Communist ideas and Scots property law

Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ownership is nine-tenths of property law, or so the saying does not go. For the (unscientifically verified) one-tenth of property law disputes where ownership is not the decisive factor, something else must come into play. This brings an actual turn of phrase to mind, also entirely unscientific, namely that possession is nine-tenths of the law. How Scots law deals with cases where the owner plays but a background role is demonstrated in the case of Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University and Another [2015] SC GLA 75. That recent Sheriff Court case, about what to do with a collection of corporeal moveables in a contest between personalities with claims short of ownership, forms the subject of this note.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScots Law Times
Volume34
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Law
possession
personality

Cite this

Communist ideas and Scots property law : Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University. / Combe, Malcolm M.

In: Scots Law Times, Vol. 34, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e3b8a34e9054925a0855e4ae59d108b,
title = "Communist ideas and Scots property law: Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University",
abstract = "Ownership is nine-tenths of property law, or so the saying does not go. For the (unscientifically verified) one-tenth of property law disputes where ownership is not the decisive factor, something else must come into play. This brings an actual turn of phrase to mind, also entirely unscientific, namely that possession is nine-tenths of the law. How Scots law deals with cases where the owner plays but a background role is demonstrated in the case of Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University and Another [2015] SC GLA 75. That recent Sheriff Court case, about what to do with a collection of corporeal moveables in a contest between personalities with claims short of ownership, forms the subject of this note.",
author = "Combe, {Malcolm M.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
journal = "Scots Law Times",
issn = "0036-908X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communist ideas and Scots property law

T2 - Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University

AU - Combe, Malcolm M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Ownership is nine-tenths of property law, or so the saying does not go. For the (unscientifically verified) one-tenth of property law disputes where ownership is not the decisive factor, something else must come into play. This brings an actual turn of phrase to mind, also entirely unscientific, namely that possession is nine-tenths of the law. How Scots law deals with cases where the owner plays but a background role is demonstrated in the case of Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University and Another [2015] SC GLA 75. That recent Sheriff Court case, about what to do with a collection of corporeal moveables in a contest between personalities with claims short of ownership, forms the subject of this note.

AB - Ownership is nine-tenths of property law, or so the saying does not go. For the (unscientifically verified) one-tenth of property law disputes where ownership is not the decisive factor, something else must come into play. This brings an actual turn of phrase to mind, also entirely unscientific, namely that possession is nine-tenths of the law. How Scots law deals with cases where the owner plays but a background role is demonstrated in the case of Canning v Glasgow Caledonian University and Another [2015] SC GLA 75. That recent Sheriff Court case, about what to do with a collection of corporeal moveables in a contest between personalities with claims short of ownership, forms the subject of this note.

M3 - Article

VL - 34

JO - Scots Law Times

JF - Scots Law Times

SN - 0036-908X

ER -