Comparison of different microbial bioassays to assess metal-contaminated soils

Susan Tandy, Vera Barbosa, Andy Tye, Sara Preston, Graeme Iain Paton, Hao Zhang, Steve McGrath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

These experiments compared the sensitivity of four different types of bioassay over time after five metals were added to a wide range of soils at the maximum concentrations in the European Union Sewage Sludge Directive. Three were chronic assays (most probable number of Rhizobium leguminosarum, soil microbial C and Biolog substrate utilization). The fourth bioassay, an acute biosensor, employed a lux-marked luminescent bacterium (Escherichia coli) in the soil pore water. Five metals were added to 23 different soils as a mixture at, Zn = 300, Cd = 3, Ph = 300, Cu = 135, and Ni = 75 mg/kg as nitrate salts and compared with unamended controls. Zinc and Cu were the metals most likely to be toxic at the concentrations used here. In the case of Rhizobium, the number of cells in soil was not affected after 11 d; however, by 818 d the numbers had decreased by four orders of magnitude with increasing concentrations of Zn and Cu in soil solution. Microbial biomass also was not affected after I I d, but significantly decreased with increased Zn (p < 0.001) and Cu (p < 0.01) in soil solution after 818 d. Toxicity to the soil microbial biomass increased with time, whereas the toxicity to the biosensor remained the same. Biolog substrate utilization profiles were not responsive to the concentrations used here.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-536
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Bioassay
Biological Assay
bioassay
Soil
Metals
Soils
metal
soil
rhizobacterium
Biosensing Techniques
Sewage
Biosensors
Biomass
Toxicity
toxicity
substrate
Rhizobium leguminosarum
biomass
Rhizobium
contaminated soil

Keywords

  • ecotoxicity
  • indicators
  • monitoring
  • risk
  • hazard assessment
  • substrate utilization patterns
  • leguminosarum biovar trifoli
  • sewage sludge
  • heavy metals
  • pore water
  • biomass C
  • communities
  • rhizobium
  • Zn
  • toxicity

Cite this

Comparison of different microbial bioassays to assess metal-contaminated soils. / Tandy, Susan; Barbosa, Vera; Tye, Andy; Preston, Sara; Paton, Graeme Iain; Zhang, Hao; McGrath, Steve.

In: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 24, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 530-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tandy, Susan ; Barbosa, Vera ; Tye, Andy ; Preston, Sara ; Paton, Graeme Iain ; Zhang, Hao ; McGrath, Steve. / Comparison of different microbial bioassays to assess metal-contaminated soils. In: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2005 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 530-536.
@article{15036041161f4e44b7efe3f1de12d753,
title = "Comparison of different microbial bioassays to assess metal-contaminated soils",
abstract = "These experiments compared the sensitivity of four different types of bioassay over time after five metals were added to a wide range of soils at the maximum concentrations in the European Union Sewage Sludge Directive. Three were chronic assays (most probable number of Rhizobium leguminosarum, soil microbial C and Biolog substrate utilization). The fourth bioassay, an acute biosensor, employed a lux-marked luminescent bacterium (Escherichia coli) in the soil pore water. Five metals were added to 23 different soils as a mixture at, Zn = 300, Cd = 3, Ph = 300, Cu = 135, and Ni = 75 mg/kg as nitrate salts and compared with unamended controls. Zinc and Cu were the metals most likely to be toxic at the concentrations used here. In the case of Rhizobium, the number of cells in soil was not affected after 11 d; however, by 818 d the numbers had decreased by four orders of magnitude with increasing concentrations of Zn and Cu in soil solution. Microbial biomass also was not affected after I I d, but significantly decreased with increased Zn (p < 0.001) and Cu (p < 0.01) in soil solution after 818 d. Toxicity to the soil microbial biomass increased with time, whereas the toxicity to the biosensor remained the same. Biolog substrate utilization profiles were not responsive to the concentrations used here.",
keywords = "ecotoxicity, indicators, monitoring, risk, hazard assessment, substrate utilization patterns, leguminosarum biovar trifoli, sewage sludge, heavy metals, pore water, biomass C, communities, rhizobium, Zn, toxicity",
author = "Susan Tandy and Vera Barbosa and Andy Tye and Sara Preston and Paton, {Graeme Iain} and Hao Zhang and Steve McGrath",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1897/04-197R.1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "530--536",
journal = "Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry",
issn = "0730-7268",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different microbial bioassays to assess metal-contaminated soils

AU - Tandy, Susan

AU - Barbosa, Vera

AU - Tye, Andy

AU - Preston, Sara

AU - Paton, Graeme Iain

AU - Zhang, Hao

AU - McGrath, Steve

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - These experiments compared the sensitivity of four different types of bioassay over time after five metals were added to a wide range of soils at the maximum concentrations in the European Union Sewage Sludge Directive. Three were chronic assays (most probable number of Rhizobium leguminosarum, soil microbial C and Biolog substrate utilization). The fourth bioassay, an acute biosensor, employed a lux-marked luminescent bacterium (Escherichia coli) in the soil pore water. Five metals were added to 23 different soils as a mixture at, Zn = 300, Cd = 3, Ph = 300, Cu = 135, and Ni = 75 mg/kg as nitrate salts and compared with unamended controls. Zinc and Cu were the metals most likely to be toxic at the concentrations used here. In the case of Rhizobium, the number of cells in soil was not affected after 11 d; however, by 818 d the numbers had decreased by four orders of magnitude with increasing concentrations of Zn and Cu in soil solution. Microbial biomass also was not affected after I I d, but significantly decreased with increased Zn (p < 0.001) and Cu (p < 0.01) in soil solution after 818 d. Toxicity to the soil microbial biomass increased with time, whereas the toxicity to the biosensor remained the same. Biolog substrate utilization profiles were not responsive to the concentrations used here.

AB - These experiments compared the sensitivity of four different types of bioassay over time after five metals were added to a wide range of soils at the maximum concentrations in the European Union Sewage Sludge Directive. Three were chronic assays (most probable number of Rhizobium leguminosarum, soil microbial C and Biolog substrate utilization). The fourth bioassay, an acute biosensor, employed a lux-marked luminescent bacterium (Escherichia coli) in the soil pore water. Five metals were added to 23 different soils as a mixture at, Zn = 300, Cd = 3, Ph = 300, Cu = 135, and Ni = 75 mg/kg as nitrate salts and compared with unamended controls. Zinc and Cu were the metals most likely to be toxic at the concentrations used here. In the case of Rhizobium, the number of cells in soil was not affected after 11 d; however, by 818 d the numbers had decreased by four orders of magnitude with increasing concentrations of Zn and Cu in soil solution. Microbial biomass also was not affected after I I d, but significantly decreased with increased Zn (p < 0.001) and Cu (p < 0.01) in soil solution after 818 d. Toxicity to the soil microbial biomass increased with time, whereas the toxicity to the biosensor remained the same. Biolog substrate utilization profiles were not responsive to the concentrations used here.

KW - ecotoxicity

KW - indicators

KW - monitoring

KW - risk

KW - hazard assessment

KW - substrate utilization patterns

KW - leguminosarum biovar trifoli

KW - sewage sludge

KW - heavy metals

KW - pore water

KW - biomass C

KW - communities

KW - rhizobium

KW - Zn

KW - toxicity

U2 - 10.1897/04-197R.1

DO - 10.1897/04-197R.1

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 530

EP - 536

JO - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

JF - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

SN - 0730-7268

IS - 3

ER -