Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture

a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy

A.p. Thorpe, Alison Dorothy Murray, Francis Smith, James Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

59 patients with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fracture, but negative radiographs at presentation and review, were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS). The diagnoses were compared with subsequent follow-up. There were four scaphoid fractures, 10 other fractures and three significant ligamentous injuries. All scaphoid fractures were identified by MRI and BS. MRI showed better interobserver agreement for scaphoid injury than BS and fewer false positive reports. Significant ligamentous injury and carpal instability diagnosed by MRI were not evident on scintigraphy. Using fast scanning protocols the cost of MRI is comparable with that of BS. MRI should be considered as the appropriate second line investigation in these clinical circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-113
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Radionuclide Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Bone and Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Scaphoid Bone
Wrist
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture : a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy. / Thorpe, A.p.; Murray, Alison Dorothy; Smith, Francis; Ferguson, James.

In: British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 69, 1996, p. 109-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cd986a6172f495cb819a5b81578df3e,
title = "Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture: a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy",
abstract = "59 patients with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fracture, but negative radiographs at presentation and review, were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS). The diagnoses were compared with subsequent follow-up. There were four scaphoid fractures, 10 other fractures and three significant ligamentous injuries. All scaphoid fractures were identified by MRI and BS. MRI showed better interobserver agreement for scaphoid injury than BS and fewer false positive reports. Significant ligamentous injury and carpal instability diagnosed by MRI were not evident on scintigraphy. Using fast scanning protocols the cost of MRI is comparable with that of BS. MRI should be considered as the appropriate second line investigation in these clinical circumstances.",
author = "A.p. Thorpe and Murray, {Alison Dorothy} and Francis Smith and James Ferguson",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-109",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "109--113",
journal = "British Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0007-1285",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinically suspected scaphoid fracture

T2 - a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy

AU - Thorpe, A.p.

AU - Murray, Alison Dorothy

AU - Smith, Francis

AU - Ferguson, James

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - 59 patients with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fracture, but negative radiographs at presentation and review, were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS). The diagnoses were compared with subsequent follow-up. There were four scaphoid fractures, 10 other fractures and three significant ligamentous injuries. All scaphoid fractures were identified by MRI and BS. MRI showed better interobserver agreement for scaphoid injury than BS and fewer false positive reports. Significant ligamentous injury and carpal instability diagnosed by MRI were not evident on scintigraphy. Using fast scanning protocols the cost of MRI is comparable with that of BS. MRI should be considered as the appropriate second line investigation in these clinical circumstances.

AB - 59 patients with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fracture, but negative radiographs at presentation and review, were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS). The diagnoses were compared with subsequent follow-up. There were four scaphoid fractures, 10 other fractures and three significant ligamentous injuries. All scaphoid fractures were identified by MRI and BS. MRI showed better interobserver agreement for scaphoid injury than BS and fewer false positive reports. Significant ligamentous injury and carpal instability diagnosed by MRI were not evident on scintigraphy. Using fast scanning protocols the cost of MRI is comparable with that of BS. MRI should be considered as the appropriate second line investigation in these clinical circumstances.

U2 - 10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-109

DO - 10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-109

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 109

EP - 113

JO - British Journal of Radiology

JF - British Journal of Radiology

SN - 0007-1285

ER -