Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice

a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff

Brian McKinstry, Philip Watson, Hilary Pinnock, David Heaney, Aziz Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. As part of a qualitative investigation into the views of patients, doctors, nurses and administrative staff on the use of telephone consulting in general practice, we set out to explore the impact of the use of this medium on perceptions of confidentiality.

Method. We used focus groups of purposively selected patients, clinicians and administrative staff in urban and rural areas.

Results. Fifteen focus groups comprising 91 individuals were convened. Participants concerns centred on overheard conversations, the receptionist role in triage, difficulty of maintaining confidentiality in small close-knit communities, errors in identification, third party conversations and answering machines. Telephone consulting, depending on the circumstances, could pose a risk or offer a solution to maintaining confidentiality.

Conclusions. Many of the concerns that patients and health care staff have around confidentiality breaches both on the telephone and face to face are amenable to careful management. Although rare, identification error or fraud can be a potentially serious problem and further thought needs to be given to the problem of misidentification on the telephone and the use of passwords considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-350
Number of pages7
JournalFamily Practice
Volume26
Issue number5
Early online date4 Jun 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Keywords

  • access
  • confidentiality
  • evaluation
  • health care quality
  • physician-patient relations
  • telephone consulting
  • same-day appointments
  • general-practice
  • primary-care
  • consultations

Cite this

Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice : a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff. / McKinstry, Brian; Watson, Philip; Pinnock, Hilary; Heaney, David; Sheikh, Aziz.

In: Family Practice, Vol. 26, No. 5, 10.2009, p. 344-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKinstry, Brian ; Watson, Philip ; Pinnock, Hilary ; Heaney, David ; Sheikh, Aziz. / Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice : a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff. In: Family Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 344-350.
@article{8e14e90b8aad411d954e65b8e49af5c3,
title = "Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice: a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff",
abstract = "Objective. As part of a qualitative investigation into the views of patients, doctors, nurses and administrative staff on the use of telephone consulting in general practice, we set out to explore the impact of the use of this medium on perceptions of confidentiality.Method. We used focus groups of purposively selected patients, clinicians and administrative staff in urban and rural areas.Results. Fifteen focus groups comprising 91 individuals were convened. Participants concerns centred on overheard conversations, the receptionist role in triage, difficulty of maintaining confidentiality in small close-knit communities, errors in identification, third party conversations and answering machines. Telephone consulting, depending on the circumstances, could pose a risk or offer a solution to maintaining confidentiality.Conclusions. Many of the concerns that patients and health care staff have around confidentiality breaches both on the telephone and face to face are amenable to careful management. Although rare, identification error or fraud can be a potentially serious problem and further thought needs to be given to the problem of misidentification on the telephone and the use of passwords considered.",
keywords = "access, confidentiality, evaluation, health care quality, physician-patient relations, telephone consulting, same-day appointments, general-practice, primary-care, consultations",
author = "Brian McKinstry and Philip Watson and Hilary Pinnock and David Heaney and Aziz Sheikh",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1093/fampra/cmp032",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "344--350",
journal = "Family Practice",
issn = "0263-2136",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice

T2 - a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff

AU - McKinstry, Brian

AU - Watson, Philip

AU - Pinnock, Hilary

AU - Heaney, David

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Objective. As part of a qualitative investigation into the views of patients, doctors, nurses and administrative staff on the use of telephone consulting in general practice, we set out to explore the impact of the use of this medium on perceptions of confidentiality.Method. We used focus groups of purposively selected patients, clinicians and administrative staff in urban and rural areas.Results. Fifteen focus groups comprising 91 individuals were convened. Participants concerns centred on overheard conversations, the receptionist role in triage, difficulty of maintaining confidentiality in small close-knit communities, errors in identification, third party conversations and answering machines. Telephone consulting, depending on the circumstances, could pose a risk or offer a solution to maintaining confidentiality.Conclusions. Many of the concerns that patients and health care staff have around confidentiality breaches both on the telephone and face to face are amenable to careful management. Although rare, identification error or fraud can be a potentially serious problem and further thought needs to be given to the problem of misidentification on the telephone and the use of passwords considered.

AB - Objective. As part of a qualitative investigation into the views of patients, doctors, nurses and administrative staff on the use of telephone consulting in general practice, we set out to explore the impact of the use of this medium on perceptions of confidentiality.Method. We used focus groups of purposively selected patients, clinicians and administrative staff in urban and rural areas.Results. Fifteen focus groups comprising 91 individuals were convened. Participants concerns centred on overheard conversations, the receptionist role in triage, difficulty of maintaining confidentiality in small close-knit communities, errors in identification, third party conversations and answering machines. Telephone consulting, depending on the circumstances, could pose a risk or offer a solution to maintaining confidentiality.Conclusions. Many of the concerns that patients and health care staff have around confidentiality breaches both on the telephone and face to face are amenable to careful management. Although rare, identification error or fraud can be a potentially serious problem and further thought needs to be given to the problem of misidentification on the telephone and the use of passwords considered.

KW - access

KW - confidentiality

KW - evaluation

KW - health care quality

KW - physician-patient relations

KW - telephone consulting

KW - same-day appointments

KW - general-practice

KW - primary-care

KW - consultations

U2 - 10.1093/fampra/cmp032

DO - 10.1093/fampra/cmp032

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 344

EP - 350

JO - Family Practice

JF - Family Practice

SN - 0263-2136

IS - 5

ER -