Close relationships and health in daily life

a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms

Gertraud Stadler, Kenzie A Snyder, Andrea B Horn, Patrick E Shrout, Niall P Bolger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review research on close relationships and health in daily life, with a focus on physiological functioning and somatic symptoms, and to present data on the within-person effects of physical intimacy on somatic symptoms in committed couples' daily life. The empirical study tested whether prior change in physical intimacy predicted subsequent change in symptoms, over and above their concurrent association. In addition, the study tested if increasing and decreasing intimacy had asymmetric effects on symptom change.

METHODS: In this study, 164 participants in 82 committed couples reported physical intimacy and somatic symptoms once a day for 33 days.

RESULTS: Prior within-person change in intimacy predicted a subsequent reduction in symptoms; when a person's intimacy increased from one day to the next day, then symptoms decreased over the following days (B = -0.098, standard error [SE] = 0.038, p = .013). This lagged effect of intimacy held over and above the association of concurrent change in intimacy and symptoms (B = -0.122, SE = 0.041, p = .004). The study found asymmetric effects of prior increase and decrease in intimacy; prior intimacy increase predicted reduced subsequent symptoms (B = -0.189, SE = 0.068, p = .047), whereas prior intimacy decrease was unrelated to subsequent symptoms (B = -0.003, SE = 0.063, not significant). There was no evidence for asymmetric effects of intimacy increase and decrease on concurrent symptom change.

CONCLUSIONS: Close relationships exert influences on health in daily life, and part of this influence is due to intimacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-409
Number of pages12
JournalPsychosomatic Medicine
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Medically Unexplained Symptoms

Keywords

  • Causality
  • Family Characteristics
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Prospective Studies
  • Research Design
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Somatoform Disorders
  • Time Factors
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Cite this

Close relationships and health in daily life : a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms. / Stadler, Gertraud; Snyder, Kenzie A; Horn, Andrea B; Shrout, Patrick E; Bolger, Niall P.

In: Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol. 74, No. 4, 05.2012, p. 398-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stadler, Gertraud ; Snyder, Kenzie A ; Horn, Andrea B ; Shrout, Patrick E ; Bolger, Niall P. / Close relationships and health in daily life : a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms. In: Psychosomatic Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 74, No. 4. pp. 398-409.
@article{9f356e816d2e46a6afa9525fd003a6d4,
title = "Close relationships and health in daily life: a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To review research on close relationships and health in daily life, with a focus on physiological functioning and somatic symptoms, and to present data on the within-person effects of physical intimacy on somatic symptoms in committed couples' daily life. The empirical study tested whether prior change in physical intimacy predicted subsequent change in symptoms, over and above their concurrent association. In addition, the study tested if increasing and decreasing intimacy had asymmetric effects on symptom change.METHODS: In this study, 164 participants in 82 committed couples reported physical intimacy and somatic symptoms once a day for 33 days.RESULTS: Prior within-person change in intimacy predicted a subsequent reduction in symptoms; when a person's intimacy increased from one day to the next day, then symptoms decreased over the following days (B = -0.098, standard error [SE] = 0.038, p = .013). This lagged effect of intimacy held over and above the association of concurrent change in intimacy and symptoms (B = -0.122, SE = 0.041, p = .004). The study found asymmetric effects of prior increase and decrease in intimacy; prior intimacy increase predicted reduced subsequent symptoms (B = -0.189, SE = 0.068, p = .047), whereas prior intimacy decrease was unrelated to subsequent symptoms (B = -0.003, SE = 0.063, not significant). There was no evidence for asymmetric effects of intimacy increase and decrease on concurrent symptom change.CONCLUSIONS: Close relationships exert influences on health in daily life, and part of this influence is due to intimacy.",
keywords = "Causality, Family Characteristics, Female, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Theoretical, Prospective Studies, Research Design, Sexual Behavior, Somatoform Disorders, Time Factors, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Gertraud Stadler and Snyder, {Kenzie A} and Horn, {Andrea B} and Shrout, {Patrick E} and Bolger, {Niall P}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825473b8",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "398--409",
journal = "Psychosomatic Medicine",
issn = "0033-3174",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Close relationships and health in daily life

T2 - a review and empirical data on intimacy and somatic symptoms

AU - Stadler, Gertraud

AU - Snyder, Kenzie A

AU - Horn, Andrea B

AU - Shrout, Patrick E

AU - Bolger, Niall P

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To review research on close relationships and health in daily life, with a focus on physiological functioning and somatic symptoms, and to present data on the within-person effects of physical intimacy on somatic symptoms in committed couples' daily life. The empirical study tested whether prior change in physical intimacy predicted subsequent change in symptoms, over and above their concurrent association. In addition, the study tested if increasing and decreasing intimacy had asymmetric effects on symptom change.METHODS: In this study, 164 participants in 82 committed couples reported physical intimacy and somatic symptoms once a day for 33 days.RESULTS: Prior within-person change in intimacy predicted a subsequent reduction in symptoms; when a person's intimacy increased from one day to the next day, then symptoms decreased over the following days (B = -0.098, standard error [SE] = 0.038, p = .013). This lagged effect of intimacy held over and above the association of concurrent change in intimacy and symptoms (B = -0.122, SE = 0.041, p = .004). The study found asymmetric effects of prior increase and decrease in intimacy; prior intimacy increase predicted reduced subsequent symptoms (B = -0.189, SE = 0.068, p = .047), whereas prior intimacy decrease was unrelated to subsequent symptoms (B = -0.003, SE = 0.063, not significant). There was no evidence for asymmetric effects of intimacy increase and decrease on concurrent symptom change.CONCLUSIONS: Close relationships exert influences on health in daily life, and part of this influence is due to intimacy.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To review research on close relationships and health in daily life, with a focus on physiological functioning and somatic symptoms, and to present data on the within-person effects of physical intimacy on somatic symptoms in committed couples' daily life. The empirical study tested whether prior change in physical intimacy predicted subsequent change in symptoms, over and above their concurrent association. In addition, the study tested if increasing and decreasing intimacy had asymmetric effects on symptom change.METHODS: In this study, 164 participants in 82 committed couples reported physical intimacy and somatic symptoms once a day for 33 days.RESULTS: Prior within-person change in intimacy predicted a subsequent reduction in symptoms; when a person's intimacy increased from one day to the next day, then symptoms decreased over the following days (B = -0.098, standard error [SE] = 0.038, p = .013). This lagged effect of intimacy held over and above the association of concurrent change in intimacy and symptoms (B = -0.122, SE = 0.041, p = .004). The study found asymmetric effects of prior increase and decrease in intimacy; prior intimacy increase predicted reduced subsequent symptoms (B = -0.189, SE = 0.068, p = .047), whereas prior intimacy decrease was unrelated to subsequent symptoms (B = -0.003, SE = 0.063, not significant). There was no evidence for asymmetric effects of intimacy increase and decrease on concurrent symptom change.CONCLUSIONS: Close relationships exert influences on health in daily life, and part of this influence is due to intimacy.

KW - Causality

KW - Family Characteristics

KW - Female

KW - Health Status

KW - Health Status Indicators

KW - Humans

KW - Interpersonal Relations

KW - Male

KW - Models, Theoretical

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Research Design

KW - Sexual Behavior

KW - Somatoform Disorders

KW - Time Factors

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825473b8

DO - 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31825473b8

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 398

EP - 409

JO - Psychosomatic Medicine

JF - Psychosomatic Medicine

SN - 0033-3174

IS - 4

ER -