Comparison of two methods of eliciting time preference for future health states

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean estimates of time preference rates for health vary widely in the literature. If these studies are to inform discounting practice and analyses of health-affecting behaviour, it is crucial to understand why this is the case. One reason for the variation in time preference rates is the use of different elicitation methods. The influence of elicitation method has received little attention in the time preference literature. This study compares directly an open-ended and a closed-ended method. Both private and social time preferences for health are elicited. The closed-ended method produced much lower mean rates than the open-ended method. This is in contrast to the contingent valuation literature which shows that closed-ended methods produce higher estimates of willingness to pay than openended methods. That the elicitation methods produce different mean estimates is clearly worrying if the interest is in estimating the true time preference rate. However, the results of this study suggest that if the interest is in testing different types of time preferences or investigating the relationship between time preference and individual characteristics then the choice of elicitation method is less important. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-889
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume67
Issue number5
Early online date18 Jun 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Keywords

  • time preference
  • stated preference methods
  • future health status

Cite this

Comparison of two methods of eliciting time preference for future health states. / Pol van der, Marjon; Cairns, J.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 67, No. 5, 09.2008, p. 883-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ede064be4ee247bfa89768358f48b4f8,
title = "Comparison of two methods of eliciting time preference for future health states",
abstract = "Mean estimates of time preference rates for health vary widely in the literature. If these studies are to inform discounting practice and analyses of health-affecting behaviour, it is crucial to understand why this is the case. One reason for the variation in time preference rates is the use of different elicitation methods. The influence of elicitation method has received little attention in the time preference literature. This study compares directly an open-ended and a closed-ended method. Both private and social time preferences for health are elicited. The closed-ended method produced much lower mean rates than the open-ended method. This is in contrast to the contingent valuation literature which shows that closed-ended methods produce higher estimates of willingness to pay than openended methods. That the elicitation methods produce different mean estimates is clearly worrying if the interest is in estimating the true time preference rate. However, the results of this study suggest that if the interest is in testing different types of time preferences or investigating the relationship between time preference and individual characteristics then the choice of elicitation method is less important. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "time preference, stated preference methods, future health status",
author = "{Pol van der}, Marjon and J. Cairns",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.011",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "883--889",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two methods of eliciting time preference for future health states

AU - Pol van der, Marjon

AU - Cairns, J.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Mean estimates of time preference rates for health vary widely in the literature. If these studies are to inform discounting practice and analyses of health-affecting behaviour, it is crucial to understand why this is the case. One reason for the variation in time preference rates is the use of different elicitation methods. The influence of elicitation method has received little attention in the time preference literature. This study compares directly an open-ended and a closed-ended method. Both private and social time preferences for health are elicited. The closed-ended method produced much lower mean rates than the open-ended method. This is in contrast to the contingent valuation literature which shows that closed-ended methods produce higher estimates of willingness to pay than openended methods. That the elicitation methods produce different mean estimates is clearly worrying if the interest is in estimating the true time preference rate. However, the results of this study suggest that if the interest is in testing different types of time preferences or investigating the relationship between time preference and individual characteristics then the choice of elicitation method is less important. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Mean estimates of time preference rates for health vary widely in the literature. If these studies are to inform discounting practice and analyses of health-affecting behaviour, it is crucial to understand why this is the case. One reason for the variation in time preference rates is the use of different elicitation methods. The influence of elicitation method has received little attention in the time preference literature. This study compares directly an open-ended and a closed-ended method. Both private and social time preferences for health are elicited. The closed-ended method produced much lower mean rates than the open-ended method. This is in contrast to the contingent valuation literature which shows that closed-ended methods produce higher estimates of willingness to pay than openended methods. That the elicitation methods produce different mean estimates is clearly worrying if the interest is in estimating the true time preference rate. However, the results of this study suggest that if the interest is in testing different types of time preferences or investigating the relationship between time preference and individual characteristics then the choice of elicitation method is less important. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - time preference

KW - stated preference methods

KW - future health status

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.011

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 883

EP - 889

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 5

ER -