuses on the history of how governments from the eighteenth century onwards came to define “religion.” I begin this chapter by arguing that when modern governments reworked the category of religion, they also reworked what it meant to be “citizens.” Governments made increasing demands on those whom they recognized as citizens. One of the key demands made of citizens was that they take a particular stance toward “religion.”

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789004290556

SP - 38

EP - 67

BT - Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty

A2 - Stack, Trevor

A2 - Goldenberg, Naomi

A2 - Fitzgerald, Timothy

PB - Brill

CY - Leiden

ER -