Comparing Market-Based Renewable Energy Regimes: The Cases of the UK and Japan

Dave Toke, Kenichi Oshima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparison is made of the operation and outcome of “market based” renewable energy support mechanisms operating in Japan and the United Kingdom. Although the results of this comparison suggest that both designs have deficiencies compared to “feed-in” tariff support mechanisms, there are clear differences between the two market-based regimes. The British design, which is based on automatic penalties for non-compliance by electricity suppliers and on reasonably ambitious targets for expansion of new renewable energy, is producing some significant volume growth in renewables. Projections suggest that this will continue. However, the same cannot be said of the Japanese scheme, where penalties for non-compliance have not been applied and where the targets for expansion are low.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-425
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Green Energy
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Electricity

Keywords

  • market based regimes
  • penalties
  • cost-effectiveness
  • volume growth

Cite this

Comparing Market-Based Renewable Energy Regimes : The Cases of the UK and Japan. / Toke, Dave; Oshima, Kenichi .

In: International Journal of Green Energy, Vol. 4, No. 4, 08.2007, p. 409-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{76aecb54763b41f4a8f85959c3d92ef1,
title = "Comparing Market-Based Renewable Energy Regimes: The Cases of the UK and Japan",
abstract = "A comparison is made of the operation and outcome of “market based” renewable energy support mechanisms operating in Japan and the United Kingdom. Although the results of this comparison suggest that both designs have deficiencies compared to “feed-in” tariff support mechanisms, there are clear differences between the two market-based regimes. The British design, which is based on automatic penalties for non-compliance by electricity suppliers and on reasonably ambitious targets for expansion of new renewable energy, is producing some significant volume growth in renewables. Projections suggest that this will continue. However, the same cannot be said of the Japanese scheme, where penalties for non-compliance have not been applied and where the targets for expansion are low.",
keywords = "market based regimes, penalties, cost-effectiveness, volume growth",
author = "Dave Toke and Kenichi Oshima",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/15435070701465748",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "409--425",
journal = "International Journal of Green Energy",
issn = "1543-5075",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Market-Based Renewable Energy Regimes

T2 - The Cases of the UK and Japan

AU - Toke, Dave

AU - Oshima, Kenichi

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - A comparison is made of the operation and outcome of “market based” renewable energy support mechanisms operating in Japan and the United Kingdom. Although the results of this comparison suggest that both designs have deficiencies compared to “feed-in” tariff support mechanisms, there are clear differences between the two market-based regimes. The British design, which is based on automatic penalties for non-compliance by electricity suppliers and on reasonably ambitious targets for expansion of new renewable energy, is producing some significant volume growth in renewables. Projections suggest that this will continue. However, the same cannot be said of the Japanese scheme, where penalties for non-compliance have not been applied and where the targets for expansion are low.

AB - A comparison is made of the operation and outcome of “market based” renewable energy support mechanisms operating in Japan and the United Kingdom. Although the results of this comparison suggest that both designs have deficiencies compared to “feed-in” tariff support mechanisms, there are clear differences between the two market-based regimes. The British design, which is based on automatic penalties for non-compliance by electricity suppliers and on reasonably ambitious targets for expansion of new renewable energy, is producing some significant volume growth in renewables. Projections suggest that this will continue. However, the same cannot be said of the Japanese scheme, where penalties for non-compliance have not been applied and where the targets for expansion are low.

KW - market based regimes

KW - penalties

KW - cost-effectiveness

KW - volume growth

U2 - 10.1080/15435070701465748

DO - 10.1080/15435070701465748

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 409

EP - 425

JO - International Journal of Green Energy

JF - International Journal of Green Energy

SN - 1543-5075

IS - 4

ER -