Comparison of carbon footprint and net ecosystem carbon budget under organic material retention combined with reduced mineral fertilizer

Ying Liu*, Haiying Tang, Pete Smith, Chuan Zhong, Guoqin Huang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Excessive application of chemical fertilizer has resulted in lower nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of crops, decreasing soil fertility, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, and worse environmental pollution. Organic material retention is regard as the key to solve these problems. The objective of this study is to conduct an assessment of carbon budget under Astragalus sinicus L. and rice straw retention combined with reduced mineral fertilizer based on the 2-year field experiment in a paddy field in the south of China. The experiment was randomized complete block design including four treatments with triplicates: control CK (winter follow, 120 kg ha−1 N fertilizer for each rice season) and three treatments with Astragalus sinicus L. and rice straw retention named RA, RB, and RC (reduced N fertilizer by 15%, 27.5%, and 40% in each rice season). Results: Treatments RA, RB, and RC increased greenhouse gas emissions by 9.30–101.25%, among which CH4 accounted for more than 60%; Carbon input of crops from treatments RA, RB, and RC increased by 2.25–12.10% compared with control CK over the 2 years. Though treatments RA, RB, and RC enhanced CO2 emissions, treatment RB decreased carbon footprint and became carbon sink. Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that treatment RB (Astragalus sinicus L. and rice straw retention with reduced N fertilizer by 27.5%) is better in reducing chemical fertilizer amount, increasing crop yield and carbon input, which is more conductive to sustainable development of agriculture.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Number of pages9
JournalCarbon Balance and Management
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Yang Wenting, Yang Binjuan and Zhou Quan for their help in our research.

Funding
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant number: 41661070, the National Key R&D Program, Grant numbers: 2016YFD0300208, and Jiangxi Provincial 2019 Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project (YC-2019-B060).

Keywords

  • Astragalus sinicus L
  • Carbon footprint
  • Greenhouse gas emissions
  • Net ecosystem carbon budget
  • Reduced mineral fertilizer
  • Rice straw

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of carbon footprint and net ecosystem carbon budget under organic material retention combined with reduced mineral fertilizer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this