Communication of behaviour change interventions: can they be recognised from written descriptions?

Marie Johnston, Derek Johnston, Caroline E Wood, Wendy Hardeman, Jill Francis, Susan Michie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Communication of the content of a behaviour change intervention (BCI) involves clear description followed by appropriate recognition and interpretation. We investigated accuracy of recognition of BCI descriptions and the effects of training in the behaviour change taxonomy BCTTv1.
Methods: Materials were 166 written descriptions of two BCIs previously written by 166 separate writers after viewing a video of the BCI. Each of the current participants (12 naïve and 12 trained in BCTTv1) was presented with a random sample of the written descriptions and asked to form groups of descriptions they judged to be describing the same intervention. For each participant, we assessed the number of groupings of BCI descriptions, their purity (containing only one BCI) and their differentiation (having a dominant BCI).
Results: All except one participant classified the descriptions into more than two groupings. Naïve participants created significantly more groupings, fewer ‘pure’ groupings and less differentiated groupings (all Mann-Whitney p<.05).
Conclusions: Written communications of BCI contents may not be recognised and interpreted adequately to support implementation. BCT taxonomy training may lead to some progress in interpreting the active content of interventions but, based on this limited study, further progress is needed if BCIs for accurate implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-723
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology & Health
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date11 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • behaviour change interventions
  • behaviour change techniques
  • BCTTv1
  • implementation
  • communication

Cite this

Communication of behaviour change interventions : can they be recognised from written descriptions? / Johnston, Marie; Johnston, Derek; Wood, Caroline E; Hardeman, Wendy; Francis, Jill; Michie, Susan.

In: Psychology & Health, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2018, p. 713-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, Marie ; Johnston, Derek ; Wood, Caroline E ; Hardeman, Wendy ; Francis, Jill ; Michie, Susan. / Communication of behaviour change interventions : can they be recognised from written descriptions?. In: Psychology & Health. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 713-723.
@article{6681074aa6104ada98b581349075de70,
title = "Communication of behaviour change interventions: can they be recognised from written descriptions?",
abstract = "Objective: Communication of the content of a behaviour change intervention (BCI) involves clear description followed by appropriate recognition and interpretation. We investigated accuracy of recognition of BCI descriptions and the effects of training in the behaviour change taxonomy BCTTv1.Methods: Materials were 166 written descriptions of two BCIs previously written by 166 separate writers after viewing a video of the BCI. Each of the current participants (12 na{\"i}ve and 12 trained in BCTTv1) was presented with a random sample of the written descriptions and asked to form groups of descriptions they judged to be describing the same intervention. For each participant, we assessed the number of groupings of BCI descriptions, their purity (containing only one BCI) and their differentiation (having a dominant BCI).Results: All except one participant classified the descriptions into more than two groupings. Na{\"i}ve participants created significantly more groupings, fewer ‘pure’ groupings and less differentiated groupings (all Mann-Whitney p<.05).Conclusions: Written communications of BCI contents may not be recognised and interpreted adequately to support implementation. BCT taxonomy training may lead to some progress in interpreting the active content of interventions but, based on this limited study, further progress is needed if BCIs for accurate implementation.",
keywords = "behaviour change interventions, behaviour change techniques, BCTTv1, implementation, communication",
author = "Marie Johnston and Derek Johnston and Wood, {Caroline E} and Wendy Hardeman and Jill Francis and Susan Michie",
note = "Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the MRC via its Methodology Panel: ‘Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions’ under grant number G0901474/1.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2017.1385784",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "713--723",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication of behaviour change interventions

T2 - can they be recognised from written descriptions?

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Johnston, Derek

AU - Wood, Caroline E

AU - Hardeman, Wendy

AU - Francis, Jill

AU - Michie, Susan

N1 - Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the MRC via its Methodology Panel: ‘Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions’ under grant number G0901474/1.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Objective: Communication of the content of a behaviour change intervention (BCI) involves clear description followed by appropriate recognition and interpretation. We investigated accuracy of recognition of BCI descriptions and the effects of training in the behaviour change taxonomy BCTTv1.Methods: Materials were 166 written descriptions of two BCIs previously written by 166 separate writers after viewing a video of the BCI. Each of the current participants (12 naïve and 12 trained in BCTTv1) was presented with a random sample of the written descriptions and asked to form groups of descriptions they judged to be describing the same intervention. For each participant, we assessed the number of groupings of BCI descriptions, their purity (containing only one BCI) and their differentiation (having a dominant BCI).Results: All except one participant classified the descriptions into more than two groupings. Naïve participants created significantly more groupings, fewer ‘pure’ groupings and less differentiated groupings (all Mann-Whitney p<.05).Conclusions: Written communications of BCI contents may not be recognised and interpreted adequately to support implementation. BCT taxonomy training may lead to some progress in interpreting the active content of interventions but, based on this limited study, further progress is needed if BCIs for accurate implementation.

AB - Objective: Communication of the content of a behaviour change intervention (BCI) involves clear description followed by appropriate recognition and interpretation. We investigated accuracy of recognition of BCI descriptions and the effects of training in the behaviour change taxonomy BCTTv1.Methods: Materials were 166 written descriptions of two BCIs previously written by 166 separate writers after viewing a video of the BCI. Each of the current participants (12 naïve and 12 trained in BCTTv1) was presented with a random sample of the written descriptions and asked to form groups of descriptions they judged to be describing the same intervention. For each participant, we assessed the number of groupings of BCI descriptions, their purity (containing only one BCI) and their differentiation (having a dominant BCI).Results: All except one participant classified the descriptions into more than two groupings. Naïve participants created significantly more groupings, fewer ‘pure’ groupings and less differentiated groupings (all Mann-Whitney p<.05).Conclusions: Written communications of BCI contents may not be recognised and interpreted adequately to support implementation. BCT taxonomy training may lead to some progress in interpreting the active content of interventions but, based on this limited study, further progress is needed if BCIs for accurate implementation.

KW - behaviour change interventions

KW - behaviour change techniques

KW - BCTTv1

KW - implementation

KW - communication

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2017.1385784

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2017.1385784

M3 - Article

C2 - 29019425

VL - 33

SP - 713

EP - 723

JO - Psychology & Health

JF - Psychology & Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 6

ER -