Comparison of the cost of short flights in a nectarivorous and a non-nectarivorous bird

C Hambly, B Pinshow, P Wiersma, S Verhulst, S B Piertney, E J Harper, J R Speakman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although most birds are accustomed to making short flights, particularly during foraging, the flight patterns during these short periods of activity differ between species. Nectarivorous birds, in particular, often spend time hovering, while non-nectarivorous birds do not. The cost of short flights is likely therefore to differ between nectarivorous and non-nectarivorous birds because of the different energetic contributions of different flight types to the behaviour. The 13C-labelled bicarbonate technique was used to measure the energy cost of short flights in the nectarivorous Palestine sunbird Nectarinia osea (mean mass 6.17+/-0.16 g, N=8) and the non-nectarivorous starling Sturnus vulgaris (mean mass 70.11+/-1.11 g, N=9). The technique was initially calibrated in five individuals for each species at temperatures ranging from 1 to 35 degrees C, by comparing the isotope elimination rate to the metabolic rate measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry. The cost for short intermittent flight was then measured by encouraging birds to fly between two perches at either end of a narrow corridor (perch distance for sunbirds, 6 m; for starlings, 5 m), and measuring the amount of isotope eliminated during the flight. The isotope elimination rate was interpolated onto the calibration equation to predict flight cost, as a direct calibration could not be performed during flight. Mean energy expenditure during flight was 1.64+/-0.32 W in sunbirds, while in starlings the flight costs averaged 20.6+/-0.78 W. Energy cost of flight relative to basal metabolic rate was substantially greater in the starling than the sunbird. Phylogenetic analysis of different modes of flight in these and additional species suggests that differences in flight behaviour may cause these elevated costs in slow flying non-nectarivores such as starlings, compared to birds that are more prone to short intermittent flights like the sunbirds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3959-3968
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume207
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2004

Keywords

  • energy expenditure
  • flight cost
  • labelled bicarbonate technique
  • Palestine sunbird
  • Nectarinia osea
  • starling
  • Sturnus vulgaris
  • doubly-labeled water
  • energy-expenditure
  • Lichmera-indistincta
  • power requirements
  • wind-tunnel
  • energetics
  • bicarbonate
  • metabolism
  • validation
  • honeyeater

Cite this

Comparison of the cost of short flights in a nectarivorous and a non-nectarivorous bird. / Hambly, C; Pinshow, B; Wiersma, P; Verhulst, S; Piertney, S B; Harper, E J; Speakman, J R.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 207, No. 22, 15.10.2004, p. 3959-3968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4de9f0b5696542e99a0e5897a7c0af84,
title = "Comparison of the cost of short flights in a nectarivorous and a non-nectarivorous bird",
abstract = "Although most birds are accustomed to making short flights, particularly during foraging, the flight patterns during these short periods of activity differ between species. Nectarivorous birds, in particular, often spend time hovering, while non-nectarivorous birds do not. The cost of short flights is likely therefore to differ between nectarivorous and non-nectarivorous birds because of the different energetic contributions of different flight types to the behaviour. The 13C-labelled bicarbonate technique was used to measure the energy cost of short flights in the nectarivorous Palestine sunbird Nectarinia osea (mean mass 6.17+/-0.16 g, N=8) and the non-nectarivorous starling Sturnus vulgaris (mean mass 70.11+/-1.11 g, N=9). The technique was initially calibrated in five individuals for each species at temperatures ranging from 1 to 35 degrees C, by comparing the isotope elimination rate to the metabolic rate measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry. The cost for short intermittent flight was then measured by encouraging birds to fly between two perches at either end of a narrow corridor (perch distance for sunbirds, 6 m; for starlings, 5 m), and measuring the amount of isotope eliminated during the flight. The isotope elimination rate was interpolated onto the calibration equation to predict flight cost, as a direct calibration could not be performed during flight. Mean energy expenditure during flight was 1.64+/-0.32 W in sunbirds, while in starlings the flight costs averaged 20.6+/-0.78 W. Energy cost of flight relative to basal metabolic rate was substantially greater in the starling than the sunbird. Phylogenetic analysis of different modes of flight in these and additional species suggests that differences in flight behaviour may cause these elevated costs in slow flying non-nectarivores such as starlings, compared to birds that are more prone to short intermittent flights like the sunbirds.",
keywords = "energy expenditure, flight cost, labelled bicarbonate technique, Palestine sunbird, Nectarinia osea, starling, Sturnus vulgaris, doubly-labeled water, energy-expenditure, Lichmera-indistincta, power requirements, wind-tunnel, energetics, bicarbonate, metabolism, validation, honeyeater",
author = "C Hambly and B Pinshow and P Wiersma and S Verhulst and Piertney, {S B} and Harper, {E J} and Speakman, {J R}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.01233",
language = "English",
volume = "207",
pages = "3959--3968",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the cost of short flights in a nectarivorous and a non-nectarivorous bird

AU - Hambly, C

AU - Pinshow, B

AU - Wiersma, P

AU - Verhulst, S

AU - Piertney, S B

AU - Harper, E J

AU - Speakman, J R

PY - 2004/10/15

Y1 - 2004/10/15

N2 - Although most birds are accustomed to making short flights, particularly during foraging, the flight patterns during these short periods of activity differ between species. Nectarivorous birds, in particular, often spend time hovering, while non-nectarivorous birds do not. The cost of short flights is likely therefore to differ between nectarivorous and non-nectarivorous birds because of the different energetic contributions of different flight types to the behaviour. The 13C-labelled bicarbonate technique was used to measure the energy cost of short flights in the nectarivorous Palestine sunbird Nectarinia osea (mean mass 6.17+/-0.16 g, N=8) and the non-nectarivorous starling Sturnus vulgaris (mean mass 70.11+/-1.11 g, N=9). The technique was initially calibrated in five individuals for each species at temperatures ranging from 1 to 35 degrees C, by comparing the isotope elimination rate to the metabolic rate measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry. The cost for short intermittent flight was then measured by encouraging birds to fly between two perches at either end of a narrow corridor (perch distance for sunbirds, 6 m; for starlings, 5 m), and measuring the amount of isotope eliminated during the flight. The isotope elimination rate was interpolated onto the calibration equation to predict flight cost, as a direct calibration could not be performed during flight. Mean energy expenditure during flight was 1.64+/-0.32 W in sunbirds, while in starlings the flight costs averaged 20.6+/-0.78 W. Energy cost of flight relative to basal metabolic rate was substantially greater in the starling than the sunbird. Phylogenetic analysis of different modes of flight in these and additional species suggests that differences in flight behaviour may cause these elevated costs in slow flying non-nectarivores such as starlings, compared to birds that are more prone to short intermittent flights like the sunbirds.

AB - Although most birds are accustomed to making short flights, particularly during foraging, the flight patterns during these short periods of activity differ between species. Nectarivorous birds, in particular, often spend time hovering, while non-nectarivorous birds do not. The cost of short flights is likely therefore to differ between nectarivorous and non-nectarivorous birds because of the different energetic contributions of different flight types to the behaviour. The 13C-labelled bicarbonate technique was used to measure the energy cost of short flights in the nectarivorous Palestine sunbird Nectarinia osea (mean mass 6.17+/-0.16 g, N=8) and the non-nectarivorous starling Sturnus vulgaris (mean mass 70.11+/-1.11 g, N=9). The technique was initially calibrated in five individuals for each species at temperatures ranging from 1 to 35 degrees C, by comparing the isotope elimination rate to the metabolic rate measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry. The cost for short intermittent flight was then measured by encouraging birds to fly between two perches at either end of a narrow corridor (perch distance for sunbirds, 6 m; for starlings, 5 m), and measuring the amount of isotope eliminated during the flight. The isotope elimination rate was interpolated onto the calibration equation to predict flight cost, as a direct calibration could not be performed during flight. Mean energy expenditure during flight was 1.64+/-0.32 W in sunbirds, while in starlings the flight costs averaged 20.6+/-0.78 W. Energy cost of flight relative to basal metabolic rate was substantially greater in the starling than the sunbird. Phylogenetic analysis of different modes of flight in these and additional species suggests that differences in flight behaviour may cause these elevated costs in slow flying non-nectarivores such as starlings, compared to birds that are more prone to short intermittent flights like the sunbirds.

KW - energy expenditure

KW - flight cost

KW - labelled bicarbonate technique

KW - Palestine sunbird

KW - Nectarinia osea

KW - starling

KW - Sturnus vulgaris

KW - doubly-labeled water

KW - energy-expenditure

KW - Lichmera-indistincta

KW - power requirements

KW - wind-tunnel

KW - energetics

KW - bicarbonate

KW - metabolism

KW - validation

KW - honeyeater

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.01233

DO - 10.1242/jeb.01233

M3 - Article

VL - 207

SP - 3959

EP - 3968

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 22

ER -