Communication and communion

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Shanker & King's (S&K's) dynamic systems approach converges with developments in social anthropological studies of communication which were long ago anticipated in the writings of Volosinov and Schutz. Following a review of these writings, this commentary suggests that a dynamic systems approach should distinguish communion from communication. It concludes with a remark on the evolutionary implications of the approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume25
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Cite this

Communication and communion. / Ingold, T .

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 25, 2002, p. 627.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{006f08869b724acfb41089e570120f6d,
title = "Communication and communion",
abstract = "Shanker & King's (S&K's) dynamic systems approach converges with developments in social anthropological studies of communication which were long ago anticipated in the writings of Volosinov and Schutz. Following a review of these writings, this commentary suggests that a dynamic systems approach should distinguish communion from communication. It concludes with a remark on the evolutionary implications of the approach.",
author = "T Ingold",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "627",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication and communion

AU - Ingold, T

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Shanker & King's (S&K's) dynamic systems approach converges with developments in social anthropological studies of communication which were long ago anticipated in the writings of Volosinov and Schutz. Following a review of these writings, this commentary suggests that a dynamic systems approach should distinguish communion from communication. It concludes with a remark on the evolutionary implications of the approach.

AB - Shanker & King's (S&K's) dynamic systems approach converges with developments in social anthropological studies of communication which were long ago anticipated in the writings of Volosinov and Schutz. Following a review of these writings, this commentary suggests that a dynamic systems approach should distinguish communion from communication. It concludes with a remark on the evolutionary implications of the approach.

M3 - Editorial

VL - 25

SP - 627

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -