Clustering in surgical trials

database of intracluster correlations

Jonathan A Cook, Thomas Bruckner, Graeme S MacLennan, Christoph M Seiler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.

METHODS: Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for outcomes from a set of 10 multicentre surgical trials for a range of outcomes and different time points for clustering at both the centre and surgeon level.

RESULTS: ICCs were calculated for 198 outcomes across the 10 trials at both centre and surgeon cluster levels. The number of cases varied from 138 to 1370 across the trials. The median (range) average cluster size was 32 (9 to 51) and 6 (3 to 30) for centre and surgeon levels respectively. ICC estimates varied substantially between outcome type though uncertainty around individual ICC estimates was substantial, which was reflected in generally wide confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS: This database of surgical trials provides trialists with valuable information on how to design surgical trials. Our data suggests clustering of outcome is more of an issue than has been previously acknowledged. We anticipate that over time the addition of ICCs from further surgical trial datasets to our database will further inform the design of surgical trials.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages8
JournalTrials
Volume13
Issue number-
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Cluster Analysis
Databases
Surgeons
Sample Size
Multicenter Studies
Uncertainty
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • surgery
  • ICC
  • multicentre
  • clustering

Cite this

Clustering in surgical trials : database of intracluster correlations. / Cook, Jonathan A; Bruckner, Thomas; MacLennan, Graeme S; Seiler, Christoph M.

In: Trials, Vol. 13, No. -, 2, 04.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, Jonathan A ; Bruckner, Thomas ; MacLennan, Graeme S ; Seiler, Christoph M. / Clustering in surgical trials : database of intracluster correlations. In: Trials. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. -.
@article{b83c0598f40d402baf7c0c52dd41ad7d,
title = "Clustering in surgical trials: database of intracluster correlations",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.METHODS: Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for outcomes from a set of 10 multicentre surgical trials for a range of outcomes and different time points for clustering at both the centre and surgeon level.RESULTS: ICCs were calculated for 198 outcomes across the 10 trials at both centre and surgeon cluster levels. The number of cases varied from 138 to 1370 across the trials. The median (range) average cluster size was 32 (9 to 51) and 6 (3 to 30) for centre and surgeon levels respectively. ICC estimates varied substantially between outcome type though uncertainty around individual ICC estimates was substantial, which was reflected in generally wide confidence intervals.CONCLUSIONS: This database of surgical trials provides trialists with valuable information on how to design surgical trials. Our data suggests clustering of outcome is more of an issue than has been previously acknowledged. We anticipate that over time the addition of ICCs from further surgical trial datasets to our database will further inform the design of surgical trials.",
keywords = "surgery, ICC, multicentre, clustering",
author = "Cook, {Jonathan A} and Thomas Bruckner and MacLennan, {Graeme S} and Seiler, {Christoph M}",
note = "PMID: 22217216 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PMCID: PMC3311136 Free PMC Article",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-13-2",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "-",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clustering in surgical trials

T2 - database of intracluster correlations

AU - Cook, Jonathan A

AU - Bruckner, Thomas

AU - MacLennan, Graeme S

AU - Seiler, Christoph M

N1 - PMID: 22217216 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] PMCID: PMC3311136 Free PMC Article

PY - 2012/1/4

Y1 - 2012/1/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.METHODS: Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for outcomes from a set of 10 multicentre surgical trials for a range of outcomes and different time points for clustering at both the centre and surgeon level.RESULTS: ICCs were calculated for 198 outcomes across the 10 trials at both centre and surgeon cluster levels. The number of cases varied from 138 to 1370 across the trials. The median (range) average cluster size was 32 (9 to 51) and 6 (3 to 30) for centre and surgeon levels respectively. ICC estimates varied substantially between outcome type though uncertainty around individual ICC estimates was substantial, which was reflected in generally wide confidence intervals.CONCLUSIONS: This database of surgical trials provides trialists with valuable information on how to design surgical trials. Our data suggests clustering of outcome is more of an issue than has been previously acknowledged. We anticipate that over time the addition of ICCs from further surgical trial datasets to our database will further inform the design of surgical trials.

AB - BACKGROUND: Randomised trials evaluation of surgical interventions are often designed and analysed as if the outcome of individual patients is independent of the surgeon providing the intervention. There is reason to expect outcomes for patients treated by the same surgeon tend to be more similar than those under the care of another surgeon due to previous experience, individual practice, training, and infrastructure. Such a phenomenon is referred to as the clustering effect and potentially impacts on the design and analysis adopted and thereby the required sample size. The aim of this work was to inform trial design by quantifying clustering effects (at both centre and surgeon level) for various outcomes using a database of surgical trials.METHODS: Intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for outcomes from a set of 10 multicentre surgical trials for a range of outcomes and different time points for clustering at both the centre and surgeon level.RESULTS: ICCs were calculated for 198 outcomes across the 10 trials at both centre and surgeon cluster levels. The number of cases varied from 138 to 1370 across the trials. The median (range) average cluster size was 32 (9 to 51) and 6 (3 to 30) for centre and surgeon levels respectively. ICC estimates varied substantially between outcome type though uncertainty around individual ICC estimates was substantial, which was reflected in generally wide confidence intervals.CONCLUSIONS: This database of surgical trials provides trialists with valuable information on how to design surgical trials. Our data suggests clustering of outcome is more of an issue than has been previously acknowledged. We anticipate that over time the addition of ICCs from further surgical trial datasets to our database will further inform the design of surgical trials.

KW - surgery

KW - ICC

KW - multicentre

KW - clustering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855261156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-13-2

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-13-2

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - -

M1 - 2

ER -