Commonalities and Differences between Scholarly and Technical Collaboration: an Exploration of Co-invention and Co-authorship Analyses

Martin S. Meyer, Sujit Bhattacharya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Co-authorship analysis is a well-established tool in bibliometric analysis. It can be used at various levels to trace collaborative links between individuals, organisations, or countries. Increasingly, informetric methods are applied to patent data. It has been shown for another method that bibliometric tools cannot be applied without difficulty. This is due to the different process in which a patent is filed, examined, and granted and a scientific paper is submitted, refereed and published. However, in spite of the differences, there are also parallels between scholarly papers and patents. For instance, both papers and patents are the result of an intellectual effort, both disclose relevant information, and both are subject to a process of examination. Given the similarities, we shall raise the question as to which extent one can transfer co-authorship analysis to patent data.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-456
Number of pages14
JournalScientometrics
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Commonalities and Differences between Scholarly and Technical Collaboration: an Exploration of Co-invention and Co-authorship Analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this