Consensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotland

M. Shephard, Paul Alexander Cairney

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The study of administrations and ministers and their relationships with UK Parliaments has tended to focus on the issues of accountability and responsibility, levels of legislative dissent or broad performance indicators supported by anecdotal examples. This paper addresses the lack of systematic analysis of executive/legislative relations in the policy-making process by examining the dominance of different administrations and ministers in the Scottish Parliament. Two questions are addressed. First, is there any variance in the legislative dominance of different administrations in the parliamentary arena? Second, do individual ministers make a difference to the degree of policy dominance? Controlling for both initial authorship and quality of amendments to Executive policy, we analyse the nature and extent of Executive dominance during the legislative process of the First Session of the Scottish Parliament. We find some evidence to suggest that Executive dominance varies both by administration and by individual minister.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)831-855
    Number of pages24
    JournalPublic Administration
    Volume82
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • DEVOLUTION
    • POLITICS

    Cite this

    Consensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotland. / Shephard, M.; Cairney, Paul Alexander.

    In: Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 4, 2004, p. 831-855.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{39387c8c125745469fa60a08e5e9e80b,
    title = "Consensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotland",
    abstract = "The study of administrations and ministers and their relationships with UK Parliaments has tended to focus on the issues of accountability and responsibility, levels of legislative dissent or broad performance indicators supported by anecdotal examples. This paper addresses the lack of systematic analysis of executive/legislative relations in the policy-making process by examining the dominance of different administrations and ministers in the Scottish Parliament. Two questions are addressed. First, is there any variance in the legislative dominance of different administrations in the parliamentary arena? Second, do individual ministers make a difference to the degree of policy dominance? Controlling for both initial authorship and quality of amendments to Executive policy, we analyse the nature and extent of Executive dominance during the legislative process of the First Session of the Scottish Parliament. We find some evidence to suggest that Executive dominance varies both by administration and by individual minister.",
    keywords = "DEVOLUTION, POLITICS",
    author = "M. Shephard and Cairney, {Paul Alexander}",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00421.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "82",
    pages = "831--855",
    journal = "Public Administration",
    issn = "0033-3298",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Consensual or Dominant Relationships with Parliament? A Comparison of Administrations and Ministers in Scotland

    AU - Shephard, M.

    AU - Cairney, Paul Alexander

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - The study of administrations and ministers and their relationships with UK Parliaments has tended to focus on the issues of accountability and responsibility, levels of legislative dissent or broad performance indicators supported by anecdotal examples. This paper addresses the lack of systematic analysis of executive/legislative relations in the policy-making process by examining the dominance of different administrations and ministers in the Scottish Parliament. Two questions are addressed. First, is there any variance in the legislative dominance of different administrations in the parliamentary arena? Second, do individual ministers make a difference to the degree of policy dominance? Controlling for both initial authorship and quality of amendments to Executive policy, we analyse the nature and extent of Executive dominance during the legislative process of the First Session of the Scottish Parliament. We find some evidence to suggest that Executive dominance varies both by administration and by individual minister.

    AB - The study of administrations and ministers and their relationships with UK Parliaments has tended to focus on the issues of accountability and responsibility, levels of legislative dissent or broad performance indicators supported by anecdotal examples. This paper addresses the lack of systematic analysis of executive/legislative relations in the policy-making process by examining the dominance of different administrations and ministers in the Scottish Parliament. Two questions are addressed. First, is there any variance in the legislative dominance of different administrations in the parliamentary arena? Second, do individual ministers make a difference to the degree of policy dominance? Controlling for both initial authorship and quality of amendments to Executive policy, we analyse the nature and extent of Executive dominance during the legislative process of the First Session of the Scottish Parliament. We find some evidence to suggest that Executive dominance varies both by administration and by individual minister.

    KW - DEVOLUTION

    KW - POLITICS

    U2 - 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00421.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00421.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 82

    SP - 831

    EP - 855

    JO - Public Administration

    JF - Public Administration

    SN - 0033-3298

    IS - 4

    ER -