Colonial apologies and the problem of the transgressor speaking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Can state apologies help reconciliation between former coloniser and colonised? Much of the literature on political apologies is optimistic regarding their potential to aid reconciliation. Even critical work frequently dispraises particular case studies, while maintaining a normative commitment to apology. Building on a growing postcolonial literature on the subject, this article contributes a more fundamental critique of colonial apology. It argues that its inherent structure entails a format that accords the politician of the transgressor state an elevated speaking position. This results in the ritual being predisposed to problematic representations of the colonised and sanitised narratives of the transgression. The argument is situated within Edward Said’s considerations on representation in the colonial process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-417
Number of pages19
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume39
Issue number3
Early online date29 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

reconciliation
transgression
speaking
politician
religious behavior
commitment
narrative
literature

Keywords

  • political apologies
  • voice
  • colonialism
  • Comfort Women
  • narrative

Cite this

Colonial apologies and the problem of the transgressor speaking. / Bentley, Tom.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2018, p. 399-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88bb250287dc484cb973ccb2ae4e7b3d,
title = "Colonial apologies and the problem of the transgressor speaking",
abstract = "Can state apologies help reconciliation between former coloniser and colonised? Much of the literature on political apologies is optimistic regarding their potential to aid reconciliation. Even critical work frequently dispraises particular case studies, while maintaining a normative commitment to apology. Building on a growing postcolonial literature on the subject, this article contributes a more fundamental critique of colonial apology. It argues that its inherent structure entails a format that accords the politician of the transgressor state an elevated speaking position. This results in the ritual being predisposed to problematic representations of the colonised and sanitised narratives of the transgression. The argument is situated within Edward Said’s considerations on representation in the colonial process.",
keywords = "political apologies, voice, colonialism, Comfort Women, narrative",
author = "Tom Bentley",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2017.1401922",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "399--417",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonial apologies and the problem of the transgressor speaking

AU - Bentley, Tom

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Can state apologies help reconciliation between former coloniser and colonised? Much of the literature on political apologies is optimistic regarding their potential to aid reconciliation. Even critical work frequently dispraises particular case studies, while maintaining a normative commitment to apology. Building on a growing postcolonial literature on the subject, this article contributes a more fundamental critique of colonial apology. It argues that its inherent structure entails a format that accords the politician of the transgressor state an elevated speaking position. This results in the ritual being predisposed to problematic representations of the colonised and sanitised narratives of the transgression. The argument is situated within Edward Said’s considerations on representation in the colonial process.

AB - Can state apologies help reconciliation between former coloniser and colonised? Much of the literature on political apologies is optimistic regarding their potential to aid reconciliation. Even critical work frequently dispraises particular case studies, while maintaining a normative commitment to apology. Building on a growing postcolonial literature on the subject, this article contributes a more fundamental critique of colonial apology. It argues that its inherent structure entails a format that accords the politician of the transgressor state an elevated speaking position. This results in the ritual being predisposed to problematic representations of the colonised and sanitised narratives of the transgression. The argument is situated within Edward Said’s considerations on representation in the colonial process.

KW - political apologies

KW - voice

KW - colonialism

KW - Comfort Women

KW - narrative

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2017.1401922

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2017.1401922

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 399

EP - 417

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 3

ER -