Competing Paradigms? The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice

Elizabeth Jane Campbell, Nessa Lynch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

DNA is an important tool for criminal investigations and prosecutions. There has been considerable comment on its collection and retention from adult suspects and convicted persons, but little analysis of the particular situation of young people in the youth justice system. This article considers the competing paradigms at play when young persons’ DNA is collected and stored. The tensions between expanded DNA powers and norms of youth justice such as reintegration and best interests are considered as well as the implications for the young person’s rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-18
Number of pages16
JournalYouth Justice
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date13 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social Justice
justice
paradigm
human being
DNA
reintegration
prosecution

Cite this

Competing Paradigms? The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice. / Campbell, Elizabeth Jane; Lynch, Nessa .

In: Youth Justice, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2012, p. 3-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campbell, Elizabeth Jane ; Lynch, Nessa . / Competing Paradigms? The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice. In: Youth Justice. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 3-18.
@article{1aa3161e7a09402796f41d7b0f96865f,
title = "Competing Paradigms?: The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice",
abstract = "DNA is an important tool for criminal investigations and prosecutions. There has been considerable comment on its collection and retention from adult suspects and convicted persons, but little analysis of the particular situation of young people in the youth justice system. This article considers the competing paradigms at play when young persons’ DNA is collected and stored. The tensions between expanded DNA powers and norms of youth justice such as reintegration and best interests are considered as well as the implications for the young person’s rights.",
author = "Campbell, {Elizabeth Jane} and Nessa Lynch",
note = "Acknowledgements Our thanks to Ursula Kilkelly for helpful comments on a previous draft. All errors remain our own. Nessa Lynch’s thanks to Kiritapu Allan, Emily Bruce and James Gilbert for research assistance.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1473225411435614",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "3--18",
journal = "Youth Justice",
issn = "1473-2254",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competing Paradigms?

T2 - The Use of DNA Powers in Youth Justice

AU - Campbell, Elizabeth Jane

AU - Lynch, Nessa

N1 - Acknowledgements Our thanks to Ursula Kilkelly for helpful comments on a previous draft. All errors remain our own. Nessa Lynch’s thanks to Kiritapu Allan, Emily Bruce and James Gilbert for research assistance.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - DNA is an important tool for criminal investigations and prosecutions. There has been considerable comment on its collection and retention from adult suspects and convicted persons, but little analysis of the particular situation of young people in the youth justice system. This article considers the competing paradigms at play when young persons’ DNA is collected and stored. The tensions between expanded DNA powers and norms of youth justice such as reintegration and best interests are considered as well as the implications for the young person’s rights.

AB - DNA is an important tool for criminal investigations and prosecutions. There has been considerable comment on its collection and retention from adult suspects and convicted persons, but little analysis of the particular situation of young people in the youth justice system. This article considers the competing paradigms at play when young persons’ DNA is collected and stored. The tensions between expanded DNA powers and norms of youth justice such as reintegration and best interests are considered as well as the implications for the young person’s rights.

U2 - 10.1177/1473225411435614

DO - 10.1177/1473225411435614

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 3

EP - 18

JO - Youth Justice

JF - Youth Justice

SN - 1473-2254

IS - 1

ER -