Conflicts about water: securitizations in a global context

Stephan Stetter, Eva Herschinger, Thomas Teichler, Mathias Albert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current literature in International Relations and Conflict Studies, water as a source of conflict is either extremely over- or exceedingly underrated. In order to account for the dynamics of water conflicts, it is argued in this article that the study of water conflicts should be linked to comprehensive theories of social conflict and world society. A theoretical framework is developed based on a combination of securitization theory, modern systems theory and sociological neo-institutionalism. The usefulness of this framework is illustrated through two empirical cases of water conflicts, namely Spain and Egypt/Sudan. This study contributes to an understanding of the evolution of water conflicts as a result of securitization practices, the dynamics of these conflicts as complex social systems and as the outcome of local adaptations to and of ‘world cultural’ frames.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-459
Number of pages19
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

water
world society
institutionalism
social conflict
Sudan
system theory
social system
Egypt
international relations
Spain

Cite this

Stetter, S., Herschinger, E., Teichler, T., & Albert, M. (2011). Conflicts about water: securitizations in a global context. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(4), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836711422462

Conflicts about water : securitizations in a global context. / Stetter, Stephan; Herschinger, Eva; Teichler, Thomas; Albert, Mathias .

In: Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 46, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 441-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stetter, S, Herschinger, E, Teichler, T & Albert, M 2011, 'Conflicts about water: securitizations in a global context', Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836711422462
Stetter, Stephan ; Herschinger, Eva ; Teichler, Thomas ; Albert, Mathias . / Conflicts about water : securitizations in a global context. In: Cooperation and Conflict. 2011 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 441-459.
@article{939a3eb3a72c402d85656c3b172e6981,
title = "Conflicts about water: securitizations in a global context",
abstract = "In the current literature in International Relations and Conflict Studies, water as a source of conflict is either extremely over- or exceedingly underrated. In order to account for the dynamics of water conflicts, it is argued in this article that the study of water conflicts should be linked to comprehensive theories of social conflict and world society. A theoretical framework is developed based on a combination of securitization theory, modern systems theory and sociological neo-institutionalism. The usefulness of this framework is illustrated through two empirical cases of water conflicts, namely Spain and Egypt/Sudan. This study contributes to an understanding of the evolution of water conflicts as a result of securitization practices, the dynamics of these conflicts as complex social systems and as the outcome of local adaptations to and of ‘world cultural’ frames.",
author = "Stephan Stetter and Eva Herschinger and Thomas Teichler and Mathias Albert",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0010836711422462",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "441--459",
journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",
issn = "0010-8367",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflicts about water

T2 - securitizations in a global context

AU - Stetter, Stephan

AU - Herschinger, Eva

AU - Teichler, Thomas

AU - Albert, Mathias

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - In the current literature in International Relations and Conflict Studies, water as a source of conflict is either extremely over- or exceedingly underrated. In order to account for the dynamics of water conflicts, it is argued in this article that the study of water conflicts should be linked to comprehensive theories of social conflict and world society. A theoretical framework is developed based on a combination of securitization theory, modern systems theory and sociological neo-institutionalism. The usefulness of this framework is illustrated through two empirical cases of water conflicts, namely Spain and Egypt/Sudan. This study contributes to an understanding of the evolution of water conflicts as a result of securitization practices, the dynamics of these conflicts as complex social systems and as the outcome of local adaptations to and of ‘world cultural’ frames.

AB - In the current literature in International Relations and Conflict Studies, water as a source of conflict is either extremely over- or exceedingly underrated. In order to account for the dynamics of water conflicts, it is argued in this article that the study of water conflicts should be linked to comprehensive theories of social conflict and world society. A theoretical framework is developed based on a combination of securitization theory, modern systems theory and sociological neo-institutionalism. The usefulness of this framework is illustrated through two empirical cases of water conflicts, namely Spain and Egypt/Sudan. This study contributes to an understanding of the evolution of water conflicts as a result of securitization practices, the dynamics of these conflicts as complex social systems and as the outcome of local adaptations to and of ‘world cultural’ frames.

U2 - 10.1177/0010836711422462

DO - 10.1177/0010836711422462

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 441

EP - 459

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

SN - 0010-8367

IS - 4

ER -