Comparisons of single breath and tidal breathing exhaled nitric oxide levels in infants

P. J. Franklin, Stephen William Turner, R. Mutch, S. M. Stick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, tidal breathing (TB) and single-breath (SB), for measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in infants.

FENO was measured in 71 infants with either recurrent wheeze (n=32), recurrent cough (n=16) or no symptoms (healthy, n=23) using both methods. For TB measurements five breaths were collected into a gas sampling bag (off-line reservoir sampling). The SB method was modified from the raised volume rapid thoraco-abdominal technique. Agreement between the two methods was investigated and both methods were used to compare FENO in infants with and without symptoms.

Flow dependence of SB FENO was demonstrated using two expiratory flows (I I and 40 mL(.)s(-1)). There was a moderate correlation (r=0.60) but poor agreement between levels using the TB and SB methods. A significant difference in FENO between healthy children and children with wheeze was found using the SB but not the TB method.

Due to lower expiratory flow and reduced nasal nitric oxide contamination the single-breath technique may be more sensitive than the tidal breathing method for detecting differences in exhaled nitric oxide between infants with and without respiratory symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-372
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • exhaled nitric oxide
  • infants
  • single-breath
  • tidal breathing
  • HEALTHY-CHILDREN
  • ONLINE
  • ASTHMA
  • SEX

Cite this

Comparisons of single breath and tidal breathing exhaled nitric oxide levels in infants. / Franklin, P. J.; Turner, Stephen William; Mutch, R.; Stick, S. M.

In: European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 23, 2004, p. 369-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb00d1d896154e2f8a515208b27266af,
title = "Comparisons of single breath and tidal breathing exhaled nitric oxide levels in infants",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, tidal breathing (TB) and single-breath (SB), for measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in infants.FENO was measured in 71 infants with either recurrent wheeze (n=32), recurrent cough (n=16) or no symptoms (healthy, n=23) using both methods. For TB measurements five breaths were collected into a gas sampling bag (off-line reservoir sampling). The SB method was modified from the raised volume rapid thoraco-abdominal technique. Agreement between the two methods was investigated and both methods were used to compare FENO in infants with and without symptoms.Flow dependence of SB FENO was demonstrated using two expiratory flows (I I and 40 mL(.)s(-1)). There was a moderate correlation (r=0.60) but poor agreement between levels using the TB and SB methods. A significant difference in FENO between healthy children and children with wheeze was found using the SB but not the TB method.Due to lower expiratory flow and reduced nasal nitric oxide contamination the single-breath technique may be more sensitive than the tidal breathing method for detecting differences in exhaled nitric oxide between infants with and without respiratory symptoms.",
keywords = "exhaled nitric oxide, infants, single-breath, tidal breathing, HEALTHY-CHILDREN, ONLINE, ASTHMA, SEX",
author = "Franklin, {P. J.} and Turner, {Stephen William} and R. Mutch and Stick, {S. M.}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1183/09031936.04.00084604",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "369--372",
journal = "European Respiratory Journal",
issn = "0903-1936",
publisher = "European Respiratory Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of single breath and tidal breathing exhaled nitric oxide levels in infants

AU - Franklin, P. J.

AU - Turner, Stephen William

AU - Mutch, R.

AU - Stick, S. M.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, tidal breathing (TB) and single-breath (SB), for measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in infants.FENO was measured in 71 infants with either recurrent wheeze (n=32), recurrent cough (n=16) or no symptoms (healthy, n=23) using both methods. For TB measurements five breaths were collected into a gas sampling bag (off-line reservoir sampling). The SB method was modified from the raised volume rapid thoraco-abdominal technique. Agreement between the two methods was investigated and both methods were used to compare FENO in infants with and without symptoms.Flow dependence of SB FENO was demonstrated using two expiratory flows (I I and 40 mL(.)s(-1)). There was a moderate correlation (r=0.60) but poor agreement between levels using the TB and SB methods. A significant difference in FENO between healthy children and children with wheeze was found using the SB but not the TB method.Due to lower expiratory flow and reduced nasal nitric oxide contamination the single-breath technique may be more sensitive than the tidal breathing method for detecting differences in exhaled nitric oxide between infants with and without respiratory symptoms.

AB - The aim of this study was to compare two different methods, tidal breathing (TB) and single-breath (SB), for measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in infants.FENO was measured in 71 infants with either recurrent wheeze (n=32), recurrent cough (n=16) or no symptoms (healthy, n=23) using both methods. For TB measurements five breaths were collected into a gas sampling bag (off-line reservoir sampling). The SB method was modified from the raised volume rapid thoraco-abdominal technique. Agreement between the two methods was investigated and both methods were used to compare FENO in infants with and without symptoms.Flow dependence of SB FENO was demonstrated using two expiratory flows (I I and 40 mL(.)s(-1)). There was a moderate correlation (r=0.60) but poor agreement between levels using the TB and SB methods. A significant difference in FENO between healthy children and children with wheeze was found using the SB but not the TB method.Due to lower expiratory flow and reduced nasal nitric oxide contamination the single-breath technique may be more sensitive than the tidal breathing method for detecting differences in exhaled nitric oxide between infants with and without respiratory symptoms.

KW - exhaled nitric oxide

KW - infants

KW - single-breath

KW - tidal breathing

KW - HEALTHY-CHILDREN

KW - ONLINE

KW - ASTHMA

KW - SEX

U2 - 10.1183/09031936.04.00084604

DO - 10.1183/09031936.04.00084604

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 369

EP - 372

JO - European Respiratory Journal

JF - European Respiratory Journal

SN - 0903-1936

ER -