Coalition and Minority Government in Scotland

Lessons for the United Kingdom

Paul Alexander Cairney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The United Kingdom general election result in 2010 produced a hung or balanced parliament for the first time in over three decades. Since the United Kingdom has limited postwar experience of this outcome, it is natural that commentators have begun to look elsewhere for lessons on the practicalities of minority and coalition government. This article considers the lessons we can learn from the Scottish parliamentary experience since 1999. It outlines two main points of comparison: strength and stability. One might assume that coalition provides more of both than minority government. Indeed, for that reason, it is rare for central or devolved governments in the United Kingdom to operate as minorities through choice. Yet, the Scottish experience shows that the differences between coalition and minority government are not completely straightforward. Much depends on the institutional context and, in many cases, idiosyncratic elements of particular systems. Consequently, one can identify a trade-off in comparative analysis: as the identification of elements specific to one system increases, the ability to draw clear meaningful lessons decreases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-269
Number of pages9
JournalPolitical Quarterly
Volume82
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

coalition
minority
election result
experience
parliament
ability

Keywords

  • coalition
  • minority
  • Scotland
  • devolution
  • UK

Cite this

Coalition and Minority Government in Scotland : Lessons for the United Kingdom. / Cairney, Paul Alexander.

In: Political Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2011, p. 261-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cairney, Paul Alexander. / Coalition and Minority Government in Scotland : Lessons for the United Kingdom. In: Political Quarterly. 2011 ; Vol. 82, No. 2. pp. 261-269.
@article{56feaeb0c5614aa196a04a7f9c1bc8a6,
title = "Coalition and Minority Government in Scotland: Lessons for the United Kingdom",
abstract = "The United Kingdom general election result in 2010 produced a hung or balanced parliament for the first time in over three decades. Since the United Kingdom has limited postwar experience of this outcome, it is natural that commentators have begun to look elsewhere for lessons on the practicalities of minority and coalition government. This article considers the lessons we can learn from the Scottish parliamentary experience since 1999. It outlines two main points of comparison: strength and stability. One might assume that coalition provides more of both than minority government. Indeed, for that reason, it is rare for central or devolved governments in the United Kingdom to operate as minorities through choice. Yet, the Scottish experience shows that the differences between coalition and minority government are not completely straightforward. Much depends on the institutional context and, in many cases, idiosyncratic elements of particular systems. Consequently, one can identify a trade-off in comparative analysis: as the identification of elements specific to one system increases, the ability to draw clear meaningful lessons decreases.",
keywords = "coalition , minority , Scotland , devolution , UK",
author = "Cairney, {Paul Alexander}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02184.x",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "261--269",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coalition and Minority Government in Scotland

T2 - Lessons for the United Kingdom

AU - Cairney, Paul Alexander

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The United Kingdom general election result in 2010 produced a hung or balanced parliament for the first time in over three decades. Since the United Kingdom has limited postwar experience of this outcome, it is natural that commentators have begun to look elsewhere for lessons on the practicalities of minority and coalition government. This article considers the lessons we can learn from the Scottish parliamentary experience since 1999. It outlines two main points of comparison: strength and stability. One might assume that coalition provides more of both than minority government. Indeed, for that reason, it is rare for central or devolved governments in the United Kingdom to operate as minorities through choice. Yet, the Scottish experience shows that the differences between coalition and minority government are not completely straightforward. Much depends on the institutional context and, in many cases, idiosyncratic elements of particular systems. Consequently, one can identify a trade-off in comparative analysis: as the identification of elements specific to one system increases, the ability to draw clear meaningful lessons decreases.

AB - The United Kingdom general election result in 2010 produced a hung or balanced parliament for the first time in over three decades. Since the United Kingdom has limited postwar experience of this outcome, it is natural that commentators have begun to look elsewhere for lessons on the practicalities of minority and coalition government. This article considers the lessons we can learn from the Scottish parliamentary experience since 1999. It outlines two main points of comparison: strength and stability. One might assume that coalition provides more of both than minority government. Indeed, for that reason, it is rare for central or devolved governments in the United Kingdom to operate as minorities through choice. Yet, the Scottish experience shows that the differences between coalition and minority government are not completely straightforward. Much depends on the institutional context and, in many cases, idiosyncratic elements of particular systems. Consequently, one can identify a trade-off in comparative analysis: as the identification of elements specific to one system increases, the ability to draw clear meaningful lessons decreases.

KW - coalition

KW - minority

KW - Scotland

KW - devolution

KW - UK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02184.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02184.x

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 261

EP - 269

JO - Political Quarterly

JF - Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

IS - 2

ER -