Clinical outcomes from a randomised comparison of Microwave Endometrial Ablation with Thermal Balloon endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

A M Sambrook, K G Cooper, M K Campbell, J A Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Design  A double blind randomised controlled trial.Setting  A UK teaching hospital.Population  Three hundred and twenty women requesting endometrial ablation.Methods  Operative data collection and patient completed postal questionnaires were used to ascertain women’s satisfaction with outcome, acceptability of each procedure, changes in menstrual symptoms and health related quality of life and additional treatments received.Main outcome measures  Primary outcomes were satisfaction and menstrual scores 1 year. Secondary outcomes were operative differences, acceptability of treatment and changes in health related quality of life.Results  Both technologies achieved high levels of satisfaction (−1%, 95% CI (−11, 9)). Menstrual scores were also similar (4%, 95% CI (−7, 19)) Microwave had a significantly shorter operating time, reduced usage of antiemetics and opiate analgesia, increased discharge by 6 hours and fewer device failures.Conclusions  Both treatments are acceptable to women, with high levels of satisfaction. Microwave is quicker to perform with faster hospital discharge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1038-1045
Number of pages8
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume116
Issue number8
Early online date11 May 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Keywords

  • menorrhagia
  • randomised trial
  • surgical treatments
  • quality-of-life
  • controlled-trial
  • rollerball electroablation
  • abdominal hysterectomy
  • satisfaction rate
  • resection
  • destruction
  • efficacy

Cite this

@article{4cab933f545a4aa1bd091bb5bcf5e8e7,
title = "Clinical outcomes from a randomised comparison of Microwave Endometrial Ablation with Thermal Balloon endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding",
abstract = "Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Design  A double blind randomised controlled trial.Setting  A UK teaching hospital.Population  Three hundred and twenty women requesting endometrial ablation.Methods  Operative data collection and patient completed postal questionnaires were used to ascertain women’s satisfaction with outcome, acceptability of each procedure, changes in menstrual symptoms and health related quality of life and additional treatments received.Main outcome measures  Primary outcomes were satisfaction and menstrual scores 1 year. Secondary outcomes were operative differences, acceptability of treatment and changes in health related quality of life.Results  Both technologies achieved high levels of satisfaction (−1{\%}, 95{\%} CI (−11, 9)). Menstrual scores were also similar (4{\%}, 95{\%} CI (−7, 19)) Microwave had a significantly shorter operating time, reduced usage of antiemetics and opiate analgesia, increased discharge by 6 hours and fewer device failures.Conclusions  Both treatments are acceptable to women, with high levels of satisfaction. Microwave is quicker to perform with faster hospital discharge.",
keywords = "menorrhagia, randomised trial, surgical treatments, quality-of-life, controlled-trial, rollerball electroablation, abdominal hysterectomy, satisfaction rate, resection, destruction, efficacy",
author = "Sambrook, {A M} and Cooper, {K G} and Campbell, {M K} and Cook, {J A}",
note = "The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02181.x",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "1038--1045",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcomes from a randomised comparison of Microwave Endometrial Ablation with Thermal Balloon endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

AU - Sambrook, A M

AU - Cooper, K G

AU - Campbell, M K

AU - Cook, J A

N1 - The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Design  A double blind randomised controlled trial.Setting  A UK teaching hospital.Population  Three hundred and twenty women requesting endometrial ablation.Methods  Operative data collection and patient completed postal questionnaires were used to ascertain women’s satisfaction with outcome, acceptability of each procedure, changes in menstrual symptoms and health related quality of life and additional treatments received.Main outcome measures  Primary outcomes were satisfaction and menstrual scores 1 year. Secondary outcomes were operative differences, acceptability of treatment and changes in health related quality of life.Results  Both technologies achieved high levels of satisfaction (−1%, 95% CI (−11, 9)). Menstrual scores were also similar (4%, 95% CI (−7, 19)) Microwave had a significantly shorter operating time, reduced usage of antiemetics and opiate analgesia, increased discharge by 6 hours and fewer device failures.Conclusions  Both treatments are acceptable to women, with high levels of satisfaction. Microwave is quicker to perform with faster hospital discharge.

AB - Objective  To compare the clinical outcomes of microwave endometrial ablation and thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Design  A double blind randomised controlled trial.Setting  A UK teaching hospital.Population  Three hundred and twenty women requesting endometrial ablation.Methods  Operative data collection and patient completed postal questionnaires were used to ascertain women’s satisfaction with outcome, acceptability of each procedure, changes in menstrual symptoms and health related quality of life and additional treatments received.Main outcome measures  Primary outcomes were satisfaction and menstrual scores 1 year. Secondary outcomes were operative differences, acceptability of treatment and changes in health related quality of life.Results  Both technologies achieved high levels of satisfaction (−1%, 95% CI (−11, 9)). Menstrual scores were also similar (4%, 95% CI (−7, 19)) Microwave had a significantly shorter operating time, reduced usage of antiemetics and opiate analgesia, increased discharge by 6 hours and fewer device failures.Conclusions  Both treatments are acceptable to women, with high levels of satisfaction. Microwave is quicker to perform with faster hospital discharge.

KW - menorrhagia

KW - randomised trial

KW - surgical treatments

KW - quality-of-life

KW - controlled-trial

KW - rollerball electroablation

KW - abdominal hysterectomy

KW - satisfaction rate

KW - resection

KW - destruction

KW - efficacy

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02181.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02181.x

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 1038

EP - 1045

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 8

ER -