Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics

Neil James Mitchell, W. L. Hansen, J. Drope

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists' arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses-are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)421-429
    Number of pages8
    JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
    Volume57
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004

    Keywords

    • UNITED-STATES
    • DETERMINANTS
    • FIRMS
    • BUSINESS
    • PACS

    Cite this

    Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics. / Mitchell, Neil James; Hansen, W. L.; Drope, J.

    In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, 09.2004, p. 421-429.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mitchell, Neil James ; Hansen, W. L. ; Drope, J. / Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics. In: Political Research Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 57. pp. 421-429.
    @article{9c404f1e46ca4af0b31e41bd862e3efb,
    title = "Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics",
    abstract = "Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists' arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses-are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?",
    keywords = "UNITED-STATES, DETERMINANTS, FIRMS, BUSINESS, PACS",
    author = "Mitchell, {Neil James} and Hansen, {W. L.} and J. Drope",
    year = "2004",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.2307/3219852",
    language = "English",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "421--429",
    journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
    issn = "1065-9129",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics

    AU - Mitchell, Neil James

    AU - Hansen, W. L.

    AU - Drope, J.

    PY - 2004/9

    Y1 - 2004/9

    N2 - Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists' arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses-are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?

    AB - Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists' arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses-are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?

    KW - UNITED-STATES

    KW - DETERMINANTS

    KW - FIRMS

    KW - BUSINESS

    KW - PACS

    U2 - 10.2307/3219852

    DO - 10.2307/3219852

    M3 - Article

    VL - 57

    SP - 421

    EP - 429

    JO - Political Research Quarterly

    JF - Political Research Quarterly

    SN - 1065-9129

    ER -