Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management

Judith Westerink*, Roel Jongeneel, Nico Polman, Katrin Prager, Jeremy Franks, Pierre Dupraz, Evy Mettepenningen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies show that agri-environment schemes (AES) are likely to be more effective if they are designed at the landscape scale. However, this requires spatial coordination of environmental management across multiple farm holdings and collaboration among governmental and other actors, including, possibly, groups of farmers. In this study we analyse alternative approaches to spatial coordination and collaboration. Through case studies from five EU member states in North West Europe we analysed collaborative governance arrangements, from the perspective of the distribution of governance tasks among collaborating actors and changes to these over time. Of these governance tasks, spatial coordination had our particular interest. The collaborative governance arrangements were shaped in various ways. In four out of five case studies a group of farmers had become involved in the performance of more governance tasks over time. In all cases a professional(ized) organisation (governmental organisation or a group of farmers) was responsible for spatial coordination, possibly due to the complexities inherent to a landscape approach. In relation to the change of schemes over time, we argue that adaptive collaborative governance, incorporating learning, monitoring and evaluation in the governance arrangements, is key to effective agri-environmental management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-192
Number of pages17
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume69
Early online date20 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Agri-environment schemes
  • Landscape approach
  • Farmer groups
  • Cooperation
  • Adaptive governance
  • AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES
  • TRANSACTION COSTS
  • BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS
  • EUROPEAN-UNION
  • SCHEMES
  • BIODIVERSITY
  • CONSERVATION
  • POLICY
  • FARMERS
  • LAND

Cite this

Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management. / Westerink, Judith; Jongeneel, Roel; Polman, Nico; Prager, Katrin; Franks, Jeremy; Dupraz, Pierre; Mettepenningen, Evy.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 69, 12.2017, p. 176-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Westerink, Judith ; Jongeneel, Roel ; Polman, Nico ; Prager, Katrin ; Franks, Jeremy ; Dupraz, Pierre ; Mettepenningen, Evy. / Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management. In: Land Use Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 69. pp. 176-192.
@article{c5aefe5cc8de491e8b42463668875a1b,
title = "Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management",
abstract = "Several studies show that agri-environment schemes (AES) are likely to be more effective if they are designed at the landscape scale. However, this requires spatial coordination of environmental management across multiple farm holdings and collaboration among governmental and other actors, including, possibly, groups of farmers. In this study we analyse alternative approaches to spatial coordination and collaboration. Through case studies from five EU member states in North West Europe we analysed collaborative governance arrangements, from the perspective of the distribution of governance tasks among collaborating actors and changes to these over time. Of these governance tasks, spatial coordination had our particular interest. The collaborative governance arrangements were shaped in various ways. In four out of five case studies a group of farmers had become involved in the performance of more governance tasks over time. In all cases a professional(ized) organisation (governmental organisation or a group of farmers) was responsible for spatial coordination, possibly due to the complexities inherent to a landscape approach. In relation to the change of schemes over time, we argue that adaptive collaborative governance, incorporating learning, monitoring and evaluation in the governance arrangements, is key to effective agri-environmental management.",
keywords = "Agri-environment schemes, Landscape approach, Farmer groups, Cooperation, Adaptive governance, AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES, TRANSACTION COSTS, BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS, EUROPEAN-UNION, SCHEMES, BIODIVERSITY, CONSERVATION, POLICY, FARMERS, LAND",
author = "Judith Westerink and Roel Jongeneel and Nico Polman and Katrin Prager and Jeremy Franks and Pierre Dupraz and Evy Mettepenningen",
note = "The writing of this article was funded by the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs through the programme Beleidsondersteunend Onderzoek. Some of Katrin Prager's writing time was funded through the Scottish Governments Strategic Research Programme 2016-2021. We are grateful to Paul Terwan for commenting on the WLD case study, and to all the stakeholders that provided the information that formed the basis for this analysis. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve the manuscript.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "176--192",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management

AU - Westerink, Judith

AU - Jongeneel, Roel

AU - Polman, Nico

AU - Prager, Katrin

AU - Franks, Jeremy

AU - Dupraz, Pierre

AU - Mettepenningen, Evy

N1 - The writing of this article was funded by the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs through the programme Beleidsondersteunend Onderzoek. Some of Katrin Prager's writing time was funded through the Scottish Governments Strategic Research Programme 2016-2021. We are grateful to Paul Terwan for commenting on the WLD case study, and to all the stakeholders that provided the information that formed the basis for this analysis. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped to improve the manuscript.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Several studies show that agri-environment schemes (AES) are likely to be more effective if they are designed at the landscape scale. However, this requires spatial coordination of environmental management across multiple farm holdings and collaboration among governmental and other actors, including, possibly, groups of farmers. In this study we analyse alternative approaches to spatial coordination and collaboration. Through case studies from five EU member states in North West Europe we analysed collaborative governance arrangements, from the perspective of the distribution of governance tasks among collaborating actors and changes to these over time. Of these governance tasks, spatial coordination had our particular interest. The collaborative governance arrangements were shaped in various ways. In four out of five case studies a group of farmers had become involved in the performance of more governance tasks over time. In all cases a professional(ized) organisation (governmental organisation or a group of farmers) was responsible for spatial coordination, possibly due to the complexities inherent to a landscape approach. In relation to the change of schemes over time, we argue that adaptive collaborative governance, incorporating learning, monitoring and evaluation in the governance arrangements, is key to effective agri-environmental management.

AB - Several studies show that agri-environment schemes (AES) are likely to be more effective if they are designed at the landscape scale. However, this requires spatial coordination of environmental management across multiple farm holdings and collaboration among governmental and other actors, including, possibly, groups of farmers. In this study we analyse alternative approaches to spatial coordination and collaboration. Through case studies from five EU member states in North West Europe we analysed collaborative governance arrangements, from the perspective of the distribution of governance tasks among collaborating actors and changes to these over time. Of these governance tasks, spatial coordination had our particular interest. The collaborative governance arrangements were shaped in various ways. In four out of five case studies a group of farmers had become involved in the performance of more governance tasks over time. In all cases a professional(ized) organisation (governmental organisation or a group of farmers) was responsible for spatial coordination, possibly due to the complexities inherent to a landscape approach. In relation to the change of schemes over time, we argue that adaptive collaborative governance, incorporating learning, monitoring and evaluation in the governance arrangements, is key to effective agri-environmental management.

KW - Agri-environment schemes

KW - Landscape approach

KW - Farmer groups

KW - Cooperation

KW - Adaptive governance

KW - AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES

KW - TRANSACTION COSTS

KW - BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS

KW - EUROPEAN-UNION

KW - SCHEMES

KW - BIODIVERSITY

KW - CONSERVATION

KW - POLICY

KW - FARMERS

KW - LAND

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 176

EP - 192

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -