Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments

Genevieve Ali*, Doerthe Tetzlaff, Jeffrey J. Mcdonnell, Chris Soulsby, Sean Carey, Hjalmar Laudon, Kevin Mcguire, Jim Buttle, Jan Seibert, Jamie Shanley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Nine mid-latitude to high-latitude headwater catchments - part of the Northern Watershed Ecosystem Response to Climate Change (North-Watch) programme - were used to analyze threshold response to rainfall and snowmelt-driven events and link the different responses to the catchment characteristics of the nine sites. The North-Watch data include daily time-series of various lengths of multiple variables such as air temperature, precipitation and discharge. Rainfall and meltwater inputs were differentiated using a degree-day snowmelt approach. Distinct hydrological events were identified, and precipitation-runoff response curves were visually assessed. Results showed that eight of nine catchments showed runoff initiation thresholds and effective precipitation input thresholds. For rainfall-triggered events, catchment hydroclimatic and physical characteristics (e.g. mean annual air temperature, median flow path distance to the stream, median sub-catchment area) were strong predictors of threshold strength. For snowmelt-driven events, however, thresholds and the factors controlling precipitation-runoff response were difficult to identify. The variability in catchments responses to snowmelt was not fully explained by runoff initiation thresholds and input magnitude thresholds. The quantification of input intensity thresholds (e.g. snow melting and permafrost thawing rates) is likely required for an adequate characterization of nonlinear spring runoff generation in such northern environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3575-3591
Number of pages17
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume29
Issue number16
Early online date10 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

catchment
snowmelt
runoff
ecosystem response
rainfall
air temperature
watershed
climate change
comparison
thawing
meltwater
headwater
permafrost
snow
melting
time series

Keywords

  • Dynamic storage deficit
  • North-Watch programme
  • Quickflow
  • Rainfall
  • Snowmelt
  • Thresholds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments. / Ali, Genevieve; Tetzlaff, Doerthe; Mcdonnell, Jeffrey J.; Soulsby, Chris; Carey, Sean; Laudon, Hjalmar; Mcguire, Kevin; Buttle, Jim; Seibert, Jan; Shanley, Jamie.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 29, No. 16, 30.07.2015, p. 3575-3591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ali, G, Tetzlaff, D, Mcdonnell, JJ, Soulsby, C, Carey, S, Laudon, H, Mcguire, K, Buttle, J, Seibert, J & Shanley, J 2015, 'Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments', Hydrological Processes, vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 3575-3591. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10527
Ali, Genevieve ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe ; Mcdonnell, Jeffrey J. ; Soulsby, Chris ; Carey, Sean ; Laudon, Hjalmar ; Mcguire, Kevin ; Buttle, Jim ; Seibert, Jan ; Shanley, Jamie. / Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments. In: Hydrological Processes. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 16. pp. 3575-3591.
@article{0e576813e3e344a595c78acb879f9057,
title = "Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments",
abstract = "Nine mid-latitude to high-latitude headwater catchments - part of the Northern Watershed Ecosystem Response to Climate Change (North-Watch) programme - were used to analyze threshold response to rainfall and snowmelt-driven events and link the different responses to the catchment characteristics of the nine sites. The North-Watch data include daily time-series of various lengths of multiple variables such as air temperature, precipitation and discharge. Rainfall and meltwater inputs were differentiated using a degree-day snowmelt approach. Distinct hydrological events were identified, and precipitation-runoff response curves were visually assessed. Results showed that eight of nine catchments showed runoff initiation thresholds and effective precipitation input thresholds. For rainfall-triggered events, catchment hydroclimatic and physical characteristics (e.g. mean annual air temperature, median flow path distance to the stream, median sub-catchment area) were strong predictors of threshold strength. For snowmelt-driven events, however, thresholds and the factors controlling precipitation-runoff response were difficult to identify. The variability in catchments responses to snowmelt was not fully explained by runoff initiation thresholds and input magnitude thresholds. The quantification of input intensity thresholds (e.g. snow melting and permafrost thawing rates) is likely required for an adequate characterization of nonlinear spring runoff generation in such northern environments.",
keywords = "Dynamic storage deficit, North-Watch programme, Quickflow, Rainfall, Snowmelt, Thresholds",
author = "Genevieve Ali and Doerthe Tetzlaff and Mcdonnell, {Jeffrey J.} and Chris Soulsby and Sean Carey and Hjalmar Laudon and Kevin Mcguire and Jim Buttle and Jan Seibert and Jamie Shanley",
note = "Funded by Leverhulme Trust. Grant Number: F/00 152/AG",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.10527",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "3575--3591",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of threshold hydrologic response across northern catchments

AU - Ali, Genevieve

AU - Tetzlaff, Doerthe

AU - Mcdonnell, Jeffrey J.

AU - Soulsby, Chris

AU - Carey, Sean

AU - Laudon, Hjalmar

AU - Mcguire, Kevin

AU - Buttle, Jim

AU - Seibert, Jan

AU - Shanley, Jamie

N1 - Funded by Leverhulme Trust. Grant Number: F/00 152/AG

PY - 2015/7/30

Y1 - 2015/7/30

N2 - Nine mid-latitude to high-latitude headwater catchments - part of the Northern Watershed Ecosystem Response to Climate Change (North-Watch) programme - were used to analyze threshold response to rainfall and snowmelt-driven events and link the different responses to the catchment characteristics of the nine sites. The North-Watch data include daily time-series of various lengths of multiple variables such as air temperature, precipitation and discharge. Rainfall and meltwater inputs were differentiated using a degree-day snowmelt approach. Distinct hydrological events were identified, and precipitation-runoff response curves were visually assessed. Results showed that eight of nine catchments showed runoff initiation thresholds and effective precipitation input thresholds. For rainfall-triggered events, catchment hydroclimatic and physical characteristics (e.g. mean annual air temperature, median flow path distance to the stream, median sub-catchment area) were strong predictors of threshold strength. For snowmelt-driven events, however, thresholds and the factors controlling precipitation-runoff response were difficult to identify. The variability in catchments responses to snowmelt was not fully explained by runoff initiation thresholds and input magnitude thresholds. The quantification of input intensity thresholds (e.g. snow melting and permafrost thawing rates) is likely required for an adequate characterization of nonlinear spring runoff generation in such northern environments.

AB - Nine mid-latitude to high-latitude headwater catchments - part of the Northern Watershed Ecosystem Response to Climate Change (North-Watch) programme - were used to analyze threshold response to rainfall and snowmelt-driven events and link the different responses to the catchment characteristics of the nine sites. The North-Watch data include daily time-series of various lengths of multiple variables such as air temperature, precipitation and discharge. Rainfall and meltwater inputs were differentiated using a degree-day snowmelt approach. Distinct hydrological events were identified, and precipitation-runoff response curves were visually assessed. Results showed that eight of nine catchments showed runoff initiation thresholds and effective precipitation input thresholds. For rainfall-triggered events, catchment hydroclimatic and physical characteristics (e.g. mean annual air temperature, median flow path distance to the stream, median sub-catchment area) were strong predictors of threshold strength. For snowmelt-driven events, however, thresholds and the factors controlling precipitation-runoff response were difficult to identify. The variability in catchments responses to snowmelt was not fully explained by runoff initiation thresholds and input magnitude thresholds. The quantification of input intensity thresholds (e.g. snow melting and permafrost thawing rates) is likely required for an adequate characterization of nonlinear spring runoff generation in such northern environments.

KW - Dynamic storage deficit

KW - North-Watch programme

KW - Quickflow

KW - Rainfall

KW - Snowmelt

KW - Thresholds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937637771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.10527

DO - 10.1002/hyp.10527

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937637771

VL - 29

SP - 3575

EP - 3591

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 16

ER -