Conceptualising scale in regional studies and catchment science

towards an integrated characterisation of spatial units

Daniel F MacKinnon, Doerthe Tetzlaff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines conceptualisations of scale in catchment science and regional studies as the basis for the development of an integrated characterisation of spatial units. Our starting point is the apparent similarity in the scalar terminology utilised in the two fields, pointing to an area of potential conceptual overlap between physical and human geography. While our aim is not to produce an overarching theory of scale, we seek to advance understanding within both catchment science and regional studies by comparing their approaches to the analysis and understanding of spatial units. We also describe underlying principles of heterogeneity and complexity in the functioning and behaviour of catchments and regions. After clarifying scale definitions, this article examines notions of ‘scaling’ and ‘rescaling’ in each field and assesses catchments and regions as complex and open systems. In the penultimate section of this article, we develop an analytical framework based on the identification of certain dynamic attributes and concepts of integration, drawing upon the meta-theoretical language of complexity science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)976-996
Number of pages21
JournalGeography Compass
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online date26 Mar 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Catchments
science studies
catchment
geography
science
open system
scaling
technical language
physical geography
human geography
analytical framework
Open systems
Terminology
terminology
Large scale systems
language

Cite this

Conceptualising scale in regional studies and catchment science : towards an integrated characterisation of spatial units. / MacKinnon, Daniel F; Tetzlaff, Doerthe.

In: Geography Compass, Vol. 3, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 976-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e075eb0d5154431bd2f7702d2cd286c,
title = "Conceptualising scale in regional studies and catchment science: towards an integrated characterisation of spatial units",
abstract = "This article examines conceptualisations of scale in catchment science and regional studies as the basis for the development of an integrated characterisation of spatial units. Our starting point is the apparent similarity in the scalar terminology utilised in the two fields, pointing to an area of potential conceptual overlap between physical and human geography. While our aim is not to produce an overarching theory of scale, we seek to advance understanding within both catchment science and regional studies by comparing their approaches to the analysis and understanding of spatial units. We also describe underlying principles of heterogeneity and complexity in the functioning and behaviour of catchments and regions. After clarifying scale definitions, this article examines notions of ‘scaling’ and ‘rescaling’ in each field and assesses catchments and regions as complex and open systems. In the penultimate section of this article, we develop an analytical framework based on the identification of certain dynamic attributes and concepts of integration, drawing upon the meta-theoretical language of complexity science.",
author = "MacKinnon, {Daniel F} and Doerthe Tetzlaff",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00231.x",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "976--996",
journal = "Geography Compass",
issn = "1749-8198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualising scale in regional studies and catchment science

T2 - towards an integrated characterisation of spatial units

AU - MacKinnon, Daniel F

AU - Tetzlaff, Doerthe

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - This article examines conceptualisations of scale in catchment science and regional studies as the basis for the development of an integrated characterisation of spatial units. Our starting point is the apparent similarity in the scalar terminology utilised in the two fields, pointing to an area of potential conceptual overlap between physical and human geography. While our aim is not to produce an overarching theory of scale, we seek to advance understanding within both catchment science and regional studies by comparing their approaches to the analysis and understanding of spatial units. We also describe underlying principles of heterogeneity and complexity in the functioning and behaviour of catchments and regions. After clarifying scale definitions, this article examines notions of ‘scaling’ and ‘rescaling’ in each field and assesses catchments and regions as complex and open systems. In the penultimate section of this article, we develop an analytical framework based on the identification of certain dynamic attributes and concepts of integration, drawing upon the meta-theoretical language of complexity science.

AB - This article examines conceptualisations of scale in catchment science and regional studies as the basis for the development of an integrated characterisation of spatial units. Our starting point is the apparent similarity in the scalar terminology utilised in the two fields, pointing to an area of potential conceptual overlap between physical and human geography. While our aim is not to produce an overarching theory of scale, we seek to advance understanding within both catchment science and regional studies by comparing their approaches to the analysis and understanding of spatial units. We also describe underlying principles of heterogeneity and complexity in the functioning and behaviour of catchments and regions. After clarifying scale definitions, this article examines notions of ‘scaling’ and ‘rescaling’ in each field and assesses catchments and regions as complex and open systems. In the penultimate section of this article, we develop an analytical framework based on the identification of certain dynamic attributes and concepts of integration, drawing upon the meta-theoretical language of complexity science.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00231.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00231.x

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 976

EP - 996

JO - Geography Compass

JF - Geography Compass

SN - 1749-8198

IS - 3

ER -