Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats

Jenny Farmer, Robin Matthews, Pete Smith, Charlie Langan, Kristell Hergoualc'h, Louis Verchot, Jo U. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We test the applicability of two different methods for quantifying carbon (C) stocks in five tropical peat sites in Sumatra, Indonesia; two in an intact peat swamp forest, one in a logged forest and two in an oil palm plantation. Elemental analysis is used to quantify C contents and stocks in all samples, and is the standard to which the two methods are compared. The first method, loss on ignition (LoI), underestimates sample C stocks by 4.9 +/- 0.8% compared to results from the elemental analysis across all samples. Loss on ignition is applied to three full peat cores in one of the intact forest sites and one oil palm site, using the standard factor of 1.922 to convert the organic matter (OM) result into C content. Evaluation against independent data suggests that a factor of 1.878 would be more appropriate. The second method, using the equation presented in Warren et al. (2012) for quantifying C density in peat swamp forest soils, shows no significant difference between the equation and elemental analysis derived results for the intact and logged forest sites. We suggest the use of a bulk density (BD) range to further define the limits of the equation. When applied to samples from oil palm sites, there was a significant difference in the results provided by the Warren equation and elemental analysis. Evaluation against independent data suggests that, in this land use, C density (kg C m(-3)) is more accurately estimated by the equation C-d = (515.44 x BD) + 3.01 (R-2 = 0.94). We also present a variable factor for the conversion of the organic matter (OM) to C content by merging the two methods. We recommend the use of the LoI method with the improved factor for conversion of OM to C content, or where bulk density is known the Warren equation for calculating accurate C density values across intact and logged forests on Indonesian peats, and our revised equation for oil palm sites. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalGeoderma
Volume214-215
Early online date5 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Carbon content
  • Carbon density
  • Elemental analysis
  • Loss on ignition
  • Oil palm plantation
  • Peat swamp forest
  • Peatlands
  • Pools

Cite this

Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats. / Farmer, Jenny; Matthews, Robin; Smith, Pete; Langan, Charlie; Hergoualc'h, Kristell; Verchot, Louis; Smith, Jo U.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 214-215, 02.2014, p. 177-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farmer, J, Matthews, R, Smith, P, Langan, C, Hergoualc'h, K, Verchot, L & Smith, JU 2014, 'Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats' Geoderma, vol. 214-215, pp. 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.013
Farmer J, Matthews R, Smith P, Langan C, Hergoualc'h K, Verchot L et al. Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats. Geoderma. 2014 Feb;214-215:177-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.013
Farmer, Jenny ; Matthews, Robin ; Smith, Pete ; Langan, Charlie ; Hergoualc'h, Kristell ; Verchot, Louis ; Smith, Jo U. / Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats. In: Geoderma. 2014 ; Vol. 214-215. pp. 177-183.
@article{4a9b8164ecb94f33b3b175f761548c2e,
title = "Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats",
abstract = "We test the applicability of two different methods for quantifying carbon (C) stocks in five tropical peat sites in Sumatra, Indonesia; two in an intact peat swamp forest, one in a logged forest and two in an oil palm plantation. Elemental analysis is used to quantify C contents and stocks in all samples, and is the standard to which the two methods are compared. The first method, loss on ignition (LoI), underestimates sample C stocks by 4.9 +/- 0.8{\%} compared to results from the elemental analysis across all samples. Loss on ignition is applied to three full peat cores in one of the intact forest sites and one oil palm site, using the standard factor of 1.922 to convert the organic matter (OM) result into C content. Evaluation against independent data suggests that a factor of 1.878 would be more appropriate. The second method, using the equation presented in Warren et al. (2012) for quantifying C density in peat swamp forest soils, shows no significant difference between the equation and elemental analysis derived results for the intact and logged forest sites. We suggest the use of a bulk density (BD) range to further define the limits of the equation. When applied to samples from oil palm sites, there was a significant difference in the results provided by the Warren equation and elemental analysis. Evaluation against independent data suggests that, in this land use, C density (kg C m(-3)) is more accurately estimated by the equation C-d = (515.44 x BD) + 3.01 (R-2 = 0.94). We also present a variable factor for the conversion of the organic matter (OM) to C content by merging the two methods. We recommend the use of the LoI method with the improved factor for conversion of OM to C content, or where bulk density is known the Warren equation for calculating accurate C density values across intact and logged forests on Indonesian peats, and our revised equation for oil palm sites. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Carbon content, Carbon density, Elemental analysis, Loss on ignition, Oil palm plantation, Peat swamp forest, Peatlands, Pools",
author = "Jenny Farmer and Robin Matthews and Pete Smith and Charlie Langan and Kristell Hergoualc'h and Louis Verchot and Smith, {Jo U.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.013",
language = "English",
volume = "214-215",
pages = "177--183",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for quantifying soil carbon in tropical peats

AU - Farmer, Jenny

AU - Matthews, Robin

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Langan, Charlie

AU - Hergoualc'h, Kristell

AU - Verchot, Louis

AU - Smith, Jo U.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - We test the applicability of two different methods for quantifying carbon (C) stocks in five tropical peat sites in Sumatra, Indonesia; two in an intact peat swamp forest, one in a logged forest and two in an oil palm plantation. Elemental analysis is used to quantify C contents and stocks in all samples, and is the standard to which the two methods are compared. The first method, loss on ignition (LoI), underestimates sample C stocks by 4.9 +/- 0.8% compared to results from the elemental analysis across all samples. Loss on ignition is applied to three full peat cores in one of the intact forest sites and one oil palm site, using the standard factor of 1.922 to convert the organic matter (OM) result into C content. Evaluation against independent data suggests that a factor of 1.878 would be more appropriate. The second method, using the equation presented in Warren et al. (2012) for quantifying C density in peat swamp forest soils, shows no significant difference between the equation and elemental analysis derived results for the intact and logged forest sites. We suggest the use of a bulk density (BD) range to further define the limits of the equation. When applied to samples from oil palm sites, there was a significant difference in the results provided by the Warren equation and elemental analysis. Evaluation against independent data suggests that, in this land use, C density (kg C m(-3)) is more accurately estimated by the equation C-d = (515.44 x BD) + 3.01 (R-2 = 0.94). We also present a variable factor for the conversion of the organic matter (OM) to C content by merging the two methods. We recommend the use of the LoI method with the improved factor for conversion of OM to C content, or where bulk density is known the Warren equation for calculating accurate C density values across intact and logged forests on Indonesian peats, and our revised equation for oil palm sites. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - We test the applicability of two different methods for quantifying carbon (C) stocks in five tropical peat sites in Sumatra, Indonesia; two in an intact peat swamp forest, one in a logged forest and two in an oil palm plantation. Elemental analysis is used to quantify C contents and stocks in all samples, and is the standard to which the two methods are compared. The first method, loss on ignition (LoI), underestimates sample C stocks by 4.9 +/- 0.8% compared to results from the elemental analysis across all samples. Loss on ignition is applied to three full peat cores in one of the intact forest sites and one oil palm site, using the standard factor of 1.922 to convert the organic matter (OM) result into C content. Evaluation against independent data suggests that a factor of 1.878 would be more appropriate. The second method, using the equation presented in Warren et al. (2012) for quantifying C density in peat swamp forest soils, shows no significant difference between the equation and elemental analysis derived results for the intact and logged forest sites. We suggest the use of a bulk density (BD) range to further define the limits of the equation. When applied to samples from oil palm sites, there was a significant difference in the results provided by the Warren equation and elemental analysis. Evaluation against independent data suggests that, in this land use, C density (kg C m(-3)) is more accurately estimated by the equation C-d = (515.44 x BD) + 3.01 (R-2 = 0.94). We also present a variable factor for the conversion of the organic matter (OM) to C content by merging the two methods. We recommend the use of the LoI method with the improved factor for conversion of OM to C content, or where bulk density is known the Warren equation for calculating accurate C density values across intact and logged forests on Indonesian peats, and our revised equation for oil palm sites. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Carbon content

KW - Carbon density

KW - Elemental analysis

KW - Loss on ignition

KW - Oil palm plantation

KW - Peat swamp forest

KW - Peatlands

KW - Pools

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.013

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.09.013

M3 - Article

VL - 214-215

SP - 177

EP - 183

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -