Comparison of consultation rates in primary care attenders with and without seasonal affective disorder

J. E. Andrew, Samantha Mary Wileman, F. L. Howie, Isobel Mary Cameron, Simon Alexander Naji, John Eagles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of published information about the consultation patterns of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in primary care, when compared with non-seasonal controls (NSCs). Methods: Interview-confirmed SAD cases (n = 90) were age- and sex-matched to two controls without significant seasonal morbidity on the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) (non-seasonal controls, NSCs). A comparison of their consultation rates was made using data abstracted from primary care records over 4 years. Results: The monthly rate of general practice consultations for SAD cases was significantly higher than that for NSCs. There was a significant difference in the median number of consultations in winter and autumn between the two groups. The matched multivariate analysis revealed that February and April were the independent months in which cases of SAD had significantly more consultations than NSCs. Limitations: Optimal diagnostic criteria for SAD have not been determined and our criteria may have been over-inclusive. Conclusion: In addition to a marked difference in monthly consultation rates between SAD cases and NSCs, the data demonstrate a difference in the pattern of seasonality of these rates. It is possible that increased frequency of consultation, in particular during the winter months (in patients who scare as a case SPAQ), could be used as an indication of SAD in primary care. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • seasonality
  • seasonal affective disorder
  • consultations
  • primary care
  • PREVALENCE
  • DEPRESSION
  • COMMUNITY
  • BIPOLAR
  • HEALTH
  • SAMPLE
  • MOOD

Cite this

Comparison of consultation rates in primary care attenders with and without seasonal affective disorder. / Andrew, J. E.; Wileman, Samantha Mary; Howie, F. L.; Cameron, Isobel Mary; Naji, Simon Alexander; Eagles, John.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2001, p. 199-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{990a4795013a4bed87db8f2449e5e9a2,
title = "Comparison of consultation rates in primary care attenders with and without seasonal affective disorder",
abstract = "Background: There is a lack of published information about the consultation patterns of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in primary care, when compared with non-seasonal controls (NSCs). Methods: Interview-confirmed SAD cases (n = 90) were age- and sex-matched to two controls without significant seasonal morbidity on the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) (non-seasonal controls, NSCs). A comparison of their consultation rates was made using data abstracted from primary care records over 4 years. Results: The monthly rate of general practice consultations for SAD cases was significantly higher than that for NSCs. There was a significant difference in the median number of consultations in winter and autumn between the two groups. The matched multivariate analysis revealed that February and April were the independent months in which cases of SAD had significantly more consultations than NSCs. Limitations: Optimal diagnostic criteria for SAD have not been determined and our criteria may have been over-inclusive. Conclusion: In addition to a marked difference in monthly consultation rates between SAD cases and NSCs, the data demonstrate a difference in the pattern of seasonality of these rates. It is possible that increased frequency of consultation, in particular during the winter months (in patients who scare as a case SPAQ), could be used as an indication of SAD in primary care. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "seasonality, seasonal affective disorder, consultations, primary care, PREVALENCE, DEPRESSION, COMMUNITY, BIPOLAR, HEALTH, SAMPLE, MOOD",
author = "Andrew, {J. E.} and Wileman, {Samantha Mary} and Howie, {F. L.} and Cameron, {Isobel Mary} and Naji, {Simon Alexander} and John Eagles",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00148-8",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "199--205",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of consultation rates in primary care attenders with and without seasonal affective disorder

AU - Andrew, J. E.

AU - Wileman, Samantha Mary

AU - Howie, F. L.

AU - Cameron, Isobel Mary

AU - Naji, Simon Alexander

AU - Eagles, John

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background: There is a lack of published information about the consultation patterns of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in primary care, when compared with non-seasonal controls (NSCs). Methods: Interview-confirmed SAD cases (n = 90) were age- and sex-matched to two controls without significant seasonal morbidity on the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) (non-seasonal controls, NSCs). A comparison of their consultation rates was made using data abstracted from primary care records over 4 years. Results: The monthly rate of general practice consultations for SAD cases was significantly higher than that for NSCs. There was a significant difference in the median number of consultations in winter and autumn between the two groups. The matched multivariate analysis revealed that February and April were the independent months in which cases of SAD had significantly more consultations than NSCs. Limitations: Optimal diagnostic criteria for SAD have not been determined and our criteria may have been over-inclusive. Conclusion: In addition to a marked difference in monthly consultation rates between SAD cases and NSCs, the data demonstrate a difference in the pattern of seasonality of these rates. It is possible that increased frequency of consultation, in particular during the winter months (in patients who scare as a case SPAQ), could be used as an indication of SAD in primary care. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Background: There is a lack of published information about the consultation patterns of patients with seasonal affective disorder (SAD) in primary care, when compared with non-seasonal controls (NSCs). Methods: Interview-confirmed SAD cases (n = 90) were age- and sex-matched to two controls without significant seasonal morbidity on the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) (non-seasonal controls, NSCs). A comparison of their consultation rates was made using data abstracted from primary care records over 4 years. Results: The monthly rate of general practice consultations for SAD cases was significantly higher than that for NSCs. There was a significant difference in the median number of consultations in winter and autumn between the two groups. The matched multivariate analysis revealed that February and April were the independent months in which cases of SAD had significantly more consultations than NSCs. Limitations: Optimal diagnostic criteria for SAD have not been determined and our criteria may have been over-inclusive. Conclusion: In addition to a marked difference in monthly consultation rates between SAD cases and NSCs, the data demonstrate a difference in the pattern of seasonality of these rates. It is possible that increased frequency of consultation, in particular during the winter months (in patients who scare as a case SPAQ), could be used as an indication of SAD in primary care. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - seasonality

KW - seasonal affective disorder

KW - consultations

KW - primary care

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - DEPRESSION

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - BIPOLAR

KW - HEALTH

KW - SAMPLE

KW - MOOD

U2 - 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00148-8

DO - 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00148-8

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 199

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

IS - 3

ER -